It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CRGO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNPEHF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CRGO’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NPEHF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
CRGO (@Air Freight/Couriers) experienced а +24.49% price change this week, while NPEHF (@Air Freight/Couriers) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Air Freight/Couriers industry was -1.04%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.45%.
CRGO is expected to report earnings on Mar 01, 2023.
The Air Freight/Couriers industry operates air transportation and recurring delivery services. This includes companies offering same-day deliveries, scheduled delivery and logistical services. The proliferation of e-commerce/online retail with a growing emphasis on faster delivery has expanded opportunities for this industry, and induced more competition. United Parcel Service, Inc., FedEx Corporation and Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. are some of the major companies in this industry.
CRGO | NPEHF | CRGO / NPEHF | |
Capitalization | 118M | 5.25B | 2% |
EBITDA | -62.38M | 303B | -0% |
Gain YTD | -26.727 | -5.777 | 463% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | 6.74 | - |
Revenue | 20.3M | 2.55T | 0% |
Total Cash | 51.7M | 310B | 0% |
Total Debt | 1.3M | 632B | 0% |
CRGO | NPEHF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago56% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago43% | 2 days ago40% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago65% | N/A |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago50% | N/A |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago47% | 2 days ago22% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago41% | 2 days ago20% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago69% | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago82% | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago33% | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago50% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
ACARX | 33.72 | N/A | N/A |
Alger Capital Appreciation Instl R | |||
MVGIX | 16.79 | -0.07 | -0.42% |
MFS Low Volatility Global Equity I | |||
LEXCX | 63.37 | -0.36 | -0.56% |
Voya Corporate Leaders Trust B | |||
JVLIX | 26.10 | -0.21 | -0.80% |
JHancock Disciplined Value I | |||
FEMAX | 11.73 | -0.15 | -1.26% |
First Eagle U.S. SMID Cap Opportunity A |
A.I.dvisor tells us that CRGO and RLGT have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CRGO and RLGT's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CRGO | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CRGO | 100% | +2.09% | ||
RLGT - CRGO | 25% Poorly correlated | -2.24% | ||
GXO - CRGO | 18% Poorly correlated | -1.22% | ||
LSTR - CRGO | 17% Poorly correlated | -2.29% | ||
CYRX - CRGO | 16% Poorly correlated | +5.44% | ||
NPEHF - CRGO | 16% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that NPEHF and JANL have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NPEHF and JANL's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NPEHF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
NPEHF | 100% | N/A | ||
JANL - NPEHF | 20% Poorly correlated | +12.52% | ||
CRGO - NPEHF | 16% Poorly correlated | +2.09% | ||
TTNMF - NPEHF | 1% Poorly correlated | -1.20% | ||
QUBHF - NPEHF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
DHLGY - NPEHF | -2% Poorly correlated | -2.78% | ||
More |