CRWS
Price
$2.74
Change
-$0.02 (-0.72%)
Updated
Jun 22 closing price
Capitalization
29.53M
One day until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NTZ
Price
$1.91
Change
-$0.21 (-9.91%)
Updated
Jun 22 closing price
Capitalization
21.04M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CRWS vs NTZ

CRWS vs NTZ Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CRWS vs. NTZ commentary
Jun 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRWS is a Hold and NTZ is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 23, 2026
Stock price -- (CRWS: $2.76 vs. NTZ: $1.91)
Brand notoriety: CRWS and NTZ are both not notable
Both companies represent the Home Furnishings industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CRWS: 144% vs. NTZ: 29%
Market capitalization -- CRWS: $29.53M vs. NTZ: $21.04M
CRWS [@Home Furnishings] is valued at $29.53M. NTZ’s [@Home Furnishings] market capitalization is $21.04M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Home Furnishings] industry ranges from $27.62B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Home Furnishings] industry is $1.93B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CRWS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNTZ’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CRWS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NTZ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CRWS is a better buy in the long-term than NTZ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CRWS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NTZ’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CRWS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NTZ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NTZ is a better buy in the short-term than CRWS.

Price Growth

CRWS (@Home Furnishings) experienced а +1.47% price change this week, while NTZ (@Home Furnishings) price change was -9.05% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Home Furnishings industry was +0.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

CRWS is expected to report earnings on Jun 24, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Home Furnishings (+0.53% weekly)

The home furnishings industry includes companies that sell items like furniture, appliances, rugs, cooking utensils, and art objects. According to Mordor Intelligence, the U.S. home decor market is estimated to grow at CAGR 7.5% between 2019 and 2024. The market is being increasingly penetrated by e-commerce and m-commerce, while growing urbanization, and, consumers’ rising interest towards home decor are driving demand for the industry. Mohawk Industries, Inc., La-Z-Boy Incorporated, Leggett & Platt, Incorporated are some of the prominent companies in this space. Being usually discretionary for consumers, demand for furnishings could be affected by macroeconomic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CRWS($29.5M) has a higher market cap than NTZ($21M). CRWS YTD gains are higher at: 5.446 vs. NTZ (-19.072). CRWS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.43M vs. NTZ (-12.76M). NTZ has higher revenues than CRWS: NTZ (328M) vs CRWS (83.1M).
CRWSNTZCRWS / NTZ
Capitalization29.5M21M140%
EBITDA6.43M-12.76M-50%
Gain YTD5.446-19.072-29%
P/E Ratio11.83N/A-
Revenue83.1M328M25%
Total Cash1.59MN/A-
Total Debt26.5MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CRWS vs NTZ: Fundamental Ratings
CRWS
NTZ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
404
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
3
Undervalued
34
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9798
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5081
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4299
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5090

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CRWS's Valuation (3) in the Home Furnishings industry is in the same range as NTZ (34). This means that CRWS’s stock grew similarly to NTZ’s over the last 12 months.

CRWS's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Home Furnishings industry is in the same range as NTZ (100). This means that CRWS’s stock grew similarly to NTZ’s over the last 12 months.

CRWS's SMR Rating (97) in the Home Furnishings industry is in the same range as NTZ (98). This means that CRWS’s stock grew similarly to NTZ’s over the last 12 months.

CRWS's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Home Furnishings industry is in the same range as NTZ (81). This means that CRWS’s stock grew similarly to NTZ’s over the last 12 months.

CRWS's P/E Growth Rating (42) in the Home Furnishings industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NTZ (99). This means that CRWS’s stock grew somewhat faster than NTZ’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CRWSNTZ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CRWS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NTZ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VLO243.787.48
+3.17%
Valero Energy Corp
HTLD14.690.25
+1.73%
Heartland Express
NGEN2.15-0.05
-2.27%
NervGen Pharma Corp.
LGND262.10-12.79
-4.65%
Ligand Pharmaceuticals
LICN1.22-0.95
-43.78%
Lichen International Limited

CRWS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CRWS and NTZ have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CRWS and NTZ's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CRWS
1D Price
Change %
CRWS100%
N/A
NTZ - CRWS
28%
Poorly correlated
-9.91%
MLKN - CRWS
28%
Poorly correlated
-4.45%
MBC - CRWS
24%
Poorly correlated
-4.86%
HNI - CRWS
24%
Poorly correlated
-2.01%
ATER - CRWS
23%
Poorly correlated
-4.35%
More

NTZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NTZ and CRWS have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NTZ and CRWS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NTZ
1D Price
Change %
NTZ100%
-9.91%
CRWS - NTZ
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
COOK - NTZ
10%
Poorly correlated
-6.63%
MLKN - NTZ
9%
Poorly correlated
-4.45%
HNI - NTZ
8%
Poorly correlated
-2.01%
FGI - NTZ
3%
Poorly correlated
-1.71%
More