CRARF
Price
$19.85
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 2 closing price
Capitalization
60.45B
NRDBY
Price
$16.47
Change
+$0.14 (+0.86%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
Capitalization
56.11B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CRARF vs NRDBY

Header iconCRARF vs NRDBY Comparison
Open Charts CRARF vs NRDBYBanner chart's image
Credit Agricole SA
Price$19.85
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$403
Capitalization60.45B
Nordea Bank Abp
Price$16.47
Change+$0.14 (+0.86%)
Volume$287.86K
Capitalization56.11B
CRARF vs NRDBY Comparison Chart in %
CRARF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NRDBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CRARF vs. NRDBY commentary
Oct 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRARF is a Hold and NRDBY is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CRARF: $19.85 vs. NRDBY: $16.47)
Brand notoriety: CRARF and NRDBY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CRARF: 71% vs. NRDBY: 149%
Market capitalization -- CRARF: $60.45B vs. NRDBY: $56.11B
CRARF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $60.45B. NRDBY’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $56.11B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.13B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CRARF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNRDBY’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CRARF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NRDBY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CRARF and NRDBY are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CRARF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NRDBY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CRARF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NRDBY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CRARF is a better buy in the short-term than NRDBY.

Price Growth

CRARF (@Regional Banks) experienced а +4.09% price change this week, while NRDBY (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.38% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.54%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.44% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CRARF($60.5B) has a higher market cap than NRDBY($56.1B). NRDBY has higher P/E ratio than CRARF: NRDBY (10.01) vs CRARF (7.26). NRDBY YTD gains are higher at: 63.059 vs. CRARF (41.887). NRDBY has less debt than CRARF: NRDBY (201B) vs CRARF (313B). CRARF has higher revenues than NRDBY: CRARF (25.8B) vs NRDBY (11.8B).
CRARFNRDBYCRARF / NRDBY
Capitalization60.5B56.1B108%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD41.88763.05966%
P/E Ratio7.2610.0173%
Revenue25.8B11.8B219%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt313B201B156%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CRARF vs NRDBY: Fundamental Ratings
CRARF
NRDBY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
80
Overvalued
84
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
416
SMR RATING
1..100
46
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4743
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4222
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5036

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CRARF's Valuation (80) in the null industry is in the same range as NRDBY (84). This means that CRARF’s stock grew similarly to NRDBY’s over the last 12 months.

NRDBY's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CRARF (41). This means that NRDBY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CRARF’s over the last 12 months.

CRARF's SMR Rating (4) in the null industry is in the same range as NRDBY (6). This means that CRARF’s stock grew similarly to NRDBY’s over the last 12 months.

NRDBY's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as CRARF (47). This means that NRDBY’s stock grew similarly to CRARF’s over the last 12 months.

NRDBY's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the null industry is in the same range as CRARF (42). This means that NRDBY’s stock grew similarly to CRARF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CRARFNRDBY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CRARF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NRDBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BEN23.800.89
+3.88%
Franklin Resources
JZ1.710.04
+2.66%
Jianzhi Education Technology Group Company Limited
INVE3.580.08
+2.29%
Identiv
XOMA39.720.18
+0.46%
XOMA Royalty Corporation
MSGE45.58-1.07
-2.29%
Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp

CRARF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CRARF and BNPQY have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CRARF and BNPQY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CRARF
1D Price
Change %
CRARF100%
N/A
BNPQY - CRARF
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.79%
BNPQF - CRARF
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.89%
MDIBY - CRARF
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.57%
NRDBY - CRARF
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.86%
BAP - CRARF
24%
Poorly correlated
+2.74%
More

NRDBY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NRDBY has been loosely correlated with SWDBY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NRDBY jumps, then SWDBY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NRDBY
1D Price
Change %
NRDBY100%
+0.86%
SWDBY - NRDBY
65%
Loosely correlated
+1.17%
BNPQY - NRDBY
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.79%
DNBBY - NRDBY
53%
Loosely correlated
+1.01%
ISNPY - NRDBY
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.38%
TFC - NRDBY
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.35%
More