Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CRAZX vs HSAFX
CRAZX vs HSAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CRAZX vs. HSAFX commentary
Nov 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRAZX is a Hold and HSAFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CRAZX has more cash in the bank: 2.47B vs. HSAFX (27.4M). CRAZX (2.21) and HSAFX (2.13) have matching dividends . CRAZX was incepted earlier than HSAFX: CRAZX (13 years) vs HSAFX (6 years). HSAFX (2.18) is less costly to investors than CRAZX (0.81). HSAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 468.00 vs. CRAZX (186.00). HSAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CRAZX: HSAFX (1000) vs CRAZX (2000). CRAZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.96 vs. HSAFX (6.46). CRAZX return over 5 years is better than : 8.80 vs. HSAFX (-3.86).
| CRAZX | HSAFX | CRAZX / HSAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 1.29 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 2.18 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.221 | 6.774 | 195% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.47B | 27.4M | 9,026% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.21 | 2.13 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.96 | 6.46 | 170% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.75 | -7.39 | -403% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.80 | -3.86 | -228% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.28 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement