Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CRIHX vs NLSAX
CRIHX vs NLSAX Comparison
Open Charts CRIHX vs NLSAX
CRM Long/Short Opportunities Instl
Price$12.53
Change+$0.26 (+2.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets299.94M
Neuberger Berman Long Short A
Price$19.64
Change-$0.02 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.54B
CRIHX vs NLSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CRIHX vs. NLSAX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRIHX is a Hold and NLSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSAX has more cash in the bank: 7.54B vs. CRIHX (300M). CRIHX pays higher dividends than NLSAX: CRIHX (0.96) vs NLSAX (0.00). CRIHX was incepted earlier than NLSAX: CRIHX (9 years) vs NLSAX (14 years). CRIHX (2.43) is less costly to investors than NLSAX (1.68). CRIHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 113.00 vs. NLSAX (48.00). NLSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CRIHX: NLSAX (1000) vs CRIHX (10000). NLSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.48 vs. CRIHX (-4.72). NLSAX return over 5 years is better than : 23.55 vs. CRIHX (19.31).
| CRIHX | NLSAX | CRIHX / NLSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.27 | 1.68 | 135% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 1.68 | 145% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.793 | 6.392 | -44% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 1000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 300M | 7.54B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.96 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.72 | 9.48 | -50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.46 | 19.24 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.31 | 23.55 | 82% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 54.65 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement