Salesforce and HubSpot represent two distinct approaches to the customer relationship management (CRM) software market — one as the dominant enterprise-scale incumbent and the other as a fast-growing challenger focused on the mid-market. Both companies have attracted intense investor scrutiny in recent months as the software sector grapples with questions about how artificial intelligence will reshape business models, pricing structures, and competitive moats. This comparison is particularly relevant for investors weighing established profitability against high-growth potential, and for those seeking to understand how two CRM-focused companies with dramatically different scale and maturity profiles are navigating the same market headwinds. Both stocks have suffered significant drawdowns in 2026, creating a compelling backdrop for side-by-side evaluation.
Salesforce, headquartered in San Francisco, is the world's largest provider of cloud-based CRM software and enterprise applications. Its platform spans sales, service, marketing, commerce, analytics, and integration tools, serving hundreds of thousands of organizations globally. In recent market activity, CRM shares have traded in the $155–$175 range, significantly below their 52-week high of $274.00 but above the 52-week low of $146.32. The stock's year-to-date decline of approximately 35% reflects a broader rotation away from software names, compounded by specific concerns around whether agentic AI (autonomous AI agents that perform tasks without human intervention) will disrupt the traditional per-seat licensing model that has driven Salesforce's revenue engine for two decades.
The company's most recent quarterly results (Q1 fiscal 2027, reported in late May 2026) exceeded analyst expectations, with revenue rising 13% year-over-year to $11.13 billion and earnings per share (EPS) of $3.88 comfortably beating the $3.13 consensus estimate. Salesforce also disclosed that its Agentforce AI platform reached $1.2 billion in annual recurring revenue (ARR), a 205% surge from the prior year. The company announced the $3.6 billion acquisition of Fin (formerly Intercom), an AI-powered customer service platform, to strengthen its agentic capabilities. Despite these positive metrics, several Wall Street firms — including KeyBanc and Bernstein — downgraded CRM in early July, citing survey data suggesting that enterprise AI adoption is progressing slower than headline figures imply. Guggenheim and Monness Crespi & Hardt, however, issued upgrades, creating a split analyst picture that underscores genuine uncertainty about the pace of AI monetization.
HubSpot, based in Cambridge, Massachusetts, provides a cloud-based CRM platform purpose-built for small-to-medium businesses (SMBs) and mid-market companies. Its product suite includes Marketing Hub, Sales Hub, Service Hub, and Content Hub, all designed to be accessible to organizations that lack the extensive IT resources of large enterprises. HUBS shares have experienced a punishing 2026, falling roughly 44% year-to-date and trading near $224 — far below the 52-week high of $568.16 and the all-time high of $881.13 reached in February 2025. The stock's 52-week low of $169.63 was touched in late June, after which a sharp recovery of over 26% in the past month has signaled renewed buying interest.
HubSpot's most recent annual results showed revenue of $3.13 billion for fiscal 2025, growing 19.2% year-over-year, with trailing twelve-month revenue now surpassing $3.3 billion. The company achieved GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) profitability with net income of approximately $100 million on a trailing basis, though its net margin of roughly 3% remains thin. HubSpot's forward P/E ratio of roughly 17.5 reflects expectations that profitability will continue to expand as the business scales. Short interest in HUBS remains notably elevated at approximately 15.7% of the float, indicating that a substantial portion of market participants is positioned for further downside. Analyst consensus remains at "Buy" with a price target near $276, implying roughly 23% upside from recent levels, though earnings results expected in early August 2026 represent a critical near-term catalyst.
For investors seeking an alternative to manual stock selection, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated selection of the platform's most effective AI-powered trading bots. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI trading bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers, but only the strongest performers — those best aligned with current market conditions — earn a spot in the Trending section. These bots employ a diverse range of trading styles, from short-term momentum strategies and swing trading to longer-term trend-following approaches, each with distinct performance statistics, win rates, and risk profiles. Some bots focus exclusively on specific sectors or market capitalizations, while others scan broadly across the market. The curated Trending AI Robots list allows traders to observe which strategies are currently thriving and to explore bots whose track records and methodologies align with their own objectives — whether that involves CRM, HUBS, or thousands of other equities.
Comparing these two CRM-focused companies reveals a study in contrasts across nearly every key dimension. In terms of scale, Salesforce's $41.5 billion in fiscal 2026 revenue dwarfs HubSpot's $3.3 billion, and CRM's market capitalization is roughly 12 times larger than that of HUBS. This scale gives Salesforce advantages in brand recognition, enterprise relationships, and the ability to fund large acquisitions — but it also means growth rates naturally trend lower as the law of large numbers takes hold.
On growth, HubSpot holds a clear advantage. Its revenue expansion in the 19–21% range outpaces Salesforce's 10–13%, reflecting HUBS's earlier-stage penetration into the vast SMB market and its ability to upsell existing customers into higher-tier hubs. Salesforce, by contrast, must increasingly rely on AI-driven product cycle acceleration and international expansion to re-energize growth.
