CRESY
Price
$12.89
Change
+$0.33 (+2.63%)
Updated
Feb 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
637.67M
2 days until earnings call
SPLP
Price
$40.53
Change
-$1.96 (-4.61%)
Updated
Feb 4 closing price
Capitalization
774.85M
Ad is loading...

CRESY vs SPLP

Header iconCRESY vs SPLP Comparison
Open Charts CRESY vs SPLPBanner chart's image
Cresud S.A.C.I.F. y A
Price$12.89
Change+$0.33 (+2.63%)
Volume$1.95K
Capitalization637.67M
Steel Partners Holdings
Price$40.53
Change-$1.96 (-4.61%)
Volume$2.01K
Capitalization774.85M
CRESY vs SPLP Comparison Chart
Loading...
CRESY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SPLP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CRESY vs. SPLP commentary
Feb 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRESY is a StrongBuy and SPLP is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 05, 2025

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CRESY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SPLP’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CRESY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • SPLP’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CRESY is a better buy in the short-term than SPLP.
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SPLP($775M) has a higher market cap than CRESY($638M). CRESY has higher P/E ratio than SPLP: CRESY (8.97) vs SPLP (5.91). CRESY YTD gains are higher at: 2.296 vs. SPLP (-4.770). CRESY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 195B vs. SPLP (317M). CRESY has more cash in the bank: 223B vs. SPLP (578M). SPLP has less debt than CRESY: SPLP (268M) vs CRESY (812B). CRESY has higher revenues than SPLP: CRESY (185B) vs SPLP (1.91B).
CRESYSPLPCRESY / SPLP
Capitalization638M775M82%
EBITDA195B317M61,514%
Gain YTD2.296-4.770-48%
P/E Ratio8.975.91152%
Revenue185B1.91B9,711%
Total Cash223B578M38,581%
Total Debt812B268M302,985%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CRESY vs SPLP: Fundamental Ratings
CRESY
SPLP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
694
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
10
Undervalued
54
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1311
SMR RATING
1..100
9240
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3847
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
378
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CRESY's Valuation (10) in the Real Estate Development industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SPLP (54) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means that CRESY’s stock grew somewhat faster than SPLP’s over the last 12 months.

SPLP's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as CRESY (13) in the Real Estate Development industry. This means that SPLP’s stock grew similarly to CRESY’s over the last 12 months.

SPLP's SMR Rating (40) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CRESY (92) in the Real Estate Development industry. This means that SPLP’s stock grew somewhat faster than CRESY’s over the last 12 months.

CRESY's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as SPLP (47) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means that CRESY’s stock grew similarly to SPLP’s over the last 12 months.

CRESY's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Real Estate Development industry is significantly better than the same rating for SPLP (78) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means that CRESY’s stock grew significantly faster than SPLP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CRESYSPLP
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 29 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bearish Trend 29 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 29 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 29 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 29 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
84%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CRESY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SPLP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FDSVX62.57N/A
N/A
Fidelity Growth Discovery
LMGYX33.37N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Growth Opportunities I
LMOFX40.75N/A
N/A
Patient Opportunity FI
RYUTX51.56N/A
N/A
Rydex Utilities A
LMCLX8.89N/A
N/A
Miller Income I

CRESY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRESY has been loosely correlated with IRS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CRESY jumps, then IRS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CRESY
1D Price
Change %
CRESY100%
+2.87%
IRS - CRESY
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.28%
IEP - CRESY
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.32%
HON - CRESY
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.51%
FIP - CRESY
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.78%
IIIN - CRESY
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.46%
More

SPLP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SPLP and RCMT have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SPLP and RCMT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SPLP
1D Price
Change %
SPLP100%
-4.61%
RCMT - SPLP
9%
Poorly correlated
+2.68%
CRESY - SPLP
5%
Poorly correlated
+2.87%
RYI - SPLP
4%
Poorly correlated
+3.89%
HON - SPLP
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.51%
VMI - SPLP
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.53%
More