It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CREV’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileINVZ’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CREV’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while INVZ’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
CREV (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а -23.33% price change this week, while INVZ (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was -24.17% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was -2.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +33.94%.
CREV is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2025.
INVZ is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2025.
OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.
CREV | INVZ | CREV / INVZ | |
Capitalization | 30.8M | 244M | 13% |
EBITDA | N/A | -123.41M | - |
Gain YTD | -87.018 | -80.751 | 108% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
Revenue | N/A | 20.9M | - |
Total Cash | N/A | 145M | - |
Total Debt | N/A | 32.5M | - |
CREV | INVZ | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago86% | 4 days ago89% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago85% | 4 days ago73% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago90% | 6 days ago77% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago80% | 7 days ago84% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago90% | 4 days ago85% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago90% | 4 days ago84% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago77% | 12 days ago74% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago90% | 4 days ago90% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago90% | 4 days ago80% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago90% | 4 days ago87% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
PRNCX | 9.92 | -0.02 | -0.20% |
T. Rowe Price Intl Disciplined Eq Adv | |||
IPAYX | 11.15 | -0.03 | -0.27% |
Integrity Dividend Summit I | |||
VFMFX | 44.02 | -0.31 | -0.70% |
Vanguard US Multifactor Admiral™ | |||
NMFAX | 15.19 | -0.20 | -1.30% |
Nationwide BNY Mellon Dyn US Core A | |||
HGOFX | 64.07 | -1.51 | -2.30% |
Hartford Growth Opportunities F |
A.I.dvisor tells us that CREV and HSAI have been poorly correlated (+19% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CREV and HSAI's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CREV | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CREV | 100% | -8.27% | ||
HSAI - CREV | 19% Poorly correlated | -3.09% | ||
PHIN - CREV | 10% Poorly correlated | +0.52% | ||
GTX - CREV | 7% Poorly correlated | +0.64% | ||
HLLY - CREV | 7% Poorly correlated | +2.22% | ||
INVZ - CREV | 7% Poorly correlated | -2.60% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, INVZ has been loosely correlated with AEVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if INVZ jumps, then AEVA could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To INVZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
INVZ | 100% | -2.60% | ||
AEVA - INVZ | 53% Loosely correlated | -1.06% | ||
LAZR - INVZ | 42% Loosely correlated | -4.85% | ||
LIDR - INVZ | 38% Loosely correlated | -6.54% | ||
AXL - INVZ | 37% Loosely correlated | +0.48% | ||
DORM - INVZ | 36% Loosely correlated | -0.90% | ||
More |