The profitability picture is entirely different. CRM generates a net margin close to 19%, returns billions to shareholders through buybacks ($50 billion total authorized) and dividends (yielding roughly 1%), and trades at a trailing P/E near 20. HUBS operates at a slim net margin of roughly 3%, pays no dividend, and carries a trailing P/E above 118, reflecting that current earnings are minimal relative to its valuation. For investors prioritizing near-term earnings quality, CRM is the straightforward choice.
Regarding risk, both stocks face AI-related disruption concerns, but in different ways. Salesforce's risk centers on whether agentic AI will cannibalize its lucrative per-seat licensing model. HubSpot's risk is more existential: as a smaller player, any slowdown in SMB spending or increased competition from larger rivals could disproportionately impact its trajectory. HUBS's elevated short interest — above 15% of float — adds potential for both a sharp short squeeze on positive news or amplified selling pressure on negative developments.
On market sentiment, CRM faces a split analyst community with multiple recent downgrades alongside bullish upgrades, while HUBS maintains a consensus "Buy" rating with a significant implied upside, though the high short interest signals considerable skepticism about that upside being realized.
Based on observable trend data, relative stability metrics, and the alignment of near-term catalysts, Tickeron's AI would likely lean toward CRM in the current environment — though with measured conviction. Salesforce's combination of deep profitability, aggressive capital return programs, and a trailing P/E near 20 provides a valuation floor that HUBS simply does not possess at this stage. The 205% growth in Agentforce ARR, while facing legitimate questions about monetization speed, nevertheless demonstrates that Salesforce is generating tangible AI-related revenue at scale. CRM's recent price action, trading near its 50-day moving average after a prolonged decline, suggests the trend is beginning to stabilize. HubSpot's higher growth rate and lower valuation on a forward basis are appealing, but the elevated short interest and razor-thin profitability margin introduce additional layers of uncertainty. In a market environment where capital preservation and earnings visibility are being rewarded, the AI's probabilistic assessment would favor the established, cash-generative profile of Salesforce over HubSpot's higher-growth, higher-uncertainty setup — while acknowledging that both stocks could perform very differently depending on how the broader software sector's AI transition unfolds.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CRM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHUBS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CRM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HUBS’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
CRM (@Packaged Software) experienced а -9.12% price change this week, while HUBS (@Packaged Software) price change was -15.39% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -4.90%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was -13.02%.
CRM is expected to report earnings on Sep 02, 2026.
HUBS is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| CRM | HUBS | CRM / HUBS | |
| Capitalization | 129B | 10.5B | 1,229% |
| EBITDA | 13.7B | 267M | 5,131% |
| Gain YTD | -40.460 | -52.651 | 77% |
| P/E Ratio | 18.18 | 100.01 | 18% |
| Revenue | 42.8B | 3.3B | 1,298% |
| Total Cash | 11.8B | 1.69B | 698% |
| Total Debt | 41.9B | 247M | 16,964% |
CRM | HUBS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 14 | 12 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 14 Undervalued | 80 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 52 | 86 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 95 | 96 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CRM's Valuation (14) in the Packaged Software industry is significantly better than the same rating for HUBS (80) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CRM’s stock grew significantly faster than HUBS’s over the last 12 months.
CRM's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as HUBS (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CRM’s stock grew similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.
CRM's SMR Rating (52) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HUBS (86) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CRM’s stock grew somewhat faster than HUBS’s over the last 12 months.
CRM's Price Growth Rating (61) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as HUBS (61) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CRM’s stock grew similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.
CRM's P/E Growth Rating (95) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as HUBS (96) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CRM’s stock grew similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.
| CRM | HUBS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 44% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 70% | 9 days ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 78% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRM has been closely correlated with NOW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CRM jumps, then NOW could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CRM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRM | 100% | -3.72% | ||
| NOW - CRM | 78% Closely correlated | -3.69% | ||
| HUBS - CRM | 77% Closely correlated | -7.27% | ||
| WDAY - CRM | 75% Closely correlated | -3.44% | ||
| TEAM - CRM | 72% Closely correlated | -6.15% | ||
| FRSH - CRM | 71% Closely correlated | -2.88% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HUBS has been closely correlated with CRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HUBS jumps, then CRM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HUBS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HUBS | 100% | -7.27% | ||
| CRM - HUBS | 79% Closely correlated | -3.72% | ||
| TEAM - HUBS | 73% Closely correlated | -6.15% | ||
| ASAN - HUBS | 70% Closely correlated | -4.51% | ||
| DOCU - HUBS | 70% Closely correlated | -1.77% | ||
| BRZE - HUBS | 69% Closely correlated | -5.69% | ||
More | ||||