CRCUF
Price
$0.34
Change
+$0.01 (+3.03%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
24.78M
HVGDF
Price
$0.07
Change
+$0.01 (+16.67%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
574.57K
Interact to see
Advertisement

CRCUF vs HVGDF

Header iconCRCUF vs HVGDF Comparison
Open Charts CRCUF vs HVGDFBanner chart's image
CANAGOLD RES
Price$0.34
Change+$0.01 (+3.03%)
Volume$79K
Capitalization24.78M
Harvest Gold
Price$0.07
Change+$0.01 (+16.67%)
Volume$3K
Capitalization574.57K
CRCUF vs HVGDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CRCUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HVGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CRCUF vs. HVGDF commentary
Jul 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRCUF is a Buy and HVGDF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 29, 2025
Stock price -- (CRCUF: $0.32 vs. HVGDF: $0.06)
Brand notoriety: CRCUF and HVGDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CRCUF: 212% vs. HVGDF: 27%
Market capitalization -- CRCUF: $24.78M vs. HVGDF: $574.57K
CRCUF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $24.78M. HVGDF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $574.57K. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CRCUF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHVGDF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CRCUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HVGDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, HVGDF is a better buy in the long-term than CRCUF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CRCUF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HVGDF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CRCUF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HVGDF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HVGDF is a better buy in the short-term than CRCUF.

Price Growth

CRCUF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +11.82% price change this week, while HVGDF (@Precious Metals) price change was +20.20% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +1.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.10%, and the average quarterly price growth was +52.99%.

Reported Earning Dates

CRCUF is expected to report earnings on May 15, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+1.41% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CRCUF($24.8M) has a higher market cap than HVGDF($575K). HVGDF YTD gains are higher at: 200.500 vs. CRCUF (78.695). HVGDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -322.51K vs. CRCUF (-1.73M). CRCUF has more cash in the bank: 3.19M vs. HVGDF (449K). CRCUF (0) and HVGDF (0) have equivalent revenues.
CRCUFHVGDFCRCUF / HVGDF
Capitalization24.8M575K4,313%
EBITDA-1.73M-322.51K536%
Gain YTD78.695200.50039%
P/E RatioN/A12.69-
Revenue00-
Total Cash3.19M449K710%
Total Debt245KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CRCUF vs HVGDF: Fundamental Ratings
CRCUF
HVGDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
81
Overvalued
54
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9093
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3734
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
97100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a95

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HVGDF's Valuation (54) in the null industry is in the same range as CRCUF (81). This means that HVGDF’s stock grew similarly to CRCUF’s over the last 12 months.

HVGDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CRCUF (100). This means that HVGDF’s stock grew similarly to CRCUF’s over the last 12 months.

CRCUF's SMR Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as HVGDF (93). This means that CRCUF’s stock grew similarly to HVGDF’s over the last 12 months.

HVGDF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as CRCUF (37). This means that HVGDF’s stock grew similarly to CRCUF’s over the last 12 months.

CRCUF's P/E Growth Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as HVGDF (100). This means that CRCUF’s stock grew similarly to HVGDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CRCUFHVGDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CRCUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HVGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LZ9.230.15
+1.65%
LegalZoom.com
EDU47.310.63
+1.35%
New Oriental Education and Technology Group
MHH8.03-0.05
-0.62%
Mastech Digital
NNOX5.14-0.06
-1.15%
NANO-X IMAGING Ltd
PCSA0.23-0.01
-4.65%
Processa Pharmaceuticals

CRCUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CRCUF and HVGDF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CRCUF and HVGDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CRCUF
1D Price
Change %
CRCUF100%
-7.32%
HVGDF - CRCUF
29%
Poorly correlated
-18.78%
GSRCF - CRCUF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HL - CRCUF
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.61%
TORXF - CRCUF
21%
Poorly correlated
-3.88%
SMAGF - CRCUF
20%
Poorly correlated
-8.18%
More

HVGDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HVGDF has been loosely correlated with SDRC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HVGDF jumps, then SDRC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HVGDF
1D Price
Change %
HVGDF100%
-18.78%
SDRC - HVGDF
36%
Loosely correlated
-3.02%
CRCUF - HVGDF
29%
Poorly correlated
-7.32%
PDIV - HVGDF
24%
Poorly correlated
+50.55%
MEXGF - HVGDF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HGMCF - HVGDF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More