Ad is loading...
CRRFY
Price
$3.11
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
86 days until earnings call
CVPBF
Price
$2.06
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Ad is loading...

CRRFY vs CVPBF

Header iconCRRFY vs CVPBF Comparison
Open Charts CRRFY vs CVPBFBanner chart's image
Carrefour S.A
Price$3.11
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$456.04K
CapitalizationN/A
C.P. All Public
Price$2.06
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$585
CapitalizationN/A
CRRFY vs CVPBF Comparison Chart
Loading...
CRRFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CRRFY vs. CVPBF commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRRFY is a Sell and CVPBF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (CRRFY: $3.11 vs. CVPBF: $2.06)
Brand notoriety: CRRFY and CVPBF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food Retail industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CRRFY: 138% vs. CVPBF: 100%
Market capitalization -- CRRFY: $14.74B vs. CVPBF: $16.64B
CRRFY [@Food Retail] is valued at $14.74B. CVPBF’s [@Food Retail] market capitalization is $16.64B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food Retail] industry ranges from $41.13B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food Retail] industry is $11.82B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CRRFY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCVPBF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CRRFY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CVPBF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CVPBF is a better buy in the long-term than CRRFY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CRRFY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CRRFY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.

Price Growth

CRRFY (@Food Retail) experienced а -4.31% price change this week, while CVPBF (@Food Retail) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food Retail industry was -1.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.74%.

Reported Earning Dates

CRRFY is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food Retail (-1.67% weekly)

The food retail industry includes companies that sell food, beverage and household products. Items sold include grocery, gourmet food, fresh produce, and frozen food. Kroger Co., George Weston Ltd., Grocery Outlet Holding Corp., and Sprouts Farmers Markets, Inc. are examples of major food retailers. While e-commerce companies like Amazon have increasingly been ramping-up offerings in the food retail space, several traditional players have also been expanding their online presence to stand their ground against rising competition.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CVPBF($16.6B) has a higher market cap than CRRFY($14.7B). CVPBF has higher P/E ratio than CRRFY: CVPBF (43.48) vs CRRFY (10.09). CVPBF YTD gains are higher at: 18.391 vs. CRRFY (-11.981). CVPBF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 74.9B vs. CRRFY (4.76B). CVPBF has higher revenues than CRRFY: CVPBF (851B) vs CRRFY (83.1B).
CRRFYCVPBFCRRFY / CVPBF
Capitalization14.7B16.6B89%
EBITDA4.76B74.9B6%
Gain YTD-11.98118.391-65%
P/E Ratio10.0943.4823%
Revenue83.1B851B10%
Total CashN/A43.7B-
Total DebtN/A433B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CRRFY vs CVPBF: Fundamental Ratings
CRRFY
CVPBF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
6
Undervalued
35
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
87100
SMR RATING
1..100
9746
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5945
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6172
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CRRFY's Valuation (6) in the null industry is in the same range as CVPBF (35). This means that CRRFY’s stock grew similarly to CVPBF’s over the last 12 months.

CRRFY's Profit vs Risk Rating (87) in the null industry is in the same range as CVPBF (100). This means that CRRFY’s stock grew similarly to CVPBF’s over the last 12 months.

CVPBF's SMR Rating (46) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CRRFY (97). This means that CVPBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CRRFY’s over the last 12 months.

CVPBF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as CRRFY (59). This means that CVPBF’s stock grew similarly to CRRFY’s over the last 12 months.

CRRFY's P/E Growth Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as CVPBF (72). This means that CRRFY’s stock grew similarly to CVPBF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CRRFY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CRRFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
FOREX / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RUBCHF0.010.00
+1.01%
Russia Ruble - Switzerland Franc
FGIUX40.13-0.29
-0.72%
Fidelity Advisor Growth & Income C
LRSFX17.88-0.15
-0.83%
Lord Abbett Small Cap Value F
RYVFX10.98-0.12
-1.08%
Royce Small-Cap Value Service
HKDAUD0.19-0.01
-2.56%
Hong Kong Dollar - Australian Dollar

CRRFY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRRFY has been loosely correlated with JSAIY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CRRFY jumps, then JSAIY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CRRFY
1D Price
Change %
CRRFY100%
N/A
JSAIY - CRRFY
38%
Loosely correlated
+1.44%
TSCDY - CRRFY
33%
Loosely correlated
+0.84%
ADRNY - CRRFY
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.38%
CRERF - CRRFY
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DNOPY - CRRFY
25%
Poorly correlated
-3.29%
More

CVPBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CVPBF and CUYTF have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CVPBF and CUYTF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CVPBF
1D Price
Change %
CVPBF100%
N/A
CUYTF - CVPBF
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CRRFY - CVPBF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CUYTY - CVPBF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CRERF - CVPBF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ADRNY - CVPBF
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.38%
More