CRECF
Price
$0.31
Change
-$0.01 (-3.12%)
Updated
Apr 23 closing price
Capitalization
287.52M
PLL
Price
$8.47
Change
-$0.44 (-4.94%)
Updated
Apr 25 closing price
Capitalization
256.53M
5 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CRECF vs PLL

Header iconCRECF vs PLL Comparison
Open Charts CRECF vs PLLBanner chart's image
Critical Elements Lithium
Price$0.31
Change-$0.01 (-3.12%)
Volume$4.66K
Capitalization287.52M
Piedmont Lithium
Price$8.47
Change-$0.44 (-4.94%)
Volume$352.7K
Capitalization256.53M
CRECF vs PLL Comparison Chart
Loading...
PLL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CRECF vs. PLL commentary
Apr 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRECF is a Hold and PLL is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 27, 2025
Stock price -- (CRECF: $0.31 vs. PLL: $8.91)
Brand notoriety: CRECF and PLL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CRECF: 25% vs. PLL: 1%
Market capitalization -- CRECF: $287.52M vs. PLL: $256.53M
CRECF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $287.52M. PLL’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $256.53M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.15B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CRECF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePLL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CRECF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PLL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CRECF and PLL are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PLL’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • PLL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

CRECF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +1.02% price change this week, while PLL (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +35.62% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +1.82%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.85%.

Reported Earning Dates

PLL is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+1.82% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CRECF($288M) has a higher market cap than PLL($257M). CRECF YTD gains are higher at: 15.442 vs. PLL (1.945). CRECF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -5.64M vs. PLL (-18.36M). PLL has more cash in the bank: 72.2M vs. CRECF (34.7M). CRECF has less debt than PLL: CRECF (248K) vs PLL (1.57M). PLL has higher revenues than CRECF: PLL (39.8M) vs CRECF (0).
CRECFPLLCRECF / PLL
Capitalization288M257M112%
EBITDA-5.64M-18.36M31%
Gain YTD15.4421.945794%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue039.8M-
Total Cash34.7M72.2M48%
Total Debt248K1.57M16%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CRECF vs PLL: Fundamental Ratings
CRECF
PLL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5039
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
99
Overvalued
31
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8992
SMR RATING
1..100
8692
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6251
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
50100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PLL's Valuation (31) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is significantly better than the same rating for CRECF (99) in the null industry. This means that PLL’s stock grew significantly faster than CRECF’s over the last 12 months.

CRECF's Profit vs Risk Rating (89) in the null industry is in the same range as PLL (92) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry. This means that CRECF’s stock grew similarly to PLL’s over the last 12 months.

CRECF's SMR Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as PLL (92) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry. This means that CRECF’s stock grew similarly to PLL’s over the last 12 months.

PLL's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is in the same range as CRECF (62) in the null industry. This means that PLL’s stock grew similarly to CRECF’s over the last 12 months.

CRECF's P/E Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PLL (100) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry. This means that CRECF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PLL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PLL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
PLL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ATHYX26.440.24
+0.92%
American Century Heritage Y
FADCX25.320.18
+0.72%
Fidelity Advisor Diversified Intl C
ALSMX13.230.04
+0.30%
Archer Multi Cap
GTCEX25.300.01
+0.04%
Glenmede Strategic Equity
FSRTX8.45N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Ret M

CRECF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CRECF and HBM have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CRECF and HBM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CRECF
1D Price
Change %
CRECF100%
N/A
HBM - CRECF
31%
Poorly correlated
-1.46%
NGLOY - CRECF
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.07%
IE - CRECF
27%
Poorly correlated
-2.82%
ERO - CRECF
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.32%
PLL - CRECF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

PLL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PLL has been loosely correlated with LAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PLL jumps, then LAC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PLL
1D Price
Change %
PLL100%
N/A
LAC - PLL
58%
Loosely correlated
-2.03%
LAR - PLL
57%
Loosely correlated
-0.93%
SGML - PLL
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.24%
FSUGY - PLL
48%
Loosely correlated
N/A
GLNCY - PLL
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.14%
More