CRWOF
Price
$0.49
Change
+$0.04 (+8.89%)
Updated
Sep 9 closing price
Capitalization
17.82B
JGCCY
Price
$20.20
Change
+$1.29 (+6.82%)
Updated
Sep 12 closing price
Capitalization
2.5B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CRWOF vs JGCCY

Header iconCRWOF vs JGCCY Comparison
Open Charts CRWOF vs JGCCYBanner chart's image
China Railway Group
Price$0.49
Change+$0.04 (+8.89%)
Volume$4.07K
Capitalization17.82B
JGC Holdings
Price$20.20
Change+$1.29 (+6.82%)
Volume$350
Capitalization2.5B
CRWOF vs JGCCY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CRWOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
JGCCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CRWOF vs. JGCCY commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRWOF is a Hold and JGCCY is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (CRWOF: $0.49 vs. JGCCY: $20.20)
Brand notoriety: CRWOF and JGCCY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Engineering & Construction industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CRWOF: 120% vs. JGCCY: 75%
Market capitalization -- CRWOF: $17.82B vs. JGCCY: $2.5B
CRWOF [@Engineering & Construction] is valued at $17.82B. JGCCY’s [@Engineering & Construction] market capitalization is $2.5B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Engineering & Construction] industry ranges from $14.67T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Engineering & Construction] industry is $7.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CRWOF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileJGCCY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CRWOF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • JGCCY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, JGCCY is a better buy in the long-term than CRWOF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CRWOF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while JGCCY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CRWOF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • JGCCY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, JGCCY is a better buy in the short-term than CRWOF.

Price Growth

CRWOF (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while JGCCY (@Engineering & Construction) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was +0.94%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was +335.89%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Engineering & Construction (+0.94% weekly)

Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CRWOF($17.8B) has a higher market cap than JGCCY($2.5B). JGCCY has higher P/E ratio than CRWOF: JGCCY (18.46) vs CRWOF (3.62). JGCCY YTD gains are higher at: 31.457 vs. CRWOF (-2.000). CRWOF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 47.6B vs. JGCCY (8.5B). JGCCY has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. CRWOF (205B). JGCCY has less debt than CRWOF: JGCCY (34.7B) vs CRWOF (573B). CRWOF has higher revenues than JGCCY: CRWOF (1.13T) vs JGCCY (836B).
CRWOFJGCCYCRWOF / JGCCY
Capitalization17.8B2.5B712%
EBITDA47.6B8.5B560%
Gain YTD-2.00031.457-6%
P/E Ratio3.6218.4620%
Revenue1.13T836B135%
Total Cash205B357B57%
Total Debt573B34.7B1,651%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CRWOF vs JGCCY: Fundamental Ratings
CRWOF
JGCCY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3138
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
14
Undervalued
55
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
774
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5943
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1520
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7575

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CRWOF's Valuation (14) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for JGCCY (55). This means that CRWOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than JGCCY’s over the last 12 months.

CRWOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as JGCCY (100). This means that CRWOF’s stock grew similarly to JGCCY’s over the last 12 months.

JGCCY's SMR Rating (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CRWOF (77). This means that JGCCY’s stock grew significantly faster than CRWOF’s over the last 12 months.

JGCCY's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as CRWOF (59). This means that JGCCY’s stock grew similarly to CRWOF’s over the last 12 months.

CRWOF's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the null industry is in the same range as JGCCY (20). This means that CRWOF’s stock grew similarly to JGCCY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CRWOFJGCCY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
55%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
89%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CRWOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
JGCCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EUSM26.73N/A
N/A
Eventide U.S. Market ETF
HMOP39.00-0.02
-0.05%
Hartford Municipal Opportunities ETF
BINC53.21-0.06
-0.11%
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF
BTA9.66-0.13
-1.33%
Blackrock Long-Term Municipal Advantage Trust
NRSH22.76-0.80
-3.39%
Aztlan NA Nearshoring Stk Sel ETF

CRWOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CRWOF and OBSJF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CRWOF and OBSJF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CRWOF
1D Price
Change %
CRWOF100%
N/A
OBSJF - CRWOF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JGCCY - CRWOF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PWR - CRWOF
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.61%
ESOA - CRWOF
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.70%
EFGSY - CRWOF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

JGCCY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that JGCCY and JGCCF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that JGCCY and JGCCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JGCCY
1D Price
Change %
JGCCY100%
N/A
JGCCF - JGCCY
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KLRGF - JGCCY
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DY - JGCCY
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.63%
AEGXF - JGCCY
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.05%
SLND - JGCCY
20%
Poorly correlated
-6.84%
More