CRHKY
Price
$6.98
Change
-$0.03 (-0.43%)
Updated
Oct 24 closing price
Capitalization
11.27B
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
TSGTF
Price
$6.53
Change
-$0.46 (-6.58%)
Updated
Oct 23 closing price
Capitalization
11.12B
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CRHKY vs TSGTF

Header iconCRHKY vs TSGTF Comparison
Open Charts CRHKY vs TSGTFBanner chart's image
China Resources Beer Holdings
Price$6.98
Change-$0.03 (-0.43%)
Volume$23.56K
Capitalization11.27B
Tsingtao Brewery
Price$6.53
Change-$0.46 (-6.58%)
Volume$741
Capitalization11.12B
CRHKY vs TSGTF Comparison Chart in %
CRHKY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TSGTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CRHKY vs. TSGTF commentary
Oct 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRHKY is a Buy and TSGTF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 27, 2025
Stock price -- (CRHKY: $6.98 vs. TSGTF: $6.53)
Brand notoriety: CRHKY and TSGTF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CRHKY: 88% vs. TSGTF: 70%
Market capitalization -- CRHKY: $11.27B vs. TSGTF: $11.12B
CRHKY [@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy] is valued at $11.27B. TSGTF’s [@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy] market capitalization is $11.12B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy] industry ranges from $119.68B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy] industry is $22.8B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CRHKY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTSGTF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CRHKY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TSGTF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CRHKY is a better buy in the long-term than TSGTF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CRHKY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TSGTF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CRHKY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TSGTF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TSGTF is a better buy in the short-term than CRHKY.

Price Growth

CRHKY (@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy) experienced а +1.34% price change this week, while TSGTF (@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy) price change was +0.65% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy industry was -0.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.34%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy (-0.42% weekly)

The meat, fish, and dairy food industry processes livestock, fish and milk products for consumer consumption. Some companies also process dairy byproducts. Tyson Foods, Inc., Hormel Foods Corporation and Pilgrims Pride Corp. are some of the biggest producers in this industry. Many of these companies are recipients of American farm subsidies. On the other hand, new-age food innovation like plant-based meat substitutes (which are designed to simulate chicken, beef, and pork sausage) could potentially augur disruptions and/or create new competition in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CRHKY($11.3B) and TSGTF($11.1B) have the same market capitalization . CRHKY (13.90) and TSGTF (13.79) have similar P/E ratio . CRHKY YTD gains are higher at: 7.008 vs. TSGTF (-4.016). CRHKY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 9.08B vs. TSGTF (7.47B). CRHKY has higher revenues than TSGTF: CRHKY (38.6B) vs TSGTF (32.6B).
CRHKYTSGTFCRHKY / TSGTF
Capitalization11.3B11.1B102%
EBITDA9.08B7.47B122%
Gain YTD7.008-4.016-175%
P/E Ratio13.9013.79101%
Revenue38.6B32.6B118%
Total CashN/A22B-
Total DebtN/A118M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CRHKY vs TSGTF: Fundamental Ratings
CRHKY
TSGTF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
24
Undervalued
18
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
3953
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5957
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6955
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TSGTF's Valuation (18) in the null industry is in the same range as CRHKY (24). This means that TSGTF’s stock grew similarly to CRHKY’s over the last 12 months.

TSGTF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CRHKY (100). This means that TSGTF’s stock grew similarly to CRHKY’s over the last 12 months.

CRHKY's SMR Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as TSGTF (53). This means that CRHKY’s stock grew similarly to TSGTF’s over the last 12 months.

TSGTF's Price Growth Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as CRHKY (59). This means that TSGTF’s stock grew similarly to CRHKY’s over the last 12 months.

TSGTF's P/E Growth Rating (55) in the null industry is in the same range as CRHKY (69). This means that TSGTF’s stock grew similarly to CRHKY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CRHKYTSGTF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
76%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
71%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CRHKY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TSGTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IGI16.690.02
+0.13%
Western Asset Investment Grade Opportunity Trust Inc
INOV33.610.03
+0.08%
Innovator Intl Dev Pwr Bffr ETF - Nov
USCL78.95N/A
N/A
iShares Climate Conscious &TrnMSCIUSAETF
KBWP118.49-0.01
-0.01%
Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Ins ETF
WEEI21.07-0.18
-0.82%
Westwood Salient Enhanced Engy Inc ETF

CRHKY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRHKY has been loosely correlated with BDWBY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CRHKY jumps, then BDWBY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CRHKY
1D Price
Change %
CRHKY100%
-0.39%
BDWBY - CRHKY
49%
Loosely correlated
N/A
TSGTY - CRHKY
47%
Loosely correlated
N/A
PRNDY - CRHKY
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.15%
REMYY - CRHKY
33%
Poorly correlated
-0.78%
CABGY - CRHKY
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.20%
More

TSGTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TSGTF and CRHKY have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TSGTF and CRHKY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TSGTF
1D Price
Change %
TSGTF100%
N/A
CRHKY - TSGTF
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.39%
CABJF - TSGTF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BDWBY - TSGTF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BDWBF - TSGTF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TSGTY - TSGTF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More