CRZBY
Price
$37.47
Change
-$2.57 (-6.42%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
42.84B
69 days until earnings call
UNCFF
Price
$77.34
Change
-$1.75 (-2.21%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
118.6B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CRZBY vs UNCFF

Header iconCRZBY vs UNCFF Comparison
Open Charts CRZBY vs UNCFFBanner chart's image
Commerzbank AG
Price$37.47
Change-$2.57 (-6.42%)
Volume$101.83K
Capitalization42.84B
UniCredito Spa
Price$77.34
Change-$1.75 (-2.21%)
Volume$1.18K
Capitalization118.6B
CRZBY vs UNCFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CRZBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UNCFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CRZBY vs. UNCFF commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRZBY is a Hold and UNCFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (CRZBY: $37.76 vs. UNCFF: $77.34)
Brand notoriety: CRZBY and UNCFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CRZBY: 191% vs. UNCFF: 42%
Market capitalization -- CRZBY: $42.84B vs. UNCFF: $118.6B
CRZBY [@Regional Banks] is valued at $42.84B. UNCFF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $118.6B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.85B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CRZBY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUNCFF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CRZBY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • UNCFF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, UNCFF is a better buy in the long-term than CRZBY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CRZBY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UNCFF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CRZBY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • UNCFF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, UNCFF is a better buy in the short-term than CRZBY.

Price Growth

CRZBY (@Regional Banks) experienced а -13.85% price change this week, while UNCFF (@Regional Banks) price change was -3.91% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.81%.

Reported Earning Dates

CRZBY is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.27% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UNCFF($119B) has a higher market cap than CRZBY($42.8B). CRZBY has higher P/E ratio than UNCFF: CRZBY (15.52) vs UNCFF (10.02). CRZBY YTD gains are higher at: 139.427 vs. UNCFF (93.274). CRZBY has less debt than UNCFF: CRZBY (75.8B) vs UNCFF (128B). UNCFF has higher revenues than CRZBY: UNCFF (26.7B) vs CRZBY (12.8B).
CRZBYUNCFFCRZBY / UNCFF
Capitalization42.8B119B36%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD139.42793.274149%
P/E Ratio15.5210.02155%
Revenue12.8B26.7B48%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt75.8B128B59%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CRZBY vs UNCFF: Fundamental Ratings
CRZBY
UNCFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7487
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
81
Overvalued
70
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
34
SMR RATING
1..100
1004
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3739
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10013
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

UNCFF's Valuation (70) in the null industry is in the same range as CRZBY (81). This means that UNCFF’s stock grew similarly to CRZBY’s over the last 12 months.

CRZBY's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the null industry is in the same range as UNCFF (4). This means that CRZBY’s stock grew similarly to UNCFF’s over the last 12 months.

UNCFF's SMR Rating (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CRZBY (100). This means that UNCFF’s stock grew significantly faster than CRZBY’s over the last 12 months.

CRZBY's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as UNCFF (39). This means that CRZBY’s stock grew similarly to UNCFF’s over the last 12 months.

UNCFF's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CRZBY (100). This means that UNCFF’s stock grew significantly faster than CRZBY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CRZBYUNCFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CRZBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UNCFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BYFC7.990.21
+2.70%
Broadway Financial Corp
LXRX1.150.02
+1.77%
Lexicon Pharmaceuticals
GVH4.610.07
+1.43%
Globavend Holdings Limited
RVTY89.230.64
+0.72%
Revvity
HUN10.89-0.10
-0.91%
Huntsman Corp

UNCFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UNCFF has been loosely correlated with ISNPY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UNCFF jumps, then ISNPY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UNCFF
1D Price
Change %
UNCFF100%
-2.21%
ISNPY - UNCFF
49%
Loosely correlated
-2.94%
CRZBY - UNCFF
39%
Loosely correlated
-6.42%
BKRIY - UNCFF
33%
Loosely correlated
-2.00%
MDIBY - UNCFF
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.53%
KBCSY - UNCFF
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.54%
More