CREX
Price
$2.40
Change
-$0.11 (-4.38%)
Updated
Aug 29, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
26.4M
FALC
Price
$1.81
Change
-$0.03 (-1.63%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
12.86M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CREX vs FALC

Header iconCREX vs FALC Comparison
Open Charts CREX vs FALCBanner chart's image
Creative Realities
Price$2.40
Change-$0.11 (-4.38%)
Volume$1.51K
Capitalization26.4M
FalconStor Software
Price$1.81
Change-$0.03 (-1.63%)
Volume$165
Capitalization12.86M
CREX vs FALC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CREX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FALC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CREX vs. FALC commentary
Aug 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CREX is a Hold and FALC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 30, 2025
Stock price -- (CREX: $2.51 vs. FALC: $1.81)
Brand notoriety: CREX and FALC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CREX: 65% vs. FALC: 11%
Market capitalization -- CREX: $26.4M vs. FALC: $12.93M
CREX [@Packaged Software] is valued at $26.4M. FALC’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $12.93M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $320.41B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $9.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CREX’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFALC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CREX’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FALC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CREX is a better buy in the long-term than FALC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CREX’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FALC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CREX’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FALC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CREX is a better buy in the short-term than FALC.

Price Growth

CREX (@Packaged Software) experienced а +5.91% price change this week, while FALC (@Packaged Software) price change was -7.18% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -0.45%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.65%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-0.45% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CREX($26.4M) has a higher market cap than FALC($12.9M). CREX YTD gains are higher at: 2.449 vs. FALC (-9.500). CREX has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.06M vs. FALC (1.84M). FALC has more cash in the bank: 2.86M vs. CREX (569K). FALC has less debt than CREX: FALC (2.33M) vs CREX (22M). CREX has higher revenues than FALC: CREX (48.2M) vs FALC (11.2M).
CREXFALCCREX / FALC
Capitalization26.4M12.9M205%
EBITDA5.06M1.84M275%
Gain YTD2.449-9.500-26%
P/E Ratio12.53N/A-
Revenue48.2M11.2M430%
Total Cash569K2.86M20%
Total Debt22M2.33M946%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CREX vs FALC: Fundamental Ratings
CREX
FALC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
985
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
49
Fair valued
74
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6445
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CREX's Valuation (49) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as FALC (74) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that CREX’s stock grew similarly to FALC’s over the last 12 months.

CREX's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as FALC (100) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that CREX’s stock grew similarly to FALC’s over the last 12 months.

CREX's SMR Rating (100) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as FALC (100) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that CREX’s stock grew similarly to FALC’s over the last 12 months.

FALC's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Computer Communications industry is in the same range as CREX (64) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that FALC’s stock grew similarly to CREX’s over the last 12 months.

FALC's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the Computer Communications industry is in the same range as CREX (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that FALC’s stock grew similarly to CREX’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CREXFALC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
85%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CREX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FALC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MAIN65.821.09
+1.68%
Main Street Capital Corp
MDT91.96-0.09
-0.10%
Medtronic plc
CRCT5.75-0.04
-0.69%
Cricut
LXEO4.76-0.09
-1.86%
Lexeo Therapeutics
AERT0.75-0.02
-3.01%
Aeries Technology

CREX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CREX and GTM have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CREX and GTM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CREX
1D Price
Change %
CREX100%
N/A
GTM - CREX
31%
Poorly correlated
+1.35%
CRWD - CREX
30%
Poorly correlated
+4.59%
XYZ - CREX
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.75%
FIVN - CREX
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.18%
ZM - CREX
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.16%
More

FALC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FALC has been loosely correlated with WRDLY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FALC jumps, then WRDLY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FALC
1D Price
Change %
FALC100%
-1.60%
WRDLY - FALC
42%
Loosely correlated
-1.84%
WWLNF - FALC
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CXM - FALC
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.04%
CREX - FALC
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AI - FALC
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More