CSBB
Price
$41.50
Change
+$0.61 (+1.49%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
98.51M
FSBW
Price
$38.18
Change
-$0.11 (-0.29%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
270.94M
4 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CSBB vs FSBW

Header iconCSBB vs FSBW Comparison
Open Charts CSBB vs FSBWBanner chart's image
CSB Ban
Price$41.50
Change+$0.61 (+1.49%)
Volume$318
Capitalization98.51M
FS Ban
Price$38.18
Change-$0.11 (-0.29%)
Volume$14.94K
Capitalization270.94M
CSBB vs FSBW Comparison Chart
Loading...
FSBW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CSBB vs. FSBW commentary
Apr 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSBB is a Hold and FSBW is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 19, 2025
Stock price -- (CSBB: $41.50 vs. FSBW: $38.18)
Brand notoriety: CSBB and FSBW are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CSBB: 18% vs. FSBW: 96%
Market capitalization -- CSBB: $98.51M vs. FSBW: $270.94M
CSBB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $98.51M. FSBW’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $270.94M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CSBB’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileFSBW’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CSBB’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • FSBