CRHKF
Price
$3.31
Change
-$0.40 (-10.78%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
20.78B
DWWEF
Price
$0.14
Change
-$0.02 (-12.50%)
Updated
Jun 24 closing price
Capitalization
38.98M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CRHKF vs DWWEF

Header iconCRHKF vs DWWEF Comparison
Open Charts CRHKF vs DWWEFBanner chart's image
China Resources Beer Holdings
Price$3.31
Change-$0.40 (-10.78%)
Volume$250
Capitalization20.78B
Diamond Estates Wines & Spirits
Price$0.14
Change-$0.02 (-12.50%)
Volume$100
Capitalization38.98M
CRHKF vs DWWEF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CRHKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DWWEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CRHKF vs. DWWEF commentary
Jul 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRHKF is a Hold and DWWEF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 03, 2025
Stock price -- (CRHKF: $3.31 vs. DWWEF: $0.14)
Brand notoriety: CRHKF and DWWEF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Beverages: Alcoholic industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CRHKF: 178% vs. DWWEF: 3%
Market capitalization -- CRHKF: $20.78B vs. DWWEF: $38.98M
CRHKF [@Beverages: Alcoholic] is valued at $20.78B. DWWEF’s [@Beverages: Alcoholic] market capitalization is $38.98M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Beverages: Alcoholic] industry ranges from $19.33T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Beverages: Alcoholic] industry is $21.7B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CRHKF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileDWWEF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CRHKF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • DWWEF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CRHKF is a better buy in the long-term than DWWEF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CRHKF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DWWEF’s TA Score has 0 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CRHKF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • DWWEF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CRHKF is a better buy in the short-term than DWWEF.

Price Growth

CRHKF (@Beverages: Alcoholic) experienced а -10.66% price change this week, while DWWEF (@Beverages: Alcoholic) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Alcoholic industry was +1.54%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.26%.

Reported Earning Dates

CRHKF is expected to report earnings on Apr 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Beverages: Alcoholic (+1.54% weekly)

The alcoholic beverage market includes beer, wine, and spirits. From $230 billion in 2015, the industry has grown to around $250 billion by 2019. In recent years, alcoholic beverage makers have been looking to expand distribution and purchase channels, such as through online stores (e.g. e-commerce platform Drizly) and convenience stores. Anheuser-Busch In Bev and Diageo are major global alcoholic beverage companies, while U.S.-owned companies include Constellation Brands and Brown-Forman Corp. among several others.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CRHKF($20.8B) has a higher market cap than DWWEF($39M). CRHKF YTD gains are higher at: 26.996 vs. DWWEF (-9.051). CRHKF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.51B vs. DWWEF (-264.02K). CRHKF has more cash in the bank: 14.4B vs. DWWEF (616K). DWWEF has less debt than CRHKF: DWWEF (26.9M) vs CRHKF (949M). CRHKF has higher revenues than DWWEF: CRHKF (34.8B) vs DWWEF (27M).
CRHKFDWWEFCRHKF / DWWEF
Capitalization20.8B39M53,333%
EBITDA5.51B-264.02K-2,086,584%
Gain YTD26.996-9.051-298%
P/E Ratio34.01N/A-
Revenue34.8B27M128,889%
Total Cash14.4B616K2,337,662%
Total Debt949M26.9M3,528%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CRHKF vs DWWEF: Fundamental Ratings
CRHKF
DWWEF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9399
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
29
Undervalued
94
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
5493
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5280
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3512
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CRHKF's Valuation (29) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DWWEF (94). This means that CRHKF’s stock grew somewhat faster than DWWEF’s over the last 12 months.

CRHKF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as DWWEF (100). This means that CRHKF’s stock grew similarly to DWWEF’s over the last 12 months.

CRHKF's SMR Rating (54) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DWWEF (93). This means that CRHKF’s stock grew somewhat faster than DWWEF’s over the last 12 months.

CRHKF's Price Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as DWWEF (80). This means that CRHKF’s stock grew similarly to DWWEF’s over the last 12 months.

DWWEF's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the null industry is in the same range as CRHKF (35). This means that DWWEF’s stock grew similarly to CRHKF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CRHKFDWWEF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
17%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
20%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
31%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
22%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
12%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
22%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CRHKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DWWEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HBB18.810.80
+4.44%
Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Company
WKC29.560.55
+1.90%
World Kinect Corp
FUSB12.990.24
+1.88%
First US Bancshares
UFPI106.481.01
+0.96%
UFP Industries
TBRG22.66-0.82
-3.49%
TruBridge

CRHKF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRHKF has been loosely correlated with SVIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CRHKF jumps, then SVIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CRHKF
1D Price
Change %
CRHKF100%
-10.66%
SVIN - CRHKF
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
DVDCF - CRHKF
7%
Poorly correlated
+4.44%
CABGY - CRHKF
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.38%
DGEAF - CRHKF
3%
Poorly correlated
+2.51%
CRHKY - CRHKF
1%
Poorly correlated
+3.02%
More

DWWEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DWWEF and CWGL have been poorly correlated (+1% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DWWEF and CWGL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DWWEF
1D Price
Change %
DWWEF100%
N/A
CWGL - DWWEF
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.36%
CABJF - DWWEF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CBYDF - DWWEF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CRHKF - DWWEF
-1%
Poorly correlated
-10.66%
CRBBF - DWWEF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More