CRCUF
Price
$0.31
Change
-$0.02 (-6.06%)
Updated
Aug 6 closing price
Capitalization
24.78M
OMMSF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 6 closing price
Capitalization
8.52M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CRCUF vs OMMSF

Header iconCRCUF vs OMMSF Comparison
Open Charts CRCUF vs OMMSFBanner chart's image
CANAGOLD RES
Price$0.31
Change-$0.02 (-6.06%)
Volume$6K
Capitalization24.78M
Omineca Mining & Metals
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$10.5K
Capitalization8.52M
CRCUF vs OMMSF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CRCUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OMMSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CRCUF vs. OMMSF commentary
Aug 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRCUF is a Hold and OMMSF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 08, 2025
Stock price -- (CRCUF: $0.31 vs. OMMSF: $0.04)
Brand notoriety: CRCUF and OMMSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CRCUF: 32% vs. OMMSF: 24%
Market capitalization -- CRCUF: $24.78M vs. OMMSF: $8.52M
CRCUF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $24.78M. OMMSF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $8.52M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CRCUF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileOMMSF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CRCUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • OMMSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, OMMSF is a better buy in the long-term than CRCUF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CRCUF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OMMSF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CRCUF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • OMMSF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CRCUF is a better buy in the short-term than OMMSF.

Price Growth

CRCUF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -3.42% price change this week, while OMMSF (@Precious Metals) price change was -11.87% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +4.46%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +46.54%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+4.46% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CRCUF($24.8M) has a higher market cap than OMMSF($8.52M). CRCUF YTD gains are higher at: 76.937 vs. OMMSF (-31.071). OMMSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -983.34K vs. CRCUF (-1.73M). CRCUF (0) and OMMSF (0) have equivalent revenues.
CRCUFOMMSFCRCUF / OMMSF
Capitalization24.8M8.52M291%
EBITDA-1.73M-983.34K176%
Gain YTD76.937-31.071-248%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash3.19MN/A-
Total Debt245KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CRCUF vs OMMSF: Fundamental Ratings
CRCUF
OMMSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2489
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
81
Overvalued
39
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9297
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3846
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
97100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OMMSF's Valuation (39) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CRCUF (81). This means that OMMSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CRCUF’s over the last 12 months.

OMMSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CRCUF (100). This means that OMMSF’s stock grew similarly to CRCUF’s over the last 12 months.

CRCUF's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as OMMSF (97). This means that CRCUF’s stock grew similarly to OMMSF’s over the last 12 months.

CRCUF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as OMMSF (46). This means that CRCUF’s stock grew similarly to OMMSF’s over the last 12 months.

CRCUF's P/E Growth Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as OMMSF (100). This means that CRCUF’s stock grew similarly to OMMSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CRCUFOMMSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CRCUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OMMSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SHOP154.9027.90
+21.97%
Shopify Inc
TLSA2.330.04
+1.75%
Tiziana Life Sciences Ltd
JRSH3.300.02
+0.61%
Jerash Holdings (US)
ECVT8.39-0.08
-0.94%
Ecovyst
FRPT63.69-3.73
-5.53%
Freshpet

CRCUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CRCUF and HVGDF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CRCUF and HVGDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CRCUF
1D Price
Change %
CRCUF100%
-6.28%
HVGDF - CRCUF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GSRCF - CRCUF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HL - CRCUF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.49%
TORXF - CRCUF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.04%
SMAGF - CRCUF
20%
Poorly correlated
+5.77%
More

OMMSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that OMMSF and BBBXF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OMMSF and BBBXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OMMSF
1D Price
Change %
OMMSF100%
-5.16%
BBBXF - OMMSF
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.60%
RVLGF - OMMSF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.15%
CRCUF - OMMSF
21%
Poorly correlated
-6.28%
FFOXF - OMMSF
20%
Poorly correlated
-3.50%
PGLDF - OMMSF
20%
Poorly correlated
+2.07%
More