Advertisement
CRHKY vs TSGTF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRHKY is a Hold and TSGTF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CRHKY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTSGTF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CRHKY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- TSGTF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CRHKY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TSGTF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CRHKY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- TSGTF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
CRHKY (@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy) experienced а -0.07% price change this week, while TSGTF (@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy) price change was +0.92% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy industry was -1.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.78%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.38%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy (-1.28% weekly)The meat, fish, and dairy food industry processes livestock, fish and milk products for consumer consumption. Some companies also process dairy byproducts. Tyson Foods, Inc., Hormel Foods Corporation and Pilgrims Pride Corp. are some of the biggest producers in this industry. Many of these companies are recipients of American farm subsidies. On the other hand, new-age food innovation like plant-based meat substitutes (which are designed to simulate chicken, beef, and pork sausage) could potentially augur disruptions and/or create new competition in this space.
| CRHKY | TSGTF | CRHKY / TSGTF | |
| Capitalization | 11.7B | 11.1B | 105% |
| EBITDA | 9.08B | 6.34B | 143% |
| Gain YTD | 11.721 | -2.870 | -408% |
| P/E Ratio | 14.46 | 13.84 | 104% |
| Revenue | 38.6B | 32.5B | 119% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 21.1B | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | 115M | - |
CRHKY | TSGTF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 25 | 23 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 28 Undervalued | 21 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 38 | 53 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | 54 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | 43 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TSGTF's Valuation (21) in the null industry is in the same range as CRHKY (28). This means that TSGTF’s stock grew similarly to CRHKY’s over the last 12 months.
TSGTF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CRHKY (100). This means that TSGTF’s stock grew similarly to CRHKY’s over the last 12 months.
CRHKY's SMR Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as TSGTF (53). This means that CRHKY’s stock grew similarly to TSGTF’s over the last 12 months.
CRHKY's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as TSGTF (54). This means that CRHKY’s stock grew similarly to TSGTF’s over the last 12 months.
TSGTF's P/E Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as CRHKY (51). This means that TSGTF’s stock grew similarly to CRHKY’s over the last 12 months.
| CRHKY | TSGTF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 51% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 62% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 70% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 61% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 66% | 16 days ago 60% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 20 days ago 56% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | N/A |
Advertisement
CRHKY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRHKY has been loosely correlated with BDWBY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CRHKY jumps, then BDWBY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CRHKY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRHKY | 100% | -0.55% | ||
| BDWBY - CRHKY | 49% Loosely correlated | +2.66% | ||
| TSGTY - CRHKY | 47% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| PRNDY - CRHKY | 37% Loosely correlated | -2.71% | ||
| REMYY - CRHKY | 33% Poorly correlated | -3.38% | ||
| CABGY - CRHKY | 32% Poorly correlated | -1.51% | ||
More | ||||
TSGTF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that TSGTF and CRHKY have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TSGTF and CRHKY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TSGTF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TSGTF | 100% | N/A | ||
| CRHKY - TSGTF | 28% Poorly correlated | -0.55% | ||
| CABJF - TSGTF | 27% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| BDWBY - TSGTF | 25% Poorly correlated | +2.66% | ||
| BDWBF - TSGTF | 25% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| TSGTY - TSGTF | 13% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||