CRH
Price
$94.94
Change
+$0.47 (+0.50%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
59.37B
31 days until earnings call
HLBZF
Price
$236.94
Change
+$13.79 (+6.18%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
15.13B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CRH vs HLBZF

Header iconCRH vs HLBZF Comparison
Open Charts CRH vs HLBZFBanner chart's image
CRH Public
Price$94.94
Change+$0.47 (+0.50%)
Volume$2.93M
Capitalization59.37B
HEIDELBERG MATERIALS AG
Price$236.94
Change+$13.79 (+6.18%)
Volume$6
Capitalization15.13B
CRH vs HLBZF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CRH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HLBZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CRH vs. HLBZF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRH is a StrongBuy and HLBZF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CRH: $94.94 vs. HLBZF: $236.94)
Brand notoriety: CRH and HLBZF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CRH: 67% vs. HLBZF: 0%
Market capitalization -- CRH: $59.37B vs. HLBZF: $15.13B
CRH [@Construction Materials] is valued at $59.37B. HLBZF’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $15.13B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $59.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $8.92B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CRH’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileHLBZF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CRH’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • HLBZF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, CRH is a better buy in the long-term than HLBZF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CRH’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HLBZF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CRH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • HLBZF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CRH is a better buy in the short-term than HLBZF.

Price Growth

CRH (@Construction Materials) experienced а +6.59% price change this week, while HLBZF (@Construction Materials) price change was +5.42% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was +2.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.20%.

Reported Earning Dates

CRH is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

HLBZF is expected to report earnings on Mar 25, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (+2.80% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CRH($59.4B) has a higher market cap than HLBZF($15.1B). CRH has higher P/E ratio than HLBZF: CRH (19.60) vs HLBZF (8.46). HLBZF YTD gains are higher at: 88.797 vs. CRH (3.421). CRH has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.02B vs. HLBZF (3.77B). CRH has more cash in the bank: 6.34B vs. HLBZF (1.75B). HLBZF has less debt than CRH: HLBZF (8.71B) vs CRH (13B). CRH has higher revenues than HLBZF: CRH (34.9B) vs HLBZF (21.1B).
CRHHLBZFCRH / HLBZF
Capitalization59.4B15.1B393%
EBITDA6.02B3.77B160%
Gain YTD3.42188.7974%
P/E Ratio19.608.46232%
Revenue34.9B21.1B165%
Total Cash6.34B1.75B363%
Total Debt13B8.71B149%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CRH vs HLBZF: Fundamental Ratings
CRH
HLBZF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5044
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
17
Undervalued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
169
SMR RATING
1..100
5395
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4837
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
297
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HLBZF's Valuation (16) in the null industry is in the same range as CRH (17) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that HLBZF’s stock grew similarly to CRH’s over the last 12 months.

HLBZF's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the null industry is in the same range as CRH (16) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that HLBZF’s stock grew similarly to CRH’s over the last 12 months.

CRH's SMR Rating (53) in the Construction Materials industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HLBZF (95) in the null industry. This means that CRH’s stock grew somewhat faster than HLBZF’s over the last 12 months.

HLBZF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as CRH (48) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that HLBZF’s stock grew similarly to CRH’s over the last 12 months.

HLBZF's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the null industry is in the same range as CRH (29) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that HLBZF’s stock grew similarly to CRH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CRHHLBZF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
52%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
48%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
49%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CRH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HLBZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GLOW28.550.25
+0.88%
VictoryShares WestEnd Global Equity ETF
GQI53.570.39
+0.73%
Natixis Gateway Quality Income ETF
FLAX26.220.11
+0.40%
Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF
IBB130.000.45
+0.35%
iShares Biotechnology ETF
EWI48.21-0.08
-0.17%
iShares MSCI Italy ETF

CRH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRH has been closely correlated with KNF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CRH jumps, then KNF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CRH
1D Price
Change %
CRH100%
+0.50%
KNF - CRH
72%
Closely correlated
-0.75%
EXP - CRH
71%
Closely correlated
+0.21%
VMC - CRH
70%
Closely correlated
+0.20%
MLM - CRH
67%
Closely correlated
-0.14%
TGLS - CRH
60%
Loosely correlated
+2.00%
More

HLBZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HLBZF and BRKWF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HLBZF and BRKWF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HLBZF
1D Price
Change %
HLBZF100%
+6.18%
BRKWF - HLBZF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HDLMY - HLBZF
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.28%
VMC - HLBZF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.20%
BCC - HLBZF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.64%
CRH - HLBZF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.50%
More