CSASF
Price
$19.89
Change
+$4.09 (+25.89%)
Updated
May 15 closing price
Capitalization
3.78B
FDCHF
Price
$1.53
Change
-$0.04 (-2.55%)
Updated
Jun 4 closing price
Capitalization
581.97M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CSASF vs FDCHF

Header iconCSASF vs FDCHF Comparison
Open Charts CSASF vs FDCHFBanner chart's image
Credit Saison
Price$19.89
Change+$4.09 (+25.89%)
Volume$100
Capitalization3.78B
Funding Circle
Price$1.53
Change-$0.04 (-2.55%)
Volume$23.08K
Capitalization581.97M
CSASF vs FDCHF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FDCHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CSASF vs. FDCHF commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSASF is a Hold and FDCHF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (CSASF: $19.89 vs. FDCHF: $1.53)
Brand notoriety: CSASF and FDCHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Savings Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CSASF: 100% vs. FDCHF: 100%
Market capitalization -- CSASF: $3.78B vs. FDCHF: $581.97M
CSASF [@Savings Banks] is valued at $3.78B. FDCHF’s [@Savings Banks] market capitalization is $581.97M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Savings Banks] industry ranges from $679.06B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Savings Banks] industry is $22.21B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CSASF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFDCHF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CSASF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FDCHF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CSASF is a better buy in the long-term than FDCHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FDCHF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FDCHF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.

Price Growth

CSASF (@Savings Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while FDCHF (@Savings Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was +4.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.56%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Savings Banks (+4.30% weekly)

A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSASF($3.78B) has a higher market cap than FDCHF($582M). FDCHF has higher P/E ratio than CSASF: FDCHF (1135.22) vs CSASF (6.55). CSASF YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. FDCHF (-2.548).
CSASFFDCHFCSASF / FDCHF
Capitalization3.78B582M649%
EBITDA145BN/A-
Gain YTD0.000-2.548-
P/E Ratio6.551135.221%
Revenue438BN/A-
Total Cash99.4BN/A-
Total Debt3.25TN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CSASF vs FDCHF: Fundamental Ratings
CSASF
FDCHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4149
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
17
Undervalued
99
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
185
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7151
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
30n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CSASF's Valuation (17) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FDCHF (99). This means that CSASF’s stock grew significantly faster than FDCHF’s over the last 12 months.

CSASF's Profit vs Risk Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FDCHF (85). This means that CSASF’s stock grew significantly faster than FDCHF’s over the last 12 months.

CSASF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as FDCHF (100). This means that CSASF’s stock grew similarly to FDCHF’s over the last 12 months.

FDCHF's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as CSASF (71). This means that FDCHF’s stock grew similarly to CSASF’s over the last 12 months.

FDCHF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CSASF (100). This means that FDCHF’s stock grew similarly to CSASF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CSASFFDCHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
9%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
27%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
9%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
28%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FDCHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JCPRX23.60N/A
N/A
JPMorgan US Large Cap Core Plus R5
TCEPX45.33N/A
N/A
Nuveen Equity Index Premier
CIOIX19.37N/A
N/A
Causeway International Opps Inst
VVERX7.46N/A
N/A
Virtus Ceredex Small-Cap Value Eq R6
SPMGX8.23N/A
N/A
Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha R

CSASF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CSASF has been loosely correlated with FDCHF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CSASF jumps, then FDCHF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSASF
1D Price
Change %
CSASF100%
N/A
FDCHF - CSASF
50%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ELEEF - CSASF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.23%
PMTS - CSASF
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.42%
BCVVF - CSASF
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ASHTY - CSASF
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.40%
More

FDCHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDCHF has been loosely correlated with CSASF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FDCHF jumps, then CSASF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FDCHF
1D Price
Change %
FDCHF100%
N/A
CSASF - FDCHF
50%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BCVVF - FDCHF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LZRFY - FDCHF
6%
Poorly correlated
+2.79%
KGTHY - FDCHF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HYPOF - FDCHF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More