It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CRWS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileKEQU’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CRWS’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KEQU’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
CRWS (@Home Furnishings) experienced а +6.64% price change this week, while KEQU (@Home Furnishings) price change was +3.02% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Home Furnishings industry was +6.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was -17.74%.
CRWS is expected to report earnings on Jun 12, 2025.
KEQU is expected to report earnings on Jun 25, 2025.
The home furnishings industry includes companies that sell items like furniture, appliances, rugs, cooking utensils, and art objects. According to Mordor Intelligence, the U.S. home decor market is estimated to grow at CAGR 7.5% between 2019 and 2024. The market is being increasingly penetrated by e-commerce and m-commerce, while growing urbanization, and, consumers’ rising interest towards home decor are driving demand for the industry. Mohawk Industries, Inc., La-Z-Boy Incorporated, Leggett & Platt, Incorporated are some of the prominent companies in this space. Being usually discretionary for consumers, demand for furnishings could be affected by macroeconomic cycles.
CRWS | KEQU | CRWS / KEQU | |
Capitalization | 54.6M | 100M | 55% |
EBITDA | 11.9M | 18.9M | 63% |
Gain YTD | -32.688 | -47.066 | 69% |
P/E Ratio | 11.59 | 11.69 | 99% |
Revenue | 86.7M | 201M | 43% |
Total Cash | 683K | 21.3M | 3% |
Total Debt | 26.6M | 11.3M | 235% |
CRWS | KEQU | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 4 | 5 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 50 Fair valued | 50 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 49 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 83 | 29 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 89 | 64 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 30 | 95 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CRWS's Valuation (50) in the Home Furnishings industry is in the same range as KEQU (50) in the Office Equipment Or Supplies industry. This means that CRWS’s stock grew similarly to KEQU’s over the last 12 months.
KEQU's Profit vs Risk Rating (49) in the Office Equipment Or Supplies industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CRWS (100) in the Home Furnishings industry. This means that KEQU’s stock grew somewhat faster than CRWS’s over the last 12 months.
KEQU's SMR Rating (29) in the Office Equipment Or Supplies industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CRWS (83) in the Home Furnishings industry. This means that KEQU’s stock grew somewhat faster than CRWS’s over the last 12 months.
KEQU's Price Growth Rating (64) in the Office Equipment Or Supplies industry is in the same range as CRWS (89) in the Home Furnishings industry. This means that KEQU’s stock grew similarly to CRWS’s over the last 12 months.
CRWS's P/E Growth Rating (30) in the Home Furnishings industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KEQU (95) in the Office Equipment Or Supplies industry. This means that CRWS’s stock grew somewhat faster than KEQU’s over the last 12 months.
CRWS | KEQU | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago48% | 4 days ago86% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago52% | 4 days ago63% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago47% | 6 days ago55% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago46% | 4 days ago54% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago50% | 4 days ago65% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago50% | 4 days ago51% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago50% | 4 days ago64% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago53% | 8 days ago58% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago56% | 4 days ago61% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago44% | 4 days ago55% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that CRWS and MBC have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CRWS and MBC's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CRWS | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CRWS | 100% | -2.95% | ||
MBC - CRWS | 30% Poorly correlated | +0.25% | ||
MHK - CRWS | 29% Poorly correlated | -0.09% | ||
SN - CRWS | 29% Poorly correlated | +0.40% | ||
NTZ - CRWS | 28% Poorly correlated | +2.77% | ||
SGI - CRWS | 26% Poorly correlated | +0.35% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that KEQU and ATER have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KEQU and ATER's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KEQU | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
KEQU | 100% | -4.93% | ||
ATER - KEQU | 25% Poorly correlated | +0.52% | ||
CRWS - KEQU | 23% Poorly correlated | -2.95% | ||
BSET - KEQU | 22% Poorly correlated | -1.35% | ||
LCUT - KEQU | 22% Poorly correlated | -4.74% | ||
MLKN - KEQU | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.24% | ||
More |