CRBBF
Price
$8.48
Change
-$0.03 (-0.35%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
267.9M
DGEAF
Price
$30.10
Change
+$0.10 (+0.33%)
Updated
Jan 30 closing price
Capitalization
98.12B
Ad is loading...

CRBBF vs DGEAF

Header iconCRBBF vs DGEAF Comparison
Open Charts CRBBF vs DGEAFBanner chart's image
Corby Spirit and Wine
Price$8.48
Change-$0.03 (-0.35%)
Volume$800
Capitalization267.9M
Diageo
Price$30.10
Change+$0.10 (+0.33%)
Volume$2.03K
Capitalization98.12B
CRBBF vs DGEAF Comparison Chart
Loading...
DGEAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CRBBF vs. DGEAF commentary
Feb 01, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRBBF is a Hold and DGEAF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 01, 2025
Stock price -- (CRBBF: $8.48 vs. DGEAF: $30.10)
Brand notoriety: CRBBF and DGEAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Beverages: Alcoholic industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CRBBF: 210% vs. DGEAF: 45%
Market capitalization -- CRBBF: $267.9M vs. DGEAF: $98.12B
CRBBF [@Beverages: Alcoholic] is valued at $267.9M. DGEAF’s [@Beverages: Alcoholic] market capitalization is $98.12B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Beverages: Alcoholic] industry ranges from $19.33T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Beverages: Alcoholic] industry is $21.08B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CRBBF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileDGEAF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CRBBF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • DGEAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CRBBF and DGEAF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DGEAF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • DGEAF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.

Price Growth

CRBBF (@Beverages: Alcoholic) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while DGEAF (@Beverages: Alcoholic) price change was +2.28% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Alcoholic industry was +0.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.52%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Beverages: Alcoholic (+0.49% weekly)

The alcoholic beverage market includes beer, wine, and spirits. From $230 billion in 2015, the industry has grown to around $250 billion by 2019. In recent years, alcoholic beverage makers have been looking to expand distribution and purchase channels, such as through online stores (e.g. e-commerce platform Drizly) and convenience stores. Anheuser-Busch In Bev and Diageo are major global alcoholic beverage companies, while U.S.-owned companies include Constellation Brands and Brown-Forman Corp. among several others.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DGEAF($98.1B) has a higher market cap than CRBBF($268M). DGEAF has higher P/E ratio than CRBBF: DGEAF (21.32) vs CRBBF (17.17). CRBBF YTD gains are higher at: -0.353 vs. DGEAF (-5.979). DGEAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.27B vs. CRBBF (46.1M). DGEAF has more cash in the bank: 3.16B vs. CRBBF (38M). CRBBF has less debt than DGEAF: CRBBF (131M) vs DGEAF (17.6B). DGEAF has higher revenues than CRBBF: DGEAF (16.9B) vs CRBBF (191M).
CRBBFDGEAFCRBBF / DGEAF
Capitalization268M98.1B0%
EBITDA46.1M6.27B1%
Gain YTD-0.353-5.9796%
P/E Ratio17.1721.3281%
Revenue191M16.9B1%
Total Cash38M3.16B1%
Total Debt131M17.6B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CRBBF vs DGEAF: Fundamental Ratings
CRBBF
DGEAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3310
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
4
Undervalued
28
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
5899
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7260
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8168
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
55n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CRBBF's Valuation (4) in the null industry is in the same range as DGEAF (28). This means that CRBBF’s stock grew similarly to DGEAF’s over the last 12 months.

CRBBF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as DGEAF (100). This means that CRBBF’s stock grew similarly to DGEAF’s over the last 12 months.

CRBBF's SMR Rating (58) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DGEAF (99). This means that CRBBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than DGEAF’s over the last 12 months.

DGEAF's Price Growth Rating (60) in the null industry is in the same range as CRBBF (72). This means that DGEAF’s stock grew similarly to CRBBF’s over the last 12 months.

DGEAF's P/E Growth Rating (68) in the null industry is in the same range as CRBBF (81). This means that DGEAF’s stock grew similarly to CRBBF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CRBBFDGEAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
21%
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
28%
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
DGEAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IESC226.9411.41
+5.29%
IES Holdings
AMRC22.500.48
+2.18%
Ameresco
VICI29.840.20
+0.67%
VICI Properties
DUOT5.88-0.02
-0.34%
Duos Technologies Group
SGHT2.97-0.08
-2.62%
Sight Sciences

CRBBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CRBBF and CWGL have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CRBBF and CWGL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CRBBF
1D Price
Change %
CRBBF100%
N/A
CWGL - CRBBF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.66%
DGEAF - CRBBF
10%
Poorly correlated
+0.33%
CRHKY - CRBBF
8%
Poorly correlated
+1.13%
CBYDF - CRBBF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CABGY - CRBBF
1%
Poorly correlated
+2.38%
More

DGEAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DGEAF has been loosely correlated with PRNDY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DGEAF jumps, then PRNDY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DGEAF
1D Price
Change %
DGEAF100%
+0.33%
PRNDY - DGEAF
39%
Loosely correlated
+1.19%
DEO - DGEAF
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.72%
REMYY - DGEAF
31%
Poorly correlated
+1.93%
TSRYY - DGEAF
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.91%
DVCMY - DGEAF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.52%
More