CRML
Price
$1.68
Change
+$0.06 (+3.73%)
Updated
Apr 24, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
N/A
NB
Price
$2.80
Change
+$0.21 (+8.11%)
Updated
Apr 24, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
95.56M
Ad is loading...

CRML vs NB

Header iconCRML vs NB Comparison
Open Charts CRML vs NBBanner chart's image
Critical Metals
Price$1.68
Change+$0.06 (+3.73%)
Volume$11.12K
CapitalizationN/A
NioCorp Developments
Price$2.80
Change+$0.21 (+8.11%)
Volume$18.67K
Capitalization95.56M
CRML vs NB Comparison Chart
Loading...
CRML
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CRML vs. NB commentary
Apr 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRML is a StrongBuy and NB is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 25, 2025
Stock price -- (CRML: $1.61 vs. NB: $2.59)
Brand notoriety: CRML and NB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CRML: 177% vs. NB: 100%
Market capitalization -- CRML: $0 vs. NB: $95.56M
CRML [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $0. NB’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $95.56M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.15B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CRML’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNB’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CRML’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CRML is a better buy in the long-term than NB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CRML’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NB’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CRML’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • NB’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NB is a better buy in the short-term than CRML.

Price Growth

CRML (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -28.44% price change this week, while NB (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -31.66% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +1.84%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.73%.

Reported Earning Dates

CRML is expected to report earnings on Mar 19, 2025.

NB is expected to report earnings on May 29, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+1.84% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NB YTD gains are higher at: 67.097 vs. CRML (-76.289).
CRMLNBCRML / NB
CapitalizationN/A95.6M-
EBITDAN/A-35.81M-
Gain YTD-76.28967.097-114%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/A0-
Total CashN/A634K-
Total DebtN/A5.74M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NB: Fundamental Ratings
NB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
30
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
77
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
36
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CRMLNB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CRML
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MARK0.050.01
+16.26%
Remark Holdings, Inc.
CGXEF0.05N/A
+4.28%
CGX Energy Inc.
SHECF25.680.87
+3.50%
Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd.
DNTUY20.54-0.10
-0.51%
Dentsu Group Inc.
CABGY27.13-0.33
-1.20%
Carlsberg AS

CRML and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CRML and UUUU have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CRML and UUUU's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CRML
1D Price
Change %
CRML100%
-16.15%
UUUU - CRML
24%
Poorly correlated
+2.99%
ERO - CRML
24%
Poorly correlated
+5.88%
UEC - CRML
24%
Poorly correlated
+7.02%
DNN - CRML
24%
Poorly correlated
+5.43%
FURY - CRML
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.29%
More

NB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NB and MP have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NB and MP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NB
1D Price
Change %
NB100%
N/A
MP - NB
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.18%
UAMY - NB
28%
Poorly correlated
+5.52%
SGML - NB
23%
Poorly correlated
+3.00%
IONR - NB
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.85%
CRML - NB
22%
Poorly correlated
-16.15%
More