Ad is loading...
CRIHX vs NLSAX
CRIHX vs NLSAX Comparison
Open Charts CRIHX vs NLSAX
CRM Long/Short Opportunities Instl
Price$11.74
Change+$0.10 (+0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets225.54M
Neuberger Berman Long Short A
Price$18.83
Change-$0.01 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.33B
CRIHX vs NLSAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CRIHX vs. NLSAX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRIHX is a Buy and NLSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSAX has more cash in the bank: 7.33B vs. CRIHX (226M). CRIHX pays higher dividends than NLSAX: CRIHX (1.03) vs NLSAX (0.00). CRIHX was incepted earlier than NLSAX: CRIHX (9 years) vs NLSAX (13 years). CRIHX (2.43) is less costly to investors than NLSAX (1.68). CRIHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 113.00 vs. NLSAX (48.00). NLSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CRIHX: NLSAX (1000) vs CRIHX (10000). NLSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.86 vs. CRIHX (-9.92). NLSAX return over 5 years is better than : 30.31 vs. CRIHX (23.34).
| CRIHX | NLSAX | CRIHX / NLSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.27 | 1.68 | 135% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 1.68 | 145% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.697 | 2.059 | -471% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 1000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 226M | 7.33B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.03 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.92 | 6.86 | -145% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.71 | 15.84 | 42% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.34 | 30.31 | 77% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 41.58 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...