Ad is loading...
CREX
Price
$3.53
Change
+$0.23 (+6.97%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
FALC
Price
$1.61
Change
-$0.12 (-6.94%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
Ad is loading...

CREX vs FALC

Header iconCREX vs FALC Comparison
Open Charts CREX vs FALCBanner chart's image
Creative Realities
Price$3.53
Change+$0.23 (+6.97%)
Volume$83.78K
CapitalizationN/A
FalconStor Software
Price$1.61
Change-$0.12 (-6.94%)
Volume$230
CapitalizationN/A
CREX vs FALC Comparison Chart
Loading...
CREX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CREX vs. FALC commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CREX is a Sell and FALC is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (CREX: $3.53 vs. FALC: $1.61)
Brand notoriety: CREX and FALC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CREX: 161% vs. FALC: 5%
Market capitalization -- CREX: $38.97M vs. FALC: $9.61M
CREX [@Packaged Software] is valued at $38.97M. FALC’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $9.61M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.39B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CREX’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFALC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CREX’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FALC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CREX is a better buy in the long-term than FALC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CREX’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CREX’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

CREX (@Packaged Software) experienced а -17.72% price change this week, while FALC (@Packaged Software) price change was -6.68% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

CREX is expected to report earnings on May 15, 2023.

FALC is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-1.01% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CREX($39M) has a higher market cap than FALC($9.62M). CREX YTD gains are higher at: 49.576 vs. FALC (20.336). CREX has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.36M vs. FALC (-382.26K). CREX has more cash in the bank: 2.91M vs. FALC (1.84M). FALC has less debt than CREX: FALC (2.28M) vs CREX (14.6M). CREX has higher revenues than FALC: CREX (45.2M) vs FALC (10.3M).
CREXFALCCREX / FALC
Capitalization39M9.62M406%
EBITDA3.36M-382.26K-879%
Gain YTD49.57620.336244%
P/E Ratio14.95N/A-
Revenue45.2M10.3M439%
Total Cash2.91M1.84M158%
Total Debt14.6M2.28M639%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CREX vs FALC: Fundamental Ratings
CREX
FALC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
750
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
43
Fair valued
75
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
88100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6048
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1673
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CREX's Valuation (43) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as FALC (75) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that CREX’s stock grew similarly to FALC’s over the last 12 months.

CREX's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as FALC (100) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that CREX’s stock grew similarly to FALC’s over the last 12 months.

CREX's SMR Rating (88) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as FALC (100) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that CREX’s stock grew similarly to FALC’s over the last 12 months.

FALC's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Computer Communications industry is in the same range as CREX (60) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that FALC’s stock grew similarly to CREX’s over the last 12 months.

CREX's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the Information Technology Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FALC (73) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that CREX’s stock grew somewhat faster than FALC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CREX
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
86%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CREX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JRSH3.30N/A
N/A
Jerash Holdings (US)
ACT34.03-0.11
-0.32%
Enact Holdings
AXON599.35-5.21
-0.86%
Axon Enterprise
SBH13.41-0.37
-2.69%
Sally Beauty Holdings
JSPR20.43-1.67
-7.56%
Jasper Therapeutics

CREX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CREX and CLSK have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CREX and CLSK's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CREX
1D Price
Change %
CREX100%
+6.97%
CLSK - CREX
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.36%
RIOT - CREX
27%
Poorly correlated
+4.26%
LAW - CREX
27%
Poorly correlated
-3.52%
EEFT - CREX
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.30%
ALRM - CREX
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.13%
More

FALC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FALC has been loosely correlated with WRDLY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FALC jumps, then WRDLY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FALC
1D Price
Change %
FALC100%
-6.68%
WRDLY - FALC
42%
Loosely correlated
+3.64%
WWLNF - FALC
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CXM - FALC
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.90%
CREX - FALC
24%
Poorly correlated
+6.97%
AI - FALC
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.48%
More