CRLFF
Price
$5.63
Change
+$0.08 (+1.44%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
Capitalization
905.01M
DMEHF
Price
$0.25
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
Capitalization
22.93M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CRLFF vs DMEHF

Header iconCRLFF vs DMEHF Comparison
Open Charts CRLFF vs DMEHFBanner chart's image
Cardinal Energy
Price$5.63
Change+$0.08 (+1.44%)
Volume$48.93K
Capitalization905.01M
Desert Mountain Energy
Price$0.25
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$60.19K
Capitalization22.93M
CRLFF vs DMEHF Comparison Chart in %
CRLFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DMEHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CRLFF vs. DMEHF commentary
Oct 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRLFF is a Hold and DMEHF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CRLFF: $5.63 vs. DMEHF: $0.25)
Brand notoriety: CRLFF and DMEHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CRLFF: 170% vs. DMEHF: 69%
Market capitalization -- CRLFF: $905.01M vs. DMEHF: $22.93M
CRLFF [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $905.01M. DMEHF’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $22.93M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $117.6B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $3.71B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CRLFF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileDMEHF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CRLFF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • DMEHF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CRLFF is a better buy in the long-term than DMEHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CRLFF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DMEHF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CRLFF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • DMEHF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CRLFF and DMEHF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CRLFF (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а -2.51% price change this week, while DMEHF (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was +23.59% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was +0.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was +40.74%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (+0.22% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CRLFF($905M) has a higher market cap than DMEHF($22.9M). CRLFF YTD gains are higher at: 24.878 vs. DMEHF (14.258). CRLFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 226M vs. DMEHF (-3.39M). CRLFF has higher revenues than DMEHF: CRLFF (578M) vs DMEHF (258K).
CRLFFDMEHFCRLFF / DMEHF
Capitalization905M22.9M3,952%
EBITDA226M-3.39M-6,676%
Gain YTD24.87814.258174%
P/E Ratio14.28N/A-
Revenue578M258K224,031%
Total CashN/A376K-
Total Debt199MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CRLFF vs DMEHF: Fundamental Ratings
CRLFF
DMEHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
8
Undervalued
57
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
36100
SMR RATING
1..100
7294
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4537
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
12100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CRLFF's Valuation (8) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DMEHF (57). This means that CRLFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than DMEHF’s over the last 12 months.

CRLFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (36) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DMEHF (100). This means that CRLFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than DMEHF’s over the last 12 months.

CRLFF's SMR Rating (72) in the null industry is in the same range as DMEHF (94). This means that CRLFF’s stock grew similarly to DMEHF’s over the last 12 months.

DMEHF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as CRLFF (45). This means that DMEHF’s stock grew similarly to CRLFF’s over the last 12 months.

CRLFF's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for DMEHF (100). This means that CRLFF’s stock grew significantly faster than DMEHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CRLFFDMEHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CRLFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DMEHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NGENF3.030.47
+18.17%
NervGen Pharma Corp.
NNOCF0.150.01
+8.19%
Nanoco Group Plc
BZLFY16.890.72
+4.45%
Bunzl plc
VMCUF11.00N/A
N/A
Valuence Merger Corp. I
AUTLF5.32N/A
N/A
Austal Ltd.

CRLFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRLFF has been closely correlated with ZPTAF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CRLFF jumps, then ZPTAF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CRLFF
1D Price
Change %
CRLFF100%
+1.53%
ZPTAF - CRLFF
76%
Closely correlated
+0.89%
BTE - CRLFF
74%
Closely correlated
+4.41%
TNEYF - CRLFF
73%
Closely correlated
+0.92%
VET - CRLFF
72%
Closely correlated
+5.82%
OBE - CRLFF
71%
Closely correlated
+3.38%
More

DMEHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DMEHF and DKDRF have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DMEHF and DKDRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DMEHF
1D Price
Change %
DMEHF100%
-1.62%
DKDRF - DMEHF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DTNOY - DMEHF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CRLFF - DMEHF
5%
Poorly correlated
+1.53%
CTARF - DMEHF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DALXF - DMEHF
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.10%
More