CRWOF
Price
$0.53
Change
+$0.02 (+3.92%)
Updated
Jul 16 closing price
Capitalization
18.92B
ESOA
Price
$10.61
Change
+$0.65 (+6.53%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
177.38M
23 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CRWOF vs ESOA

Header iconCRWOF vs ESOA Comparison
Open Charts CRWOF vs ESOABanner chart's image
China Railway Group
Price$0.53
Change+$0.02 (+3.92%)
Volume$19K
Capitalization18.92B
Energy Services of America
Price$10.61
Change+$0.65 (+6.53%)
Volume$133.11K
Capitalization177.38M
CRWOF vs ESOA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CRWOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ESOA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CRWOF vs. ESOA commentary
Jul 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRWOF is a Buy and ESOA is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 26, 2025
Stock price -- (CRWOF: $0.53 vs. ESOA: $10.61)
Brand notoriety: CRWOF and ESOA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Engineering & Construction industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CRWOF: 64% vs. ESOA: 58%
Market capitalization -- CRWOF: $18.92B vs. ESOA: $177.38M
CRWOF [@Engineering & Construction] is valued at $18.92B. ESOA’s [@Engineering & Construction] market capitalization is $177.38M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Engineering & Construction] industry ranges from $14.67T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Engineering & Construction] industry is $7.55B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CRWOF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileESOA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CRWOF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • ESOA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ESOA is a better buy in the long-term than CRWOF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CRWOF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ESOA’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CRWOF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • ESOA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CRWOF and ESOA are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CRWOF (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while ESOA (@Engineering & Construction) price change was +8.93% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was +4.66%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was +509.97%.

Reported Earning Dates

ESOA is expected to report earnings on Dec 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Engineering & Construction (+4.66% weekly)

Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CRWOF($18.9B) has a higher market cap than ESOA($177M). ESOA has higher P/E ratio than CRWOF: ESOA (9.73) vs CRWOF (3.62). CRWOF YTD gains are higher at: 5.240 vs. ESOA (-15.413). CRWOF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 31.8B vs. ESOA (37M). ESOA has less debt than CRWOF: ESOA (53.2M) vs CRWOF (554B). CRWOF has higher revenues than ESOA: CRWOF (1.14T) vs ESOA (368M).
CRWOFESOACRWOF / ESOA
Capitalization18.9B177M10,678%
EBITDA31.8B37M85,946%
Gain YTD5.240-15.413-34%
P/E Ratio3.629.7337%
Revenue1.14T368M310,870%
Total Cash185BN/A-
Total Debt554B53.2M1,041,353%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CRWOF vs ESOA: Fundamental Ratings
CRWOF
ESOA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
406
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
12
Undervalued
35
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9845
SMR RATING
1..100
7623
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4751
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2980
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CRWOF's Valuation (12) in the null industry is in the same range as ESOA (35). This means that CRWOF’s stock grew similarly to ESOA’s over the last 12 months.

ESOA's Profit vs Risk Rating (45) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CRWOF (98). This means that ESOA’s stock grew somewhat faster than CRWOF’s over the last 12 months.

ESOA's SMR Rating (23) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CRWOF (76). This means that ESOA’s stock grew somewhat faster than CRWOF’s over the last 12 months.

CRWOF's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as ESOA (51). This means that CRWOF’s stock grew similarly to ESOA’s over the last 12 months.

CRWOF's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ESOA (80). This means that CRWOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ESOA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CRWOFESOA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CRWOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ESOA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GFT.X0.0228800.005212
+29.50%
Gifto cryptocurrency
PENDLE.X4.4826870.210658
+4.93%
Pendle cryptocurrency
SSV.X9.8233710.237662
+2.48%
ssv.network cryptocurrency
BSW.X0.0180990.000048
+0.27%
Biswap cryptocurrency
TMDV47.79N/A
N/A
ProShares Russell US Dividend Grwr ETF

CRWOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CRWOF and OBSJF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CRWOF and OBSJF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CRWOF
1D Price
Change %
CRWOF100%
N/A
OBSJF - CRWOF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JGCCY - CRWOF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PWR - CRWOF
4%
Poorly correlated
+3.55%
ESOA - CRWOF
2%
Poorly correlated
+6.53%
EFGSY - CRWOF
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.75%
More

ESOA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ESOA has been loosely correlated with MTZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ESOA jumps, then MTZ could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ESOA
1D Price
Change %
ESOA100%
+6.53%
MTZ - ESOA
49%
Loosely correlated
+2.44%
STRL - ESOA
46%
Loosely correlated
+6.12%
PWR - ESOA
45%
Loosely correlated
+3.55%
EME - ESOA
44%
Loosely correlated
+9.72%
FIX - ESOA
43%
Loosely correlated
+22.37%
More