Ad is loading...
CQQQ vs FLHK
CQQQ vs FLHK Comparison
Open Charts CQQQ vs FLHK
Invesco China Technology ETF
Price$41.52
Change-$0.09 (-0.22%)
Volume$186.16K
Net Assets937.65M
Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF
Price$17.53
Change+$0.04 (+0.23%)
Volume$451
Net Assets12.21M
CQQQ vs FLHK Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CQQQ vs. FLHK commentary
Apr 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CQQQ is a StrongBuy and FLHK is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CQQQ has more net assets: 938M vs. FLHK (12.2M). CQQQ has a higher annual dividend yield than FLHK: CQQQ (5.434) vs FLHK (1.140). CQQQ was incepted earlier than FLHK: CQQQ (15 years) vs FLHK (7 years). FLHK (0.09) has a lower expense ratio than CQQQ (0.65). CQQQ has a higher turnover FLHK (6.76) vs FLHK (6.76).
| CQQQ | FLHK | CQQQ / FLHK | |
| Gain YTD | 5.434 | 1.140 | 477% |
| Net Assets | 938M | 12.2M | 7,689% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.09 | 722% |
| Turnover | 43.00 | 6.76 | 636% |
| Yield | 0.25 | 4.29 | 6% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 7 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CQQQ | FLHK | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 74% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 90% | 13 days ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CQQQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CQQQ has been closely correlated with WB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CQQQ jumps, then WB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CQQQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CQQQ | 100% | -0.22% | ||
| WB - CQQQ | 80% Closely correlated | -1.10% | ||
| BILI - CQQQ | 79% Closely correlated | -1.47% | ||
| BIDU - CQQQ | 75% Closely correlated | +1.39% | ||
| GDS - CQQQ | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.35% | ||
| TME - CQQQ | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.45% | ||
More | ||||
FLHK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that FLHK and SN have been poorly correlated (+3% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FLHK and SN's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y