CRLFF
Price
$4.36
Change
-$0.06 (-1.36%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
FRHLF
Price
$8.86
Change
-$0.24 (-2.64%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
Ad is loading...

CRLFF vs FRHLF

Header iconCRLFF vs FRHLF Comparison
Open Charts CRLFF vs FRHLFBanner chart's image
Cardinal Energy
Price$4.36
Change-$0.06 (-1.36%)
Volume$55.58K
CapitalizationN/A
Freehold Royalties
Price$8.86
Change-$0.24 (-2.64%)
Volume$181.97K
CapitalizationN/A
CRLFF vs FRHLF Comparison Chart
Loading...
CRLFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FRHLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CRLFF vs. FRHLF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRLFF is a Sell and FRHLF is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (CRLFF: $4.36 vs. FRHLF: $8.85)
Brand notoriety: CRLFF and FRHLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CRLFF: 151% vs. FRHLF: 434%
Market capitalization -- CRLFF: $745.9M vs. FRHLF: $1.58B
CRLFF [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $745.9M. FRHLF’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $1.58B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $151.38B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $4.08B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CRLFF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFRHLF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CRLFF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FRHLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CRLFF is a better buy in the long-term than FRHLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CRLFF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FRHLF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CRLFF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • FRHLF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FRHLF is a better buy in the short-term than CRLFF.

Price Growth

CRLFF (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а -3.19% price change this week, while FRHLF (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was -4.72% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was +46.66%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.17%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (+46.66% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRHLF($1.58B) has a higher market cap than CRLFF($746M). FRHLF has higher P/E ratio than CRLFF: FRHLF (13.19) vs CRLFF (5.06). CRLFF YTD gains are higher at: -8.246 vs. FRHLF (-14.444). FRHLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 370M vs. CRLFF (318M). CRLFF has less debt than FRHLF: CRLFF (49.1M) vs FRHLF (161M). CRLFF has higher revenues than FRHLF: CRLFF (601M) vs FRHLF (382M).
CRLFFFRHLFCRLFF / FRHLF
Capitalization746M1.58B47%
EBITDA318M370M86%
Gain YTD-8.246-14.44457%
P/E Ratio5.0613.1938%
Revenue601M382M157%
Total CashN/A508K-
Total Debt49.1M161M30%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CRLFF vs FRHLF: Fundamental Ratings
CRLFF
FRHLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6954
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
7
Undervalued
18
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3839
SMR RATING
1..100
6457
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7376
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1077
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9520

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CRLFF's Valuation (7) in the null industry is in the same range as FRHLF (18). This means that CRLFF’s stock grew similarly to FRHLF’s over the last 12 months.

CRLFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as FRHLF (39). This means that CRLFF’s stock grew similarly to FRHLF’s over the last 12 months.

FRHLF's SMR Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as CRLFF (64). This means that FRHLF’s stock grew similarly to CRLFF’s over the last 12 months.

CRLFF's Price Growth Rating (73) in the null industry is in the same range as FRHLF (76). This means that CRLFF’s stock grew similarly to FRHLF’s over the last 12 months.

CRLFF's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FRHLF (77). This means that CRLFF’s stock grew significantly faster than FRHLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CRLFFFRHLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 27 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CRLFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FRHLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CVSI0.03N/A
+1.93%
CV Sciences, Inc.
ANCTF56.26-0.07
-0.13%
Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc.
YAMCY7.00-0.06
-0.85%
Yamaha Corp.
FSNUY8.91-0.21
-2.30%
Fresenius SE & Co. KGaA
YGRAF0.67-0.02
-3.20%
Yangarra Resources Ltd.

CRLFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRLFF has been closely correlated with ZPTAF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CRLFF jumps, then ZPTAF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CRLFF
1D Price
Change %
CRLFF100%
-1.44%
ZPTAF - CRLFF
76%
Closely correlated
-1.34%
VRN - CRLFF
74%
Closely correlated
-0.43%
BTE - CRLFF
74%
Closely correlated
-1.27%
SPGYF - CRLFF
74%
Closely correlated
-2.18%
TNEYF - CRLFF
73%
Closely correlated
-1.91%
More

FRHLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRHLF has been closely correlated with BTE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FRHLF jumps, then BTE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRHLF
1D Price
Change %
FRHLF100%
-2.55%
BTE - FRHLF
72%
Closely correlated
-1.27%
CRLFF - FRHLF
70%
Closely correlated
-1.44%
VRN - FRHLF
69%
Closely correlated
-0.43%
SPGYF - FRHLF
68%
Closely correlated
-2.18%
VET - FRHLF
68%
Closely correlated
-0.77%
More