CRESY vs TUSK
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRESY is a Buy and TUSK is a Hold.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CRESY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TUSK’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CRESY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- TUSK’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
| CRESY | TUSK | CRESY / TUSK | |
| Capitalization | 638M | 177M | 360% |
| EBITDA | 195B | 67M | 291,045% |
| Gain YTD | -24.941 | -33.333 | 75% |
| P/E Ratio | 8.97 | 23.38 | 38% |
| Revenue | 185B | 309M | 59,871% |
| Total Cash | 223B | 16.6M | 1,343,373% |
| Total Debt | 812B | 63.3M | 1,282,780% |
CRESY | TUSK | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 74 | 19 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 9 Undervalued | 66 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 21 | 77 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 33 | 95 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 56 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 3 | 3 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CRESY's Valuation (9) in the Real Estate Development industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TUSK (66) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that CRESY’s stock grew somewhat faster than TUSK’s over the last 12 months.
CRESY's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the Real Estate Development industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TUSK (77) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that CRESY’s stock grew somewhat faster than TUSK’s over the last 12 months.
CRESY's SMR Rating (33) in the Real Estate Development industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TUSK (95) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that CRESY’s stock grew somewhat faster than TUSK’s over the last 12 months.
CRESY's Price Growth Rating (56) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as TUSK (61) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that CRESY’s stock grew similarly to TUSK’s over the last 12 months.
CRESY's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as TUSK (3) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that CRESY’s stock grew similarly to TUSK’s over the last 12 months.
| CRESY | TUSK | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 10 days ago 87% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 79% |
CRESY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRESY has been loosely correlated with IRS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CRESY jumps, then IRS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CRESY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRESY | 100% | -5.29% | ||
| IRS - CRESY | 53% Loosely correlated | -2.21% | ||
| IEP - CRESY | 26% Poorly correlated | -1.08% | ||
| HON - CRESY | 23% Poorly correlated | -2.45% | ||
| FIP - CRESY | 23% Poorly correlated | -8.94% | ||
| IIIN - CRESY | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.46% | ||
More | ||||