Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CRIHX vs NLSCX
CRIHX vs NLSCX Comparison
Open Charts CRIHX vs NLSCX
CRM Long/Short Opportunities Instl
Price$12.53
Change+$0.26 (+2.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets299.94M
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.74
Change+$0.03 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.54B
CRIHX vs NLSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CRIHX vs. NLSCX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRIHX is a Hold and NLSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 7.54B vs. CRIHX (300M). CRIHX pays higher dividends than NLSCX: CRIHX (0.96) vs NLSCX (0.00). CRIHX was incepted earlier than NLSCX: CRIHX (9 years) vs NLSCX (14 years). CRIHX (2.43) and NLSCX (2.43) have similar cost to investors . CRIHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 113.00 vs. NLSCX (48.00). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CRIHX: NLSCX (1000) vs CRIHX (10000). NLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.83 vs. CRIHX (-4.72). CRIHX (19.31) and NLSCX (18.83) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CRIHX | NLSCX | CRIHX / NLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.27 | 2.43 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 2.43 | 100% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.793 | 5.936 | -47% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 1000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 300M | 7.54B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.96 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.72 | 8.83 | -53% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.46 | 16.55 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.31 | 18.83 | 103% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 43.23 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement