It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CRM’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while.
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CRM’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
CRM (@Packaged Software) experienced а +1.63% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +3.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.16%.
CRM is expected to report earnings on Mar 04, 2025.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
CRM | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 76 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 66 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 32 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 69 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 29 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 94 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CRM | IGV | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago45% | 2 days ago83% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago77% | 2 days ago90% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago63% | 2 days ago77% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago57% | 2 days ago82% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago74% | 2 days ago90% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago72% | 2 days ago84% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 16 days ago76% | 8 days ago88% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago57% | 15 days ago80% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago61% | 2 days ago87% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago74% | 2 days ago90% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
FAB | 82.97 | 0.22 | +0.27% |
First Trust Multi Cap Val AlphaDEX® ETF | |||
TBLL | 105.51 | 0.01 | +0.01% |
Invesco Short Term Treasury ETF | |||
FLMI | 24.46 | -0.02 | -0.07% |
Franklin Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF | |||
BLKC | 23.43 | -0.12 | -0.51% |
Invesco Aln Glxy Blkh Usr&Dctrzd Cmr ETF | |||
EUO | 34.47 | -0.23 | -0.66% |
ProShares UltraShort Euro |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRM has been closely correlated with PATH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CRM jumps, then PATH could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CRM | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CRM | 100% | -0.79% | ||
PATH - CRM | 74% Closely correlated | +0.38% | ||
NOW - CRM | 69% Closely correlated | -0.58% | ||
NTNX - CRM | 61% Loosely correlated | -1.21% | ||
DSGX - CRM | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.64% | ||
CLSK - CRM | 55% Loosely correlated | -2.81% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IGV has been closely correlated with NOW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IGV jumps, then NOW could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IGV | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
IGV | 100% | N/A | ||
NOW - IGV | 78% Closely correlated | -0.58% | ||
INTU - IGV | 77% Closely correlated | +0.14% | ||
CDNS - IGV | 75% Closely correlated | +0.04% | ||
SNPS - IGV | 73% Closely correlated | -0.87% | ||
CRM - IGV | 73% Closely correlated | -0.79% | ||
More |