CRLFF
Price
$5.24
Change
-$0.10 (-1.87%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
846.2M
PEYUF
Price
$13.23
Change
-$0.21 (-1.56%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
2.67B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CRLFF vs PEYUF

Header iconCRLFF vs PEYUF Comparison
Open Charts CRLFF vs PEYUFBanner chart's image
Cardinal Energy
Price$5.24
Change-$0.10 (-1.87%)
Volume$34.07K
Capitalization846.2M
Peyto Exploration & Development
Price$13.23
Change-$0.21 (-1.56%)
Volume$116.71K
Capitalization2.67B
CRLFF vs PEYUF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CRLFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PEYUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CRLFF vs. PEYUF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRLFF is a StrongBuy and PEYUF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CRLFF: $5.34 vs. PEYUF: $13.44)
Brand notoriety: CRLFF and PEYUF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CRLFF: 39% vs. PEYUF: 62%
Market capitalization -- CRLFF: $846.2M vs. PEYUF: $2.67B
CRLFF [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $846.2M. PEYUF’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $2.67B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $116.09B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $3.67B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CRLFF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePEYUF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CRLFF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PEYUF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, CRLFF is a better buy in the long-term than PEYUF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CRLFF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PEYUF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CRLFF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PEYUF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CRLFF is a better buy in the short-term than PEYUF.

Price Growth

CRLFF (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а -1.24% price change this week, while PEYUF (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was -1.83% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was -1.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.66%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (-1.11% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PEYUF($2.67B) has a higher market cap than CRLFF($846M). CRLFF has higher P/E ratio than PEYUF: CRLFF (13.14) vs PEYUF (11.06). CRLFF YTD gains are higher at: 16.331 vs. PEYUF (11.004). PEYUF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 902M vs. CRLFF (226M). CRLFF has less debt than PEYUF: CRLFF (199M) vs PEYUF (1.29B). PEYUF has higher revenues than CRLFF: PEYUF (1.01B) vs CRLFF (578M).
CRLFFPEYUFCRLFF / PEYUF
Capitalization846M2.67B32%
EBITDA226M902M25%
Gain YTD16.33111.004148%
P/E Ratio13.1411.06119%
Revenue578M1.01B57%
Total CashN/A31.7M-
Total Debt199M1.29B15%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CRLFF vs PEYUF: Fundamental Ratings
CRLFF
PEYUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1052
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
7
Undervalued
14
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3825
SMR RATING
1..100
7162
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4752
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1728
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
2850

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CRLFF's Valuation (7) in the null industry is in the same range as PEYUF (14). This means that CRLFF’s stock grew similarly to PEYUF’s over the last 12 months.

PEYUF's Profit vs Risk Rating (25) in the null industry is in the same range as CRLFF (38). This means that PEYUF’s stock grew similarly to CRLFF’s over the last 12 months.

PEYUF's SMR Rating (62) in the null industry is in the same range as CRLFF (71). This means that PEYUF’s stock grew similarly to CRLFF’s over the last 12 months.

CRLFF's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as PEYUF (52). This means that CRLFF’s stock grew similarly to PEYUF’s over the last 12 months.

CRLFF's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the null industry is in the same range as PEYUF (28). This means that CRLFF’s stock grew similarly to PEYUF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CRLFFPEYUF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CRLFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PEYUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
THIGX36.720.07
+0.19%
Thornburg Small/Mid Cap Growth I
RYOCX92.27N/A
N/A
Rydex NASDAQ-100® Inv
NPNRX49.98N/A
N/A
Neuberger Berman Large Cap Value R3
MSJAX19.41N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Global Endurance A
DCUAX14.85N/A
N/A
DWS CROCI US A

CRLFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRLFF has been closely correlated with ZPTAF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CRLFF jumps, then ZPTAF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CRLFF
1D Price
Change %
CRLFF100%
-1.91%
ZPTAF - CRLFF
76%
Closely correlated
-3.43%
BTE - CRLFF
74%
Closely correlated
-3.54%
TNEYF - CRLFF
73%
Closely correlated
-1.54%
VET - CRLFF
72%
Closely correlated
-2.67%
OBE - CRLFF
71%
Closely correlated
-3.31%
More

PEYUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PEYUF has been closely correlated with TRMLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PEYUF jumps, then TRMLF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PEYUF
1D Price
Change %
PEYUF100%
-1.55%
TRMLF - PEYUF
69%
Closely correlated
-1.27%
CRLFF - PEYUF
69%
Closely correlated
-1.91%
AETUF - PEYUF
66%
Closely correlated
-2.83%
BTE - PEYUF
66%
Loosely correlated
-3.54%
RRC - PEYUF
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.69%
More