CRLFF
Price
$5.12
Change
-$0.04 (-0.78%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
824.19M
CTARF
Price
$2.10
Change
-$0.01 (-0.47%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
2.28M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CRLFF vs CTARF

Header iconCRLFF vs CTARF Comparison
Open Charts CRLFF vs CTARFBanner chart's image
Cardinal Energy
Price$5.12
Change-$0.04 (-0.78%)
Volume$24.16K
Capitalization824.19M
Centaurus Energy
Price$2.10
Change-$0.01 (-0.47%)
Volume$342
Capitalization2.28M
CRLFF vs CTARF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CRLFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CTARF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CRLFF vs. CTARF commentary
Aug 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRLFF is a Hold and CTARF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 17, 2025
Stock price -- (CRLFF: $5.12 vs. CTARF: $2.10)
Brand notoriety: CRLFF and CTARF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CRLFF: 28% vs. CTARF: 65%
Market capitalization -- CRLFF: $824.19M vs. CTARF: $2.28M
CRLFF [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $824.19M. CTARF’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $2.28M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $119.06B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $3.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CRLFF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCTARF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CRLFF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CTARF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CRLFF is a better buy in the long-term than CTARF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CRLFF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CTARF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CRLFF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CTARF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CTARF is a better buy in the short-term than CRLFF.

Price Growth

CRLFF (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а -0.70% price change this week, while CTARF (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was +2.44% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was -0.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.96%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.29%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (-0.15% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CRLFF($824M) has a higher market cap than CTARF($2.29M). CRLFF has higher P/E ratio than CTARF: CRLFF (12.80) vs CTARF (2.73). CRLFF YTD gains are higher at: 13.667 vs. CTARF (7.692). CRLFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 226M vs. CTARF (-581K). CTARF has less debt than CRLFF: CTARF (3.73M) vs CRLFF (199M). CRLFF has higher revenues than CTARF: CRLFF (578M) vs CTARF (0).
CRLFFCTARFCRLFF / CTARF
Capitalization824M2.29M36,061%
EBITDA226M-581K-38,898%
Gain YTD13.6677.692178%
P/E Ratio12.802.73469%
Revenue578M0-
Total CashN/A101K-
Total Debt199M3.73M5,335%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CRLFF vs CTARF: Fundamental Ratings
CRLFF
CTARF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8132
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
7
Undervalued
46
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
38100
SMR RATING
1..100
7090
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4949
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2468
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CRLFF's Valuation (7) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CTARF (46). This means that CRLFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CTARF’s over the last 12 months.

CRLFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CTARF (100). This means that CRLFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CTARF’s over the last 12 months.

CRLFF's SMR Rating (70) in the null industry is in the same range as CTARF (90). This means that CRLFF’s stock grew similarly to CTARF’s over the last 12 months.

CRLFF's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as CTARF (49). This means that CRLFF’s stock grew similarly to CTARF’s over the last 12 months.

CRLFF's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CTARF (68). This means that CRLFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CTARF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CRLFFCTARF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
72%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CRLFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CTARF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MSJAX19.27N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Global Endurance A
SCNSX19.43N/A
N/A
Allspring Common Stock Inst
FZAOX34.55N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Z
EGLNX10.46N/A
N/A
Eagle Energy Infrastructure N
DHLRX33.68-0.04
-0.12%
Diamond Hill Large Cap I

CRLFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRLFF has been closely correlated with ZPTAF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CRLFF jumps, then ZPTAF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CRLFF
1D Price
Change %
CRLFF100%
-0.68%
ZPTAF - CRLFF
76%
Closely correlated
-0.48%
BTE - CRLFF
74%
Closely correlated
-0.50%
TNEYF - CRLFF
73%
Closely correlated
+1.37%
VET - CRLFF
72%
Closely correlated
-1.64%
OBE - CRLFF
71%
Closely correlated
-1.93%
More

CTARF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CTARF and BEPTF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CTARF and BEPTF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CTARF
1D Price
Change %
CTARF100%
-0.47%
BEPTF - CTARF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CVONF - CTARF
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DLKGF - CTARF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DMEHF - CTARF
4%
Poorly correlated
+1.11%
CRLFF - CTARF
0%
Poorly correlated
-0.68%
More