CRM
Price
$163.61
Change
+$6.68 (+4.26%)
Updated
Jul 24, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
128.53B
40 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
HUBS
Price
$204.93
Change
+$14.92 (+7.85%)
Updated
Jul 24, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
10.49B
12 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CRM vs HUBS

CRM vs HUBS Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 19, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Salesforce (CRM) vs. HubSpot (HUBS) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • CRM (Salesforce) is a large-cap enterprise software giant with a ~$140 billion market cap, while HUBS (HubSpot) is a mid-cap CRM platform provider valued at roughly $11.5 billion, creating a classic large-cap versus growth-oriented comparison.
  • Both stocks have experienced steep drawdowns year-to-date — CRM down approximately 35% and HUBS down roughly 44% — reflecting broad pressure on software valuations and AI-related disruption fears.
  • Salesforce generates significant profitability with a trailing P/E (price-to-earnings ratio) near 20 and a net margin approaching 19%, while HubSpot runs a much thinner net margin around 3% and carries a trailing P/E above 118.
  • HUBS has posted stronger top-line revenue growth (approximately 19–21% year-over-year) compared to CRM's ~10–13% pace, though Salesforce's AI-driven product momentum, including Agentforce, is accelerating.
  • Wall Street sentiment on both names has been mixed, with analyst downgrades for CRM tied to AI monetization uncertainty and persistent short interest in HUBS hovering near 15.7% of float.
  • Tickeron's AI-driven analysis evaluates the two stocks through trend consistency, volatility-adjusted momentum, and catalyst alignment, offering a probabilistic verdict on which currently presents the more favorable setup.

Introduction

Salesforce and HubSpot represent two distinct approaches to the customer relationship management (CRM) software market — one as the dominant enterprise-scale incumbent and the other as a fast-growing challenger focused on the mid-market. Both companies have attracted intense investor scrutiny in recent months as the software sector grapples with questions about how artificial intelligence will reshape business models, pricing structures, and competitive moats. This comparison is particularly relevant for investors weighing established profitability against high-growth potential, and for those seeking to understand how two CRM-focused companies with dramatically different scale and maturity profiles are navigating the same market headwinds. Both stocks have suffered significant drawdowns in 2026, creating a compelling backdrop for side-by-side evaluation.

CRM Overview and Recent Performance

Salesforce, headquartered in San Francisco, is the world's largest provider of cloud-based CRM software and enterprise applications. Its platform spans sales, service, marketing, commerce, analytics, and integration tools, serving hundreds of thousands of organizations globally. In recent market activity, CRM shares have traded in the $155–$175 range, significantly below their 52-week high of $274.00 but above the 52-week low of $146.32. The stock's year-to-date decline of approximately 35% reflects a broader rotation away from software names, compounded by specific concerns around whether agentic AI (autonomous AI agents that perform tasks without human intervention) will disrupt the traditional per-seat licensing model that has driven Salesforce's revenue engine for two decades.

The company's most recent quarterly results (Q1 fiscal 2027, reported in late May 2026) exceeded analyst expectations, with revenue rising 13% year-over-year to $11.13 billion and earnings per share (EPS) of $3.88 comfortably beating the $3.13 consensus estimate. Salesforce also disclosed that its Agentforce AI platform reached $1.2 billion in annual recurring revenue (ARR), a 205% surge from the prior year. The company announced the $3.6 billion acquisition of Fin (formerly Intercom), an AI-powered customer service platform, to strengthen its agentic capabilities. Despite these positive metrics, several Wall Street firms — including KeyBanc and Bernstein — downgraded CRM in early July, citing survey data suggesting that enterprise AI adoption is progressing slower than headline figures imply. Guggenheim and Monness Crespi & Hardt, however, issued upgrades, creating a split analyst picture that underscores genuine uncertainty about the pace of AI monetization.

HUBS Overview and Recent Performance

HubSpot, based in Cambridge, Massachusetts, provides a cloud-based CRM platform purpose-built for small-to-medium businesses (SMBs) and mid-market companies. Its product suite includes Marketing Hub, Sales Hub, Service Hub, and Content Hub, all designed to be accessible to organizations that lack the extensive IT resources of large enterprises. HUBS shares have experienced a punishing 2026, falling roughly 44% year-to-date and trading near $224 — far below the 52-week high of $568.16 and the all-time high of $881.13 reached in February 2025. The stock's 52-week low of $169.63 was touched in late June, after which a sharp recovery of over 26% in the past month has signaled renewed buying interest.

