CRRTF vs LIFD
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRRTF is a Hold and LIFD is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CRRTF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLIFD’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CRRTF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- LIFD’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CRRTF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LIFD’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CRRTF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
- LIFD’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
CRRTF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while LIFD (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was +0.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.09%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Pharmaceuticals: Other (+0.61% weekly)Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.
| CRRTF | LIFD | CRRTF / LIFD | |
| Capitalization | 6.47M | 34.4M | 19% |
| EBITDA | 61K | 6.09M | 1% |
| Gain YTD | 60.357 | -78.972 | -76% |
| P/E Ratio | 4.48 | 8.65 | 52% |
| Revenue | 17.5M | 51.8M | 34% |
| Total Cash | 9.39M | 3.66M | 257% |
| Total Debt | 1.25M | 2.02M | 62% |
CRRTF | LIFD | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 35 | 62 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 64 Fair valued | 61 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 93 | 90 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 34 | 91 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 92 | 42 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 19 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LIFD's Valuation (61) in the null industry is in the same range as CRRTF (64). This means that LIFD’s stock grew similarly to CRRTF’s over the last 12 months.
LIFD's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CRRTF (100). This means that LIFD’s stock grew similarly to CRRTF’s over the last 12 months.
LIFD's SMR Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as CRRTF (93). This means that LIFD’s stock grew similarly to CRRTF’s over the last 12 months.
CRRTF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LIFD (91). This means that CRRTF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LIFD’s over the last 12 months.
LIFD's P/E Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CRRTF (92). This means that LIFD’s stock grew somewhat faster than CRRTF’s over the last 12 months.
| CRRTF | LIFD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 64% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 35% | 2 days ago 68% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 33% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 37% | 2 days ago 90% |
CRRTF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CRRTF and LIFD have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CRRTF and LIFD's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CRRTF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRRTF | 100% | N/A | ||
| LIFD - CRRTF | 29% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SIGA - CRRTF | 26% Poorly correlated | -1.46% | ||
| SHWZ - CRRTF | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CWBHF - CRRTF | 4% Poorly correlated | -7.86% | ||
| CTTH - CRRTF | 2% Poorly correlated | +0.04% | ||
More | ||||
LIFD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LIFD has been loosely correlated with LVZPF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LIFD jumps, then LVZPF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LIFD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIFD | 100% | N/A | ||
| LVZPF - LIFD | 34% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| CRRTF - LIFD | 29% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| BFRI - LIFD | 6% Poorly correlated | -4.40% | ||
| HLN - LIFD | 5% Poorly correlated | +1.95% | ||
| SHPH - LIFD | 3% Poorly correlated | -9.54% | ||
More | ||||