Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CQQQ vs FLHK
CQQQ vs FLHK Comparison
Open Charts CQQQ vs FLHK
Invesco China Technology ETF
Price$43.76
Change-$0.55 (-1.24%)
Volume$1.9K
Net Assets1.1B
Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF
Price$19.17
Change-$0.02 (-0.10%)
Volume$1.27K
Net Assets13.46M
CQQQ vs FLHK Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CQQQ vs. FLHK commentary
Jul 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CQQQ is a Buy and FLHK is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CQQQ has more net assets: 1.11B vs. FLHK (13.5M). FLHK (12.921) and CQQQ (12.519) have matching annual dividend yield . CQQQ was incepted earlier than FLHK: CQQQ (16 years) vs FLHK (8 years). FLHK (0.09) has a lower expense ratio than CQQQ (0.65). FLHK has a higher turnover CQQQ (43.00) vs CQQQ (43.00).
| CQQQ | FLHK | CQQQ / FLHK | |
| Gain YTD | 12.519 | 12.921 | 97% |
| Net Assets | 1.11B | 13.5M | 8,185% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.09 | 722% |
| Turnover | 43.00 | 60.79 | 71% |
| Yield | 0.25 | 4.33 | 6% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 8 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CQQQ | FLHK | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 82% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 81% | 28 days ago 73% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 90% | 22 days ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 7 days ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CQQQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CQQQ has been closely correlated with BILI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CQQQ jumps, then BILI could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CQQQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CQQQ | 100% | +1.89% | ||
| BILI - CQQQ | 79% Closely correlated | +0.40% | ||
| WB - CQQQ | 79% Closely correlated | +1.45% | ||
| BIDU - CQQQ | 75% Closely correlated | +0.55% | ||
| GDS - CQQQ | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.15% | ||
| TME - CQQQ | 62% Loosely correlated | +1.25% | ||
More | ||||
FLHK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that FLHK and SN have been poorly correlated (+3% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FLHK and SN's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y