CRRFY
Price
$2.87
Change
-$0.10 (-3.37%)
Updated
Apr 4 closing price
Capitalization
14.74B
19 days until earnings call
LBLCF
Price
$144.32
Change
-$5.01 (-3.35%)
Updated
Apr 4 closing price
Capitalization
27.92B
Ad is loading...

CRRFY vs LBLCF

Header iconCRRFY vs LBLCF Comparison
Open Charts CRRFY vs LBLCFBanner chart's image
Carrefour S.A
Price$2.87
Change-$0.10 (-3.37%)
Volume$187.56K
Capitalization14.74B
Loblaw Companies
Price$144.32
Change-$5.01 (-3.35%)
Volume$54.99K
Capitalization27.92B
CRRFY vs LBLCF Comparison Chart
Loading...
CRRFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CRRFY vs. LBLCF commentary
Apr 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRRFY is a Buy and LBLCF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CRRFY: $2.87 vs. LBLCF: $144.32)
Brand notoriety: CRRFY and LBLCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food Retail industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CRRFY: 20% vs. LBLCF: 47%
Market capitalization -- CRRFY: $14.74B vs. LBLCF: $27.92B
CRRFY [@Food Retail] is valued at $14.74B. LBLCF’s [@Food Retail] market capitalization is $27.92B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food Retail] industry ranges from $41.13B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food Retail] industry is $12B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CRRFY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLBLCF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CRRFY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LBLCF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, LBLCF is a better buy in the long-term than CRRFY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CRRFY’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CRRFY’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

CRRFY (@Food Retail) experienced а +0.35% price change this week, while LBLCF (@Food Retail) price change was +4.91% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food Retail industry was +2.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.10%.

Reported Earning Dates

CRRFY is expected to report earnings on Apr 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food Retail (+2.27% weekly)

The food retail industry includes companies that sell food, beverage and household products. Items sold include grocery, gourmet food, fresh produce, and frozen food. Kroger Co., George Weston Ltd., Grocery Outlet Holding Corp., and Sprouts Farmers Markets, Inc. are examples of major food retailers. While e-commerce companies like Amazon have increasingly been ramping-up offerings in the food retail space, several traditional players have also been expanding their online presence to stand their ground against rising competition.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LBLCF($27.9B) has a higher market cap than CRRFY($14.7B). LBLCF has higher P/E ratio than CRRFY: LBLCF (18.80) vs CRRFY (10.09). LBLCF YTD gains are higher at: 9.841 vs. CRRFY (3.237). LBLCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.46B vs. CRRFY (4.76B). CRRFY has higher revenues than LBLCF: CRRFY (83.1B) vs LBLCF (58.1B).
CRRFYLBLCFCRRFY / LBLCF
Capitalization14.7B27.9B53%
EBITDA4.76B6.46B74%
Gain YTD3.2379.84133%
P/E Ratio10.0918.8054%
Revenue83.1B58.1B143%
Total CashN/A1.74B-
Total DebtN/A18B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CRRFY vs LBLCF: Fundamental Ratings
CRRFY
LBLCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
331
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
9
Undervalued
90
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
842
SMR RATING
1..100
9946
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5140
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3916
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CRRFY's Valuation (9) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LBLCF (90). This means that CRRFY’s stock grew significantly faster than LBLCF’s over the last 12 months.

LBLCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CRRFY (84). This means that LBLCF’s stock grew significantly faster than CRRFY’s over the last 12 months.

LBLCF's SMR Rating (46) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CRRFY (99). This means that LBLCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CRRFY’s over the last 12 months.

LBLCF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as CRRFY (51). This means that LBLCF’s stock grew similarly to CRRFY’s over the last 12 months.

LBLCF's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the null industry is in the same range as CRRFY (39). This means that LBLCF’s stock grew similarly to CRRFY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CRRFY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CRRFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SFPAX9.80N/A
N/A
Saratoga Financial Service A
MNVAX27.78N/A
N/A
Madison Large Cap A
RGIVX13.68N/A
N/A
ClearBridge Global Infrastructure Inc I
BMSTX13.00N/A
N/A
MFS Blended Research Mid Cap Eq R3
FIQAX15.18N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 60% Z

CRRFY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRRFY has been loosely correlated with JSAIY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CRRFY jumps, then JSAIY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CRRFY
1D Price
Change %
CRRFY100%
-3.37%
JSAIY - CRRFY
38%
Loosely correlated
-3.17%
TSCDY - CRRFY
33%
Loosely correlated
-2.55%
ADRNY - CRRFY
30%
Poorly correlated
-2.49%
CRERF - CRRFY
29%
Poorly correlated
+5.45%
DNOPY - CRRFY
25%
Poorly correlated
-3.23%
More

LBLCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LBLCF and WNGRF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LBLCF and WNGRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LBLCF
1D Price
Change %
LBLCF100%
-3.35%
WNGRF - LBLCF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CRRFY - LBLCF
20%
Poorly correlated
-3.37%
MSS - LBLCF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.94%
MTRAF - LBLCF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.93%
JSAIY - LBLCF
15%
Poorly correlated
-3.17%
More