HubSpot's most recent annual results showed revenue of $3.13 billion for fiscal 2025, growing 19.2% year-over-year, with trailing twelve-month revenue now surpassing $3.3 billion. The company achieved GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) profitability with net income of approximately $100 million on a trailing basis, though its net margin of roughly 3% remains thin. HubSpot's forward P/E ratio of roughly 17.5 reflects expectations that profitability will continue to expand as the business scales. Short interest in HUBS remains notably elevated at approximately 15.7% of the float, indicating that a substantial portion of market participants is positioned for further downside. Analyst consensus remains at "Buy" with a price target near $276, implying roughly 23% upside from recent levels, though earnings results expected in early August 2026 represent a critical near-term catalyst.

Trending AI Robots

For investors seeking an alternative to manual stock selection, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated selection of the platform's most effective AI-powered trading bots. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI trading bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers, but only the strongest performers — those best aligned with current market conditions — earn a spot in the Trending section. These bots employ a diverse range of trading styles, from short-term momentum strategies and swing trading to longer-term trend-following approaches, each with distinct performance statistics, win rates, and risk profiles. Some bots focus exclusively on specific sectors or market capitalizations, while others scan broadly across the market. The curated Trending AI Robots list allows traders to observe which strategies are currently thriving and to explore bots whose track records and methodologies align with their own objectives — whether that involves CRM, HUBS, or thousands of other equities.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Comparing these two CRM-focused companies reveals a study in contrasts across nearly every key dimension. In terms of scale, Salesforce's $41.5 billion in fiscal 2026 revenue dwarfs HubSpot's $3.3 billion, and CRM's market capitalization is roughly 12 times larger than that of HUBS. This scale gives Salesforce advantages in brand recognition, enterprise relationships, and the ability to fund large acquisitions — but it also means growth rates naturally trend lower as the law of large numbers takes hold.

On growth, HubSpot holds a clear advantage. Its revenue expansion in the 19–21% range outpaces Salesforce's 10–13%, reflecting HUBS's earlier-stage penetration into the vast SMB market and its ability to upsell existing customers into higher-tier hubs. Salesforce, by contrast, must increasingly rely on AI-driven product cycle acceleration and international expansion to re-energize growth.

The profitability picture is entirely different. CRM generates a net margin close to 19%, returns billions to shareholders through buybacks ($50 billion total authorized) and dividends (yielding roughly 1%), and trades at a trailing P/E near 20. HUBS operates at a slim net margin of roughly 3%, pays no dividend, and carries a trailing P/E above 118, reflecting that current earnings are minimal relative to its valuation. For investors prioritizing near-term earnings quality, CRM is the straightforward choice.

Regarding risk, both stocks face AI-related disruption concerns, but in different ways. Salesforce's risk centers on whether agentic AI will cannibalize its lucrative per-seat licensing model. HubSpot's risk is more existential: as a smaller player, any slowdown in SMB spending or increased competition from larger rivals could disproportionately impact its trajectory. HUBS's elevated short interest — above 15% of float — adds potential for both a sharp short squeeze on positive news or amplified selling pressure on negative developments.

