Advertisement
CRHKF vs CRHKY
To understand the difference between China Resources Beer (Holdings) Company Limited (CRHKF) vs. China Resources Beer (Holdings) Company Limited - ADR (CRHKY) it is enough to know the definitions of ADR
ADR - American depositary receipt (ADR) is a certificate issued by a U.S. depositary bank representing a specified number of shares (often 1 share) of a foreign company's stock. ADRs are denominated in U.S. dollars and trade on U.S. stock markets and OTC depending on the ADRs classification.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CRHKF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCRHKY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CRHKF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- CRHKY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CRHKF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CRHKY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CRHKF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
- CRHKY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CRHKF (@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CRHKY (@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy) price change was -0.07% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy industry was -1.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.78%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.38%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy (-1.28% weekly)The meat, fish, and dairy food industry processes livestock, fish and milk products for consumer consumption. Some companies also process dairy byproducts. Tyson Foods, Inc., Hormel Foods Corporation and Pilgrims Pride Corp. are some of the biggest producers in this industry. Many of these companies are recipients of American farm subsidies. On the other hand, new-age food innovation like plant-based meat substitutes (which are designed to simulate chicken, beef, and pork sausage) could potentially augur disruptions and/or create new competition in this space.
| CRHKF | CRHKY | CRHKF / CRHKY | |
| Capitalization | 11.7B | 11.7B | 100% |
| EBITDA | N/A | 9.08B | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.671 | 10.342 | 248% |
| P/E Ratio | 13.02 | 14.30 | 91% |
| Revenue | N/A | 38.6B | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | N/A | - |
CRHKF | CRHKY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 26 | 25 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 23 Undervalued | 28 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 52 | 38 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 28 | 51 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CRHKF's Valuation (23) in the null industry is in the same range as CRHKY (28). This means that CRHKF’s stock grew similarly to CRHKY’s over the last 12 months.
CRHKF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CRHKY (100). This means that CRHKF’s stock grew similarly to CRHKY’s over the last 12 months.
CRHKY's SMR Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as CRHKF (52). This means that CRHKY’s stock grew similarly to CRHKF’s over the last 12 months.
CRHKY's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as CRHKF (58). This means that CRHKY’s stock grew similarly to CRHKF’s over the last 12 months.
CRHKF's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the null industry is in the same range as CRHKY (51). This means that CRHKF’s stock grew similarly to CRHKY’s over the last 12 months.
| CRHKF | CRHKY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 25% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 20% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 25% | 2 days ago 68% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 29% | 2 days ago 69% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 16% | 2 days ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 23% | 2 days ago 66% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 6 days ago 66% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 4% | 2 days ago 81% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| SILJ | 22.78 | 0.41 | +1.83% |
| Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF | |||
| QRFT | 60.44 | 0.22 | +0.36% |
| QRAFT AI-Enhanced US Large Cap ETF | |||
| LSVD | 28.41 | 0.02 | +0.08% |
| LSV Disciplined Value ETF | |||
| AVNM | 70.49 | -0.12 | -0.17% |
| Avantis All International Mkts Eq ETF | |||
| SAUG | 24.61 | -0.06 | -0.22% |
| FT Vest U.S. Sm Cp Mod Buf ETF -Aug | |||
CRHKF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRHKF has been loosely correlated with SVIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CRHKF jumps, then SVIN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CRHKF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRHKF | 100% | N/A | ||
| SVIN - CRHKF | 34% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| DVDCF - CRHKF | 7% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CABGY - CRHKF | 5% Poorly correlated | +0.40% | ||
| DGEAF - CRHKF | 3% Poorly correlated | -1.42% | ||
| CRHKY - CRHKF | 1% Poorly correlated | -1.23% | ||
More | ||||
CRHKY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRHKY has been loosely correlated with BDWBY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CRHKY jumps, then BDWBY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CRHKY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRHKY | 100% | -1.23% | ||
| BDWBY - CRHKY | 49% Loosely correlated | +3.82% | ||
| TSGTY - CRHKY | 47% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| PRNDY - CRHKY | 37% Loosely correlated | -0.22% | ||
| REMYY - CRHKY | 33% Poorly correlated | -1.44% | ||
| CABGY - CRHKY | 32% Poorly correlated | +0.40% | ||
More | ||||