Ad is loading...
CRAZX vs LCRIX
CRAZX vs LCRIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CRAZX vs. LCRIX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRAZX is a Hold and LCRIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CRAZX has more cash in the bank: 2.39B vs. LCRIX (506M). CRAZX pays higher dividends than LCRIX: CRAZX (2.50) vs LCRIX (1.66). CRAZX was incepted earlier than LCRIX: CRAZX (13 years) vs LCRIX (19 years). LCRIX (1.34) is less costly to investors than CRAZX (0.81). CRAZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 190.00 vs. LCRIX (68.00). CRAZX has a lower initial minimum investment than LCRIX: CRAZX (2000) vs LCRIX (100000). CRAZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.38 vs. LCRIX (-3.79). LCRIX return over 5 years is better than : 31.86 vs. CRAZX (12.41).
| CRAZX | LCRIX | CRAZX / LCRIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 1.34 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 1.34 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.364 | -0.546 | -250% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 100000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.39B | 506M | 472% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.50 | 1.66 | 151% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.38 | -3.79 | -168% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.50 | -0.66 | -986% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.41 | 31.86 | 39% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.19 | 22.60 | 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...