Advertisement
CRESY vs IEP
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRESY is a Hold and IEP is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CRESY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileIEP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CRESY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- IEP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CRESY’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IEP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CRESY’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- IEP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CRESY (@Industrial Conglomerates) experienced а -8.26% price change this week, while IEP (@Oil Refining/Marketing) price change was -1.49% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Conglomerates industry was +0.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.69%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.63%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil Refining/Marketing industry was -6.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.04%.
Reported Earning Dates
IEP is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Industrial Conglomerates (+0.26% weekly)Industrial Conglomerates specialize in numerous types of products, most of which comprise industrial goods, while some also go towards meeting household needs. Honeywell (makes engineering services and aerospace systems), United Technologies Corporation(manufactures aircraft engines, aerospace systems, HVAC, elevators and escalators, fire and security, building systems, and industrial products, among others), 3M (over 60,000 products under several world-renowned brands, including adhesives, abrasives, laminates, passive fire protection, personal protective equipment, window films, paint protection films, dental and orthodontic products, electrical & electronic connecting and insulating materials, medical products, car-care products, electronic circuits, healthcare software and optical films).
@Oil Refining/Marketing (-6.63% weekly)The Oil Refining/Marketing segment includes companies that refine crude oil into a number of petroleum products, including gasoline, jet fuel and diesel, and then sell the usable products to the end users. These companies are involved in what’s called downstream operations in the oil business. They also engage in the marketing and distribution of crude oil and natural gas products. In other words, the downstream oil and gas business is focused on post-production processes of crude oil and natural gas. When oil prices slump, downstream businesses are hurt less or in some cases even benefit, since their purchase cost of crude oil goes down. Some of the biggest U.S. oil refining/marketing companies include Phillips 66, Marathon Petroleum Corporation and Valero Energy Corp.
| CRESY | IEP | CRESY / IEP | |
| Capitalization | 882M | 4.9B | 18% |
| EBITDA | 623B | 804M | 77,488% |
| Gain YTD | -7.680 | 9.591 | -80% |
| P/E Ratio | 5.79 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 1.04T | 9.6B | 10,847% |
| Total Cash | 657B | 2.94B | 22,370% |
| Total Debt | 1.94T | 6.39B | 30,413% |
CRESY | IEP | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 40 | 89 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 2 Undervalued | 12 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 35 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 35 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | 54 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 96 | 57 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 34 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CRESY's Valuation (2) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as IEP (12) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means that CRESY’s stock grew similarly to IEP’s over the last 12 months.
CRESY's Profit vs Risk Rating (35) in the Real Estate Development industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IEP (100) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means that CRESY’s stock grew somewhat faster than IEP’s over the last 12 months.
CRESY's SMR Rating (35) in the Real Estate Development industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IEP (97) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means that CRESY’s stock grew somewhat faster than IEP’s over the last 12 months.
CRESY's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as IEP (54) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means that CRESY’s stock grew similarly to IEP’s over the last 12 months.
IEP's P/E Growth Rating (57) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CRESY (96) in the Real Estate Development industry. This means that IEP’s stock grew somewhat faster than CRESY’s over the last 12 months.
| CRESY | IEP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 56% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 46% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 53% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 51% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 83% | 20 days ago 50% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% | 4 days ago 54% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 51% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 45% |
Advertisement
CRESY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRESY has been closely correlated with PAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CRESY jumps, then PAM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CRESY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRESY | 100% | -0.34% | ||
| PAM - CRESY | 76% Closely correlated | +0.67% | ||
| IRS - CRESY | 53% Loosely correlated | +1.16% | ||
| IEP - CRESY | 26% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| IIIN - CRESY | 22% Poorly correlated | +1.54% | ||
| BBUC - CRESY | 22% Poorly correlated | +3.70% | ||
More | ||||
IEP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IEP has been loosely correlated with CODI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IEP jumps, then CODI could also see price increases.