CRLFF
Price
$5.12
Change
-$0.04 (-0.78%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
824.19M
NUVSF
Price
$10.20
Change
-$0.12 (-1.16%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
2.02B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CRLFF vs NUVSF

Header iconCRLFF vs NUVSF Comparison
Open Charts CRLFF vs NUVSFBanner chart's image
Cardinal Energy
Price$5.12
Change-$0.04 (-0.78%)
Volume$24.16K
Capitalization824.19M
NuVista Energy
Price$10.20
Change-$0.12 (-1.16%)
Volume$21.92K
Capitalization2.02B
CRLFF vs NUVSF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CRLFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NUVSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CRLFF vs. NUVSF commentary
Aug 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRLFF is a Hold and NUVSF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 16, 2025
Stock price -- (CRLFF: $5.12 vs. NUVSF: $10.20)
Brand notoriety: CRLFF and NUVSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CRLFF: 28% vs. NUVSF: 10%
Market capitalization -- CRLFF: $824.19M vs. NUVSF: $2.02B
CRLFF [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $824.19M. NUVSF’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $2.02B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $119.06B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $3.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CRLFF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNUVSF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CRLFF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NUVSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CRLFF is a better buy in the long-term than NUVSF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CRLFF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NUVSF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CRLFF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NUVSF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CRLFF is a better buy in the short-term than NUVSF.

Price Growth

CRLFF (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а -0.70% price change this week, while NUVSF (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was -2.30% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was -0.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.96%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.29%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (-0.15% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NUVSF($2.02B) has a higher market cap than CRLFF($824M). CRLFF has higher P/E ratio than NUVSF: CRLFF (12.80) vs NUVSF (8.20). CRLFF YTD gains are higher at: 13.667 vs. NUVSF (6.963). NUVSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 831M vs. CRLFF (226M). CRLFF has less debt than NUVSF: CRLFF (199M) vs NUVSF (281M). NUVSF has higher revenues than CRLFF: NUVSF (1.28B) vs CRLFF (578M).
CRLFFNUVSFCRLFF / NUVSF
Capitalization824M2.02B41%
EBITDA226M831M27%
Gain YTD13.6676.963196%
P/E Ratio12.808.20156%
Revenue578M1.28B45%
Total CashN/A2.68M-
Total Debt199M281M71%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CRLFF vs NUVSF: Fundamental Ratings
CRLFF
NUVSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8157
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
7
Undervalued
62
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3818
SMR RATING
1..100
7051
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4950
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2454
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CRLFF's Valuation (7) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NUVSF (62). This means that CRLFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NUVSF’s over the last 12 months.

NUVSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the null industry is in the same range as CRLFF (38). This means that NUVSF’s stock grew similarly to CRLFF’s over the last 12 months.

NUVSF's SMR Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as CRLFF (70). This means that NUVSF’s stock grew similarly to CRLFF’s over the last 12 months.

CRLFF's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as NUVSF (50). This means that CRLFF’s stock grew similarly to NUVSF’s over the last 12 months.

CRLFF's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the null industry is in the same range as NUVSF (54). This means that CRLFF’s stock grew similarly to NUVSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CRLFFNUVSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CRLFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NUVSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FZAOX34.55N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Z
MSJAX19.27N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Global Endurance A
SCNSX19.43N/A
N/A
Allspring Common Stock Inst
EGLNX10.46N/A
N/A
Eagle Energy Infrastructure N
DHLRX33.68-0.04
-0.12%
Diamond Hill Large Cap I

CRLFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRLFF has been closely correlated with ZPTAF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CRLFF jumps, then ZPTAF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CRLFF
1D Price
Change %
CRLFF100%
-0.68%
ZPTAF - CRLFF
76%
Closely correlated
-0.48%
BTE - CRLFF
74%
Closely correlated
-0.50%
TNEYF - CRLFF
73%
Closely correlated
+1.37%
VET - CRLFF
72%
Closely correlated
-1.64%
OBE - CRLFF
71%
Closely correlated
-1.93%
More

NUVSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NUVSF has been loosely correlated with PRMRF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NUVSF jumps, then PRMRF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NUVSF
1D Price
Change %
NUVSF100%
-1.13%
PRMRF - NUVSF
63%
Loosely correlated
-1.07%
CRLFF - NUVSF
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.68%
MEGEF - NUVSF
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.26%
TNEYF - NUVSF
57%
Loosely correlated
+1.37%
BTE - NUVSF
57%
Loosely correlated
-0.50%
More