CRLFF
Price
$4.25
Change
-$0.10 (-2.29%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
OILSF
Price
$1.38
Change
-$0.03 (-2.13%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
Ad is loading...

CRLFF vs OILSF

Header iconCRLFF vs OILSF Comparison
Open Charts CRLFF vs OILSFBanner chart's image
Cardinal Energy
Price$4.25
Change-$0.10 (-2.29%)
Volume$60.29K
CapitalizationN/A
Saturn Oil & Gas
Price$1.38
Change-$0.03 (-2.13%)
Volume$35.1K
CapitalizationN/A
CRLFF vs OILSF Comparison Chart
Loading...
CRLFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OILSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CRLFF vs. OILSF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRLFF is a Sell and OILSF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (CRLFF: $4.26 vs. OILSF: $1.38)
Brand notoriety: CRLFF and OILSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CRLFF: 154% vs. OILSF: 119%
Market capitalization -- CRLFF: $745.9M vs. OILSF: $276.11M
CRLFF [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $745.9M. OILSF’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $276.11M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $151.38B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $4.08B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CRLFF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileOILSF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CRLFF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • OILSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CRLFF is a better buy in the long-term than OILSF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CRLFF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OILSF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CRLFF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • OILSF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, OILSF is a better buy in the short-term than CRLFF.

Price Growth

CRLFF (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а -6.07% price change this week, while OILSF (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was -10.29% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was +47.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.10%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.55%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (+47.25% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CRLFF($746M) has a higher market cap than OILSF($276M). CRLFF has higher P/E ratio than OILSF: CRLFF (5.06) vs OILSF (0.35). CRLFF YTD gains are higher at: -10.383 vs. OILSF (-17.566). OILSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 507M vs. CRLFF (318M). CRLFF has less debt than OILSF: CRLFF (49.1M) vs OILSF (611M). CRLFF has higher revenues than OILSF: CRLFF (601M) vs OILSF (435M).
CRLFFOILSFCRLFF / OILSF
Capitalization746M276M270%
EBITDA318M507M63%
Gain YTD-10.383-17.56659%
P/E Ratio5.060.351,458%
Revenue601M435M138%
Total CashN/A25.1M-
Total Debt49.1M611M8%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CRLFF vs OILSF: Fundamental Ratings
CRLFF
OILSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7294
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
7
Undervalued
56
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
39100
SMR RATING
1..100
6429
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7481
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1041
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9585

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CRLFF's Valuation (7) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OILSF (56). This means that CRLFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than OILSF’s over the last 12 months.

CRLFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (39) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OILSF (100). This means that CRLFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than OILSF’s over the last 12 months.

OILSF's SMR Rating (29) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CRLFF (64). This means that OILSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CRLFF’s over the last 12 months.

CRLFF's Price Growth Rating (74) in the null industry is in the same range as OILSF (81). This means that CRLFF’s stock grew similarly to OILSF’s over the last 12 months.

CRLFF's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is in the same range as OILSF (41). This means that CRLFF’s stock grew similarly to OILSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CRLFFOILSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 28 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CRLFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OILSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AIG70.00-1.22
-1.71%
American International Group
TCI29.11-0.79
-2.64%
Transcontinental Realty Investors
R156.30-5.65
-3.49%
Ryder System
ULCC6.09-0.40
-6.16%
Frontier Group Holdings
LFWD1.50-0.11
-6.83%
Lifeward Ltd

CRLFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRLFF has been closely correlated with ZPTAF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CRLFF jumps, then ZPTAF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CRLFF
1D Price
Change %
CRLFF100%
-2.33%
ZPTAF - CRLFF
76%
Closely correlated
-3.70%
VRN - CRLFF
74%
Closely correlated
-3.44%
BTE - CRLFF
74%
Closely correlated
-3.42%
SPGYF - CRLFF
74%
Closely correlated
-2.38%
TNEYF - CRLFF
73%
Closely correlated
-2.11%
More

OILSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OILSF has been loosely correlated with VET. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OILSF jumps, then VET could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OILSF
1D Price
Change %
OILSF100%
-2.27%
VET - OILSF
60%
Loosely correlated
-4.00%
ZPTAF - OILSF
58%
Loosely correlated
-3.70%
CRLFF - OILSF
55%
Loosely correlated
-2.33%
VRN - OILSF
55%
Loosely correlated
-3.44%
JRNGF - OILSF
54%
Loosely correlated
-5.65%
More