Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CQQQ vs FLHK
CQQQ vs FLHK Comparison
Open Charts CQQQ vs FLHK
Invesco China Technology ETF
Price$42.33
Change-$0.92 (-2.13%)
Volume$142.06K
Net Assets999.77M
Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF
Price$19.95
Change-$0.19 (-0.94%)
Volume$5.65K
Net Assets14M
CQQQ vs FLHK Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CQQQ vs. FLHK commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CQQQ is a Hold and FLHK is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CQQQ has more net assets: 1B vs. FLHK (14M). FLHK has a higher annual dividend yield than CQQQ: FLHK (15.135) vs CQQQ (7.491). CQQQ was incepted earlier than FLHK: CQQQ (16 years) vs FLHK (8 years). FLHK (0.09) has a lower expense ratio than CQQQ (0.65). CQQQ has a higher turnover FLHK (6.76) vs FLHK (6.76).
| CQQQ | FLHK | CQQQ / FLHK | |
| Gain YTD | 7.491 | 15.135 | 49% |
| Net Assets | 1B | 14M | 7,143% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.09 | 722% |
| Turnover | 43.00 | 6.76 | 636% |
| Yield | 0.27 | 4.00 | 7% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 8 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CQQQ | FLHK | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 87% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 73% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 90% | 24 days ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CQQQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CQQQ has been closely correlated with BILI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CQQQ jumps, then BILI could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CQQQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CQQQ | 100% | -2.13% | ||
| BILI - CQQQ | 79% Closely correlated | -3.47% | ||
| WB - CQQQ | 79% Closely correlated | -1.44% | ||
| BIDU - CQQQ | 75% Closely correlated | -2.06% | ||
| GDS - CQQQ | 63% Loosely correlated | -3.89% | ||
| TME - CQQQ | 62% Loosely correlated | -2.13% | ||
More | ||||
FLHK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that FLHK and SN have been poorly correlated (+3% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FLHK and SN's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y