Advertisement
CLSK vs HUBS
Which Stock Would AI Choose? CleanSpark (CLSK) vs. HubSpot (HUBS) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- CleanSpark (CLSK), a bitcoin mining company, has shown strong momentum with shares rising significantly in recent weeks amid cryptocurrency strength and expansions into AI infrastructure.
- HubSpot (HUBS), a cloud-based CRM (customer relationship management) platform provider, benefits from recovering SaaS (software-as-a-service) sentiment but trades well below its 52-week high.
- CLSK exhibits higher volatility (beta of 3.72) compared to HUBS (beta of 1.23), reflecting its crypto exposure versus software stability.
- Market caps differ notably: CLSK at approximately $3.2 billion versus HUBS at $12.3 billion.
- Analyst price targets imply upside potential for both, with CLSK around $19 and HUBS near $345 from current levels.
- Recent developments highlight CLSK's operational growth in mining and data centers, while HUBS focuses on AI enhancements in its platform.
Introduction
CleanSpark (CLSK) and HubSpot (HUBS) represent distinct corners of the technology landscape: bitcoin mining tied to digital assets and energy infrastructure versus CRM software for business growth. This stock comparison is relevant for investors seeking diversification between high-volatility growth plays and more established SaaS models. Traders monitoring sector rotations—crypto surges versus software recoveries—will find value in analyzing their relative performance, risk profiles, and market positioning amid evolving economic conditions and AI-driven narratives.
CLSK Overview and Recent Performance
CleanSpark (CLSK) is a bitcoin mining company that owns and operates data centers powered by sustainable energy sources. In recent market activity, CLSK shares have experienced notable gains, with a roughly 40% rise over the past month driven by bitcoin price strength and operational expansions. Sentiment has been bolstered by announcements of increased mining capacity, Texas facility growth, and explorations into AI infrastructure, attracting attention from hyperscalers. Despite high volatility and negative profitability metrics (EPS of -1.06 TTM), year-to-date returns stand positive at around 25%, reflecting broader crypto sector momentum.
HUBS Overview and Recent Performance
HubSpot (HUBS) delivers a cloud-based CRM platform encompassing marketing, sales, service, and operations hubs, enhanced by AI tools like Breeze for automation and insights. Shares have shown stability with recent upticks amid positive SaaS sector sentiment, including gains following peer earnings and analyst upgrades. Trading around $240 after a 52-week range of $187 to $683, HUBS posted year-to-date returns of about 40%, supported by revenue growth to $3.13 billion TTM and improving profitability (EPS 0.86). Upcoming earnings and AI integrations have influenced cautious optimism, though macroeconomic pressures on software spending temper gains.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates the top performers from hundreds of AI trading bots that analyze and trade thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots employ diverse strategies—such as swing trading, pattern recognition, and TP/SL (take-profit/stop-loss) risk management—over timeframes from minutes to weeks, with stats including annualized returns up to 162%, win rates of 50-88%, profit factors from 1.5 to 7+, and favorable profit-to-drawdown ratios often exceeding 5:1. Selected for current market conditions like semiconductor booms and data center growth, they highlight bots excelling in volatile sectors. Explore these high-performing agents to enhance your trading approach.
Head-to-Head Comparison
CleanSpark (CLSK) and HubSpot (HUBS) diverge in business models: CLSK relies on bitcoin mining and energy efficiency for revenue, exposed to crypto volatility and halving events, while HUBS drives recurring subscriptions from CRM scalability. Growth drivers contrast sharply—CLSK leverages bitcoin rallies and AI data center pivots versus HUBS’s customer acquisition in a maturing SaaS market. Recent momentum favors CLSK with sharper gains, but HUBS offers lower risk through diversified revenue and positive cash flow. Sector exposure pits crypto/energy risks against software competition, with market sentiment tilting toward CLSK on crypto hype but HUBS on earnings stability.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently favors CleanSpark (CLSK) due to its superior trend consistency in recent market activity, operational catalysts in mining expansion and AI infrastructure, and alignment with high-momentum sectors like data centers. While HUBS provides relative stability, CLSK’s positioning suggests higher probability of near-term outperformance for growth-oriented strategies.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLSK is a Hold and HUBS is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CLSK’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHUBS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CLSK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- HUBS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CLSK’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HUBS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CLSK’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- HUBS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CLSK (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +0.45% price change this week, while HUBS (@Packaged Software) price change was -27.02% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +1.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.35%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -3.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +77.76%.
Reported Earning Dates
CLSK is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2026.
HUBS is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Banks/Brokers (+1.14% weekly)These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
@Packaged Software (-3.28% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| CLSK | HUBS | CLSK / HUBS | |
| Capitalization | 3.46B | 9.2B | 38% |
| EBITDA | 139M | 267M | 52% |
| Gain YTD | 33.103 | -55.250 | -60% |
| P/E Ratio | 7.38 | 94.52 | 8% |
| Revenue | 785M | 3.3B | 24% |
| Total Cash | 1.29B | 1.69B | 76% |
| Total Debt | 1.79B | 247M | 724% |
CLSK | HUBS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 25 | 71 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 69 Overvalued | 79 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 94 | 85 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | 88 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 85 | 97 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CLSK's Valuation (69) in the null industry is in the same range as HUBS (79) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CLSK’s stock grew similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.
CLSK's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as HUBS (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CLSK’s stock grew similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.
HUBS's SMR Rating (85) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as CLSK (94) in the null industry. This means that HUBS’s stock grew similarly to CLSK’s over the last 12 months.
CLSK's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HUBS (88) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CLSK’s stock grew somewhat faster than HUBS’s over the last 12 months.
CLSK's P/E Growth Rating (85) in the null industry is in the same range as HUBS (97) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CLSK’s stock grew similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.
| CLSK | HUBS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 1 day ago 68% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 1 day ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 86% | 1 day ago 68% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 82% | 1 day ago 69% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 1 day ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 1 day ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 9 days ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 89% | 1 day ago 71% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 1 day ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 1 day ago 75% |
Advertisement