CSASF
Price
$19.89
Change
+$4.09 (+25.89%)
Updated
May 15 closing price
Capitalization
2.52B
PMTS
Price
$24.11
Change
-$2.43 (-9.16%)
Updated
Apr 4 closing price
Capitalization
197.69M
38 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CSASF vs PMTS

Header iconCSASF vs PMTS Comparison
Open Charts CSASF vs PMTSBanner chart's image
Credit Saison
Price$19.89
Change+$4.09 (+25.89%)
Volume$100
Capitalization2.52B
CPI Card Group
Price$24.11
Change-$2.43 (-9.16%)
Volume$48.16K
Capitalization197.69M
CSASF vs PMTS Comparison Chart
Loading...
PMTS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CSASF vs. PMTS commentary
Apr 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSASF is a Hold and PMTS is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CSASF: $19.89 vs. PMTS: $24.10)
Brand notoriety: CSASF and PMTS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CSASF: 100% vs. PMTS: 146%
Market capitalization -- CSASF: $2.52B vs. PMTS: $197.69M
CSASF [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $2.52B. PMTS’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $197.69M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $12.66B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CSASF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePMTS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CSASF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PMTS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CSASF is a better buy in the long-term than PMTS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PMTS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • PMTS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

CSASF (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PMTS (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was -16.30% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was -8.59%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.55%, and the average quarterly price growth was +35.42%.

Reported Earning Dates

PMTS is expected to report earnings on May 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (-8.59% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSASF($2.52B) has a higher market cap than PMTS($198M). PMTS has higher P/E ratio than CSASF: PMTS (8.63) vs CSASF (6.34). CSASF YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. PMTS (-19.354). CSASF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 108B vs. PMTS (77.3M). CSASF has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. PMTS (12.4M). PMTS has less debt than CSASF: PMTS (272M) vs CSASF (2.81T). CSASF has higher revenues than PMTS: CSASF (383B) vs PMTS (445M).
CSASFPMTSCSASF / PMTS
Capitalization2.52B198M1,273%
EBITDA108B77.3M139,715%
Gain YTD0.000-19.354-
P/E Ratio6.348.6373%
Revenue383B445M86,067%
Total Cash160B12.4M1,290,323%
Total Debt2.81T272M1,034,191%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CSASF vs PMTS: Fundamental Ratings
CSASF
PMTS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3974
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
58
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3543
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4660
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3211
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CSASF's Valuation (28) in the null industry is in the same range as PMTS (58) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that CSASF’s stock grew similarly to PMTS’s over the last 12 months.

CSASF's Profit vs Risk Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as PMTS (43) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that CSASF’s stock grew similarly to PMTS’s over the last 12 months.

CSASF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as PMTS (100) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that CSASF’s stock grew similarly to PMTS’s over the last 12 months.

CSASF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as PMTS (60) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that CSASF’s stock grew similarly to PMTS’s over the last 12 months.

PMTS's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the Data Processing Services industry is in the same range as CSASF (32) in the null industry. This means that PMTS’s stock grew similarly to CSASF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PMTS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
PMTS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FICVX32.250.25
+0.78%
Fidelity Advisor Convertible Secs I
CDGRX11.36N/A
N/A
Copeland Dividend Growth Fund Class A
BAFWX47.57N/A
N/A
Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth I
RWCEX10.97N/A
N/A
Redwheel Global Emerging Equity Ins
FIKEX46.10N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Industrials Z

CSASF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CSASF has been loosely correlated with FDCHF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CSASF jumps, then FDCHF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSASF
1D Price
Change %
CSASF100%
N/A
FDCHF - CSASF
50%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ELEEF - CSASF
24%
Poorly correlated
-4.26%
PMTS - CSASF
24%
Poorly correlated
-9.14%
BCVVF - CSASF
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ASHTY - CSASF
7%
Poorly correlated
-7.95%
More

PMTS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PMTS has been loosely correlated with OMF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PMTS jumps, then OMF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PMTS
1D Price
Change %
PMTS100%
-9.14%
OMF - PMTS
37%
Loosely correlated
-8.29%
SYF - PMTS
35%
Loosely correlated
-5.91%
ENVA - PMTS
35%
Loosely correlated
-6.78%
SLM - PMTS
35%
Loosely correlated
-6.69%
COF - PMTS
33%
Loosely correlated
-8.21%
More