CRH
Price
$97.75
Change
+$2.16 (+2.26%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
59.37B
39 days until earnings call
SMID
Price
$40.95
Change
+$0.01 (+0.02%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
247.2M
Ad is loading...

CRH vs SMID

Header iconCRH vs SMID Comparison
Open Charts CRH vs SMIDBanner chart's image
CRH Public
Price$97.75
Change+$2.16 (+2.26%)
Volume$3.86M
Capitalization59.37B
Smith-Midland
Price$40.95
Change+$0.01 (+0.02%)
Volume$15.11K
Capitalization247.2M
CRH vs SMID Comparison Chart
Loading...
CRH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMID
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CRH vs. SMID commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRH is a Hold and SMID is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (CRH: $97.75 vs. SMID: $40.95)
Brand notoriety: CRH and SMID are both not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CRH: 115% vs. SMID: 59%
Market capitalization -- CRH: $59.37B vs. SMID: $247.2M
CRH [@Construction Materials] is valued at $59.37B. SMID’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $247.2M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $59.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $8.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CRH’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSMID’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CRH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SMID’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CRH is a better buy in the long-term than SMID.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CRH’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SMID’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CRH’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SMID’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CRH is a better buy in the short-term than SMID.

Price Growth

CRH (@Construction Materials) experienced а +6.50% price change this week, while SMID (@Construction Materials) price change was +5.19% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was +1.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.70%.

Reported Earning Dates

CRH is expected to report earnings on May 09, 2025.

SMID is expected to report earnings on Apr 17, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (+1.68% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CRH($59.4B) has a higher market cap than SMID($247M). SMID has higher P/E ratio than CRH: SMID (427.45) vs CRH (19.60). CRH YTD gains are higher at: 5.653 vs. SMID (-7.895). CRH has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.02B vs. SMID (3.43M). CRH has more cash in the bank: 6.34B vs. SMID (5.85M). SMID has less debt than CRH: SMID (5.94M) vs CRH (13B). CRH has higher revenues than SMID: CRH (34.9B) vs SMID (57.7M).
CRHSMIDCRH / SMID
Capitalization59.4B247M24,049%
EBITDA6.02B3.43M175,495%
Gain YTD5.653-7.895-72%
P/E Ratio19.60427.455%
Revenue34.9B57.7M60,485%
Total Cash6.34B5.85M108,309%
Total Debt13B5.94M218,782%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CRH vs SMID: Fundamental Ratings
CRH
SMID
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8761
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
17
Undervalued
77
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
631
SMR RATING
1..100
5451
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4244
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
54100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CRH's Valuation (17) in the Construction Materials industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SMID (77) in the null industry. This means that CRH’s stock grew somewhat faster than SMID’s over the last 12 months.

CRH's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as SMID (31) in the null industry. This means that CRH’s stock grew similarly to SMID’s over the last 12 months.

SMID's SMR Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as CRH (54) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that SMID’s stock grew similarly to CRH’s over the last 12 months.

CRH's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as SMID (44) in the null industry. This means that CRH’s stock grew similarly to SMID’s over the last 12 months.

CRH's P/E Growth Rating (54) in the Construction Materials industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SMID (100) in the null industry. This means that CRH’s stock grew somewhat faster than SMID’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CRHSMID
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
80%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CRH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMID
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TSGMX15.420.14
+0.92%
Transamerica Sustainable Growth Eq R6
QKACX46.070.30
+0.66%
Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core R6
REGWX43.600.23
+0.53%
Victory RS Small Cap Growth C
INGFX32.310.10
+0.31%
Invesco Oppenheimer International Gr R5
BUFMX16.740.03
+0.18%
Buffalo Mid Cap Growth

CRH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRH has been closely correlated with EXP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CRH jumps, then EXP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CRH
1D Price
Change %
CRH100%
+2.26%
EXP - CRH
70%
Closely correlated
+0.95%
VMC - CRH
67%
Closely correlated
+0.35%
MLM - CRH
65%
Loosely correlated
+2.13%
KNF - CRH
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.59%
SUM - CRH
63%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More

SMID and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMID has been loosely correlated with BCC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SMID jumps, then BCC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMID
1D Price
Change %
SMID100%
+0.02%
BCC - SMID
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.38%
EXP - SMID
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.95%
CRH - SMID
34%
Loosely correlated
+2.26%
VMC - SMID
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.35%
KNF - SMID
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.59%
More