Ad is loading...
CRAZX vs HSAFX
CRAZX vs HSAFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CRAZX vs. HSAFX commentary
Apr 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRAZX is a Hold and HSAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CRAZX has more cash in the bank: 2.35B vs. HSAFX (28.5M). CRAZX pays higher dividends than HSAFX: CRAZX (2.50) vs HSAFX (2.12). CRAZX was incepted earlier than HSAFX: CRAZX (13 years) vs HSAFX (6 years). HSAFX (2.18) is less costly to investors than CRAZX (0.81). CRAZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 190.00 vs. HSAFX (129.00). HSAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CRAZX: HSAFX (1000) vs CRAZX (2000). CRAZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.07 vs. HSAFX (6.57). CRAZX return over 5 years is better than : 9.17 vs. HSAFX (2.04).
| CRAZX | HSAFX | CRAZX / HSAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 1.29 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 2.18 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.210 | 5.450 | 4% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.35B | 28.5M | 8,256% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.50 | 2.12 | 118% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.07 | 6.57 | 123% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.96 | -6.18 | -129% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.17 | 2.04 | 448% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.64 | N/A | - |