CRH
Price
$92.54
Change
-$0.26 (-0.28%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
59.37B
75 days until earnings call
SMID
Price
$30.37
Change
+$0.69 (+2.32%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
247.2M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CRH vs SMID

Header iconCRH vs SMID Comparison
Open Charts CRH vs SMIDBanner chart's image
CRH Public
Price$92.54
Change-$0.26 (-0.28%)
Volume$2.15M
Capitalization59.37B
Smith-Midland
Price$30.37
Change+$0.69 (+2.32%)
Volume$17.31K
Capitalization247.2M
CRH vs SMID Comparison Chart
Loading...
CRH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMID
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CRH vs. SMID commentary
Jun 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRH is a StrongBuy and SMID is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 07, 2025
Stock price -- (CRH: $92.54 vs. SMID: $30.37)
Brand notoriety: CRH and SMID are both not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CRH: 42% vs. SMID: 155%
Market capitalization -- CRH: $59.37B vs. SMID: $247.2M
CRH [@Construction Materials] is valued at $59.37B. SMID’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $247.2M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $59.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $8.92B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CRH’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSMID’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CRH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SMID’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CRH is a better buy in the long-term than SMID.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CRH’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SMID’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CRH’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SMID’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CRH is a better buy in the short-term than SMID.

Price Growth

CRH (@Construction Materials) experienced а +1.51% price change this week, while SMID (@Construction Materials) price change was +0.76% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was +1.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.35%.

Reported Earning Dates

CRH is expected to report earnings on Aug 21, 2025.

SMID is expected to report earnings on May 27, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (+1.05% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CRH($59.4B) has a higher market cap than SMID($247M). SMID has higher P/E ratio than CRH: SMID (427.45) vs CRH (19.60). CRH YTD gains are higher at: 0.807 vs. SMID (-31.691). CRH has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.02B vs. SMID (3.43M). CRH has more cash in the bank: 6.34B vs. SMID (5.85M). SMID has less debt than CRH: SMID (5.94M) vs CRH (13B). CRH has higher revenues than SMID: CRH (34.9B) vs SMID (57.7M).
CRHSMIDCRH / SMID
Capitalization59.4B247M24,049%
EBITDA6.02B3.43M175,495%
Gain YTD0.807-31.691-3%
P/E Ratio19.60427.455%
Revenue34.9B57.7M60,485%
Total Cash6.34B5.85M108,309%
Total Debt13B5.94M218,782%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CRH vs SMID: Fundamental Ratings
CRH
SMID
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5811
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
17
Undervalued
70
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1451
SMR RATING
1..100
5249
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5783
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
34100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CRH's Valuation (17) in the Construction Materials industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SMID (70) in the null industry. This means that CRH’s stock grew somewhat faster than SMID’s over the last 12 months.

CRH's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the Construction Materials industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SMID (51) in the null industry. This means that CRH’s stock grew somewhat faster than SMID’s over the last 12 months.

SMID's SMR Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as CRH (52) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that SMID’s stock grew similarly to CRH’s over the last 12 months.

CRH's Price Growth Rating (57) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as SMID (83) in the null industry. This means that CRH’s stock grew similarly to SMID’s over the last 12 months.

CRH's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the Construction Materials industry is significantly better than the same rating for SMID (100) in the null industry. This means that CRH’s stock grew significantly faster than SMID’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CRHSMID
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CRH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMID
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FIVCX34.190.38
+1.12%
Macquarie Opportunity C
RLISX23.750.24
+1.02%
Russell Inv Equity Income S
HGOAX58.92N/A
N/A
Hartford Growth Opportunities A
MRJIX10.77N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Multi-Asset Real Return I
MVISX40.80N/A
N/A
Patient Opportunity IS

SMID and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMID has been loosely correlated with BCC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SMID jumps, then BCC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMID
1D Price
Change %
SMID100%
+2.32%
BCC - SMID
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.77%
USLM - SMID
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.17%
EXP - SMID
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.40%
CRH - SMID
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.28%
KNF - SMID
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.05%
More