CRESY vs FIP
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRESY is a StrongBuy and FIP is a Hold.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CRESY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FIP’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CRESY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- FIP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
| CRESY | FIP | CRESY / FIP | |
| Capitalization | 638M | 652M | 98% |
| EBITDA | 195B | 23.3M | 836,910% |
| Gain YTD | -13.381 | -35.415 | 38% |
| P/E Ratio | 8.97 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 185B | 320M | 57,813% |
| Total Cash | 223B | 29.4M | 758,503% |
| Total Debt | 812B | 1.41B | 57,548% |
CRESY | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 70 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 9 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 19 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 26 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 49 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 3 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| CRESY | FIP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 67% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 76% | 9 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 86% |
CRESY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRESY has been loosely correlated with IRS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CRESY jumps, then IRS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CRESY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRESY | 100% | +1.11% | ||
| IRS - CRESY | 53% Loosely correlated | +2.36% | ||
| IEP - CRESY | 26% Poorly correlated | +2.28% | ||
| HON - CRESY | 23% Poorly correlated | -0.03% | ||
| FIP - CRESY | 23% Poorly correlated | +2.42% | ||
| IIIN - CRESY | 22% Poorly correlated | +2.10% | ||
More | ||||
FIP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FIP has been loosely correlated with MLI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FIP jumps, then MLI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FIP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FIP | 100% | +2.42% | ||
| MLI - FIP | 37% Loosely correlated | +1.42% | ||
| TRC - FIP | 36% Loosely correlated | -0.46% | ||
| IIIN - FIP | 34% Loosely correlated | +2.10% | ||
| CODI - FIP | 34% Loosely correlated | -62.03% | ||
| NWPX - FIP | 33% Poorly correlated | +3.57% | ||
More | ||||