On market sentiment, CRM faces a split analyst community with multiple recent downgrades alongside bullish upgrades, while HUBS maintains a consensus "Buy" rating with a significant implied upside, though the high short interest signals considerable skepticism about that upside being realized.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable trend data, relative stability metrics, and the alignment of near-term catalysts, Tickeron's AI would likely lean toward CRM in the current environment — though with measured conviction. Salesforce's combination of deep profitability, aggressive capital return programs, and a trailing P/E near 20 provides a valuation floor that HUBS simply does not possess at this stage. The 205% growth in Agentforce ARR, while facing legitimate questions about monetization speed, nevertheless demonstrates that Salesforce is generating tangible AI-related revenue at scale. CRM's recent price action, trading near its 50-day moving average after a prolonged decline, suggests the trend is beginning to stabilize. HubSpot's higher growth rate and lower valuation on a forward basis are appealing, but the elevated short interest and razor-thin profitability margin introduce additional layers of uncertainty. In a market environment where capital preservation and earnings visibility are being rewarded, the AI's probabilistic assessment would favor the established, cash-generative profile of Salesforce over HubSpot's higher-growth, higher-uncertainty setup — while acknowledging that both stocks could perform very differently depending on how the broader software sector's AI transition unfolds.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
CRM vs. HUBS commentary
Jul 25, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRM is a StrongBuy and HUBS is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 25, 2026
Stock price -- (CRM: $156.93 vs. HUBS: $190.01)
Brand notoriety: CRM: Notable vs. HUBS: Not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CRM: 76% vs. HUBS: 117%
Market capitalization -- CRM: $128.53B vs. HUBS: $10.49B
CRM [@Packaged Software] is valued at $128.53B. HUBS’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $10.49B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $397.44B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $10.23B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CRM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHUBS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CRM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HUBS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CRM is a better buy in the long-term than HUBS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CRM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HUBS’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CRM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HUBS’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 8 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CRM is a better buy in the short-term than HUBS.

Price Growth

CRM (@Packaged Software) experienced а -9.12% price change this week, while HUBS (@Packaged Software) price change was -15.39% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -4.90%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was -13.02%.

Reported Earning Dates

CRM is expected to report earnings on Sep 02, 2026.

HUBS is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-4.90% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CRM($129B) has a higher market cap than HUBS($10.5B). HUBS has higher P/E ratio than CRM: HUBS (100.01) vs CRM (18.18). CRM YTD gains are higher at: -40.460 vs. HUBS (-52.651). CRM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 13.7B vs. HUBS (267M). CRM has more cash in the bank: 11.8B vs. HUBS (1.69B). HUBS has less debt than CRM: HUBS (247M) vs CRM (41.9B). CRM has higher revenues than HUBS: CRM (42.8B) vs HUBS (3.3B).
CRMHUBSCRM / HUBS
Capitalization129B10.5B1,229%
EBITDA13.7B267M5,131%
Gain YTD-40.460-52.65177%
P/E Ratio18.18100.0118%
Revenue42.8B3.3B1,298%
Total Cash11.8B1.69B698%
Total Debt41.9B247M16,964%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CRM vs HUBS: Fundamental Ratings
CRM
HUBS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1412
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
14
Undervalued
80
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
5286
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6161
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9596
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CRM's Valuation (14) in the Packaged Software industry is significantly better than the same rating for HUBS (80) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CRM’s stock grew significantly faster than HUBS’s over the last 12 months.

CRM's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as HUBS (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CRM’s stock grew similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.

CRM's SMR Rating (52) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HUBS (86) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CRM’s stock grew somewhat faster than HUBS’s over the last 12 months.

CRM's Price Growth Rating (61) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as HUBS (61) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CRM’s stock grew similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.

CRM's P/E Growth Rating (95) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as HUBS (96) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CRM’s stock grew similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CRMHUBS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CRM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HUBS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TMO572.3245.86
+8.71%
Thermo Fisher Scientific
RAND10.200.05
+0.49%
Rand Capital Corp
MHK110.01-0.40
-0.36%
Mohawk Industries
WNEB14.15-0.19
-1.32%
Western New England Bancorp
AHCO10.47-0.41
-3.77%
AdaptHealth Corp

CRM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRM has been closely correlated with NOW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CRM jumps, then NOW could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CRM
1D Price
Change %
CRM100%
-3.72%
NOW - CRM
78%
Closely correlated
-3.69%
HUBS - CRM
77%
Closely correlated
-7.27%
WDAY - CRM
75%
Closely correlated
-3.44%
TEAM - CRM
72%
Closely correlated
-6.15%
FRSH - CRM
71%
Closely correlated
-2.88%
More

HUBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HUBS has been closely correlated with CRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HUBS jumps, then CRM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HUBS
1D Price
Change %
HUBS100%
-7.27%
CRM - HUBS
79%
Closely correlated
-3.72%
TEAM - HUBS
73%
Closely correlated
-6.15%
ASAN - HUBS
70%
Closely correlated
-4.51%
DOCU - HUBS
70%
Closely correlated
-1.77%
BRZE - HUBS
69%
Closely correlated
-5.69%
More