CRLFF
Price
$4.92
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
745.9M
IPCFF
Price
$16.43
Change
+$0.03 (+0.18%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
1.18B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CRLFF vs IPCFF

Header iconCRLFF vs IPCFF Comparison
Open Charts CRLFF vs IPCFFBanner chart's image
Cardinal Energy
Price$4.92
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$11.31K
Capitalization745.9M
International Petroleum Corp. CDA
Price$16.43
Change+$0.03 (+0.18%)
Volume$35.01K
Capitalization1.18B
CRLFF vs IPCFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CRLFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IPCFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CRLFF vs. IPCFF commentary
Jul 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRLFF is a Hold and IPCFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 04, 2025
Stock price -- (CRLFF: $4.93 vs. IPCFF: $16.43)
Brand notoriety: CRLFF and IPCFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CRLFF: 5% vs. IPCFF: 9%
Market capitalization -- CRLFF: $745.9M vs. IPCFF: $1.18B
CRLFF [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $745.9M. IPCFF’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $1.18B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $151.38B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $4.27B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CRLFF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileIPCFF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CRLFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • IPCFF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CRLFF is a better buy in the long-term than IPCFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CRLFF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IPCFF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CRLFF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • IPCFF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CRLFF is a better buy in the short-term than IPCFF.

Price Growth

CRLFF (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а -0.55% price change this week, while IPCFF (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was +1.48% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was +0.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.46%.

Reported Earning Dates

CRLFF is expected to report earnings on May 08, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (+0.42% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IPCFF($1.18B) has a higher market cap than CRLFF($746M). IPCFF has higher P/E ratio than CRLFF: IPCFF (5.72) vs CRLFF (5.06). IPCFF YTD gains are higher at: 41.394 vs. CRLFF (9.338). IPCFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 558M vs. CRLFF (318M). CRLFF has less debt than IPCFF: CRLFF (49.1M) vs IPCFF (297M). IPCFF has higher revenues than CRLFF: IPCFF (1.14B) vs CRLFF (601M).
CRLFFIPCFFCRLFF / IPCFF
Capitalization746M1.18B63%
EBITDA318M558M57%
Gain YTD9.33841.39423%
P/E Ratio5.065.7288%
Revenue601M1.14B53%
Total CashN/A378M-
Total Debt49.1M297M17%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CRLFF vs IPCFF: Fundamental Ratings
CRLFF
IPCFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7627
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
8
Undervalued
76
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
399
SMR RATING
1..100
6073
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5042
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
669
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CRLFF's Valuation (8) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for IPCFF (76). This means that CRLFF’s stock grew significantly faster than IPCFF’s over the last 12 months.

IPCFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the null industry is in the same range as CRLFF (39). This means that IPCFF’s stock grew similarly to CRLFF’s over the last 12 months.

CRLFF's SMR Rating (60) in the null industry is in the same range as IPCFF (73). This means that CRLFF’s stock grew similarly to IPCFF’s over the last 12 months.

IPCFF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as CRLFF (50). This means that IPCFF’s stock grew similarly to CRLFF’s over the last 12 months.

IPCFF's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CRLFF (66). This means that IPCFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CRLFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CRLFFIPCFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CRLFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IPCFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPMWX8.930.05
+0.53%
Invesco SteelPath MLP Select 40 R
UBVLX85.00N/A
N/A
Undiscovered Managers Behavioral Val L
VOLMX24.09N/A
N/A
Volumetric
ECFVX19.56N/A
N/A
Eaton Vance Focused Value Opps C
CGJAX69.95N/A
N/A
Calvert US Large Cap Growth Rspnb Idx A

IPCFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IPCFF has been loosely correlated with CRGY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IPCFF jumps, then CRGY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IPCFF
1D Price
Change %
IPCFF100%
N/A
CRGY - IPCFF
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.11%
NOG - IPCFF
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.50%
MUR - IPCFF
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.57%
EOG - IPCFF
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.22%
CRLFF - IPCFF
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.18%
More