CRWOF
Price
$0.44
Change
-$0.03 (-6.38%)
Updated
Jun 30 closing price
Capitalization
18.32B
PWR
Price
$386.51
Change
+$13.10 (+3.51%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
57.28B
26 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CRWOF vs PWR

Header iconCRWOF vs PWR Comparison
Open Charts CRWOF vs PWRBanner chart's image
China Railway Group
Price$0.44
Change-$0.03 (-6.38%)
Volume$357
Capitalization18.32B
Quanta Services
Price$386.51
Change+$13.10 (+3.51%)
Volume$869.63K
Capitalization57.28B
CRWOF vs PWR Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CRWOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PWR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CRWOF vs. PWR commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRWOF is a Hold and PWR is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CRWOF: $0.44 vs. PWR: $386.51)
Brand notoriety: CRWOF and PWR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Engineering & Construction industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CRWOF: 1% vs. PWR: 74%
Market capitalization -- CRWOF: $18.32B vs. PWR: $57.28B
CRWOF [@Engineering & Construction] is valued at $18.32B. PWR’s [@Engineering & Construction] market capitalization is $57.28B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Engineering & Construction] industry ranges from $14.67T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Engineering & Construction] industry is $7.25B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CRWOF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePWR’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CRWOF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PWR’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, PWR is a better buy in the long-term than CRWOF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CRWOF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PWR’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CRWOF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PWR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PWR is a better buy in the short-term than CRWOF.

Price Growth

CRWOF (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а -7.33% price change this week, while PWR (@Engineering & Construction) price change was +1.88% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was +1.84%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +30.10%, and the average quarterly price growth was +155.25%.

Reported Earning Dates

PWR is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Engineering & Construction (+1.84% weekly)

Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PWR($57.3B) has a higher market cap than CRWOF($18.3B). PWR has higher P/E ratio than CRWOF: PWR (62.34) vs CRWOF (3.03). PWR YTD gains are higher at: 22.411 vs. CRWOF (-11.960). CRWOF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 31.8B vs. PWR (2.25B). PWR has less debt than CRWOF: PWR (4.75B) vs CRWOF (554B). CRWOF has higher revenues than PWR: CRWOF (1.14T) vs PWR (24.9B).
CRWOFPWRCRWOF / PWR
Capitalization18.3B57.3B32%
EBITDA31.8B2.25B1,411%
Gain YTD-11.96022.411-53%
P/E Ratio3.0362.345%
Revenue1.14T24.9B4,594%
Total Cash185BN/A-
Total Debt554B4.75B11,668%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CRWOF vs PWR: Fundamental Ratings
CRWOF
PWR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5042
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
9
Undervalued
92
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1009
SMR RATING
1..100
7657
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
615
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6228
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CRWOF's Valuation (9) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PWR (92) in the Engineering And Construction industry. This means that CRWOF’s stock grew significantly faster than PWR’s over the last 12 months.

PWR's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the Engineering And Construction industry is significantly better than the same rating for CRWOF (100) in the null industry. This means that PWR’s stock grew significantly faster than CRWOF’s over the last 12 months.

PWR's SMR Rating (57) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as CRWOF (76) in the null industry. This means that PWR’s stock grew similarly to CRWOF’s over the last 12 months.

PWR's Price Growth Rating (5) in the Engineering And Construction industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CRWOF (61) in the null industry. This means that PWR’s stock grew somewhat faster than CRWOF’s over the last 12 months.

PWR's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the Engineering And Construction industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CRWOF (62) in the null industry. This means that PWR’s stock grew somewhat faster than CRWOF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CRWOFPWR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CRWOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PWR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EPX.X0.000006N/A
+1.31%
Ellipsis cryptocurrency
STEEM.X0.1273100.000089
+0.07%
Steem cryptocurrency
ROSE.X0.0235600.000007
+0.03%
Oasis cryptocurrency
GHST.X0.361423-0.003285
-0.90%
Aavegotchi cryptocurrency
FET.X0.662141-0.012590
-1.87%
Artificial Superintelligence Alliance cryptocurrency

CRWOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CRWOF and OBSJF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CRWOF and OBSJF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CRWOF
1D Price
Change %
CRWOF100%
N/A
OBSJF - CRWOF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JGCCY - CRWOF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PWR - CRWOF
4%
Poorly correlated
+3.51%
ESOA - CRWOF
2%
Poorly correlated
+5.13%
EFGSY - CRWOF
1%
Poorly correlated
-1.18%
More

PWR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PWR has been closely correlated with MTZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PWR jumps, then MTZ could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PWR
1D Price
Change %
PWR100%
+3.51%
MTZ - PWR
84%
Closely correlated
+1.49%
PRIM - PWR
82%
Closely correlated
+3.30%
EME - PWR
82%
Closely correlated
+1.00%
STRL - PWR
79%
Closely correlated
+3.48%
MYRG - PWR
66%
Loosely correlated
+3.06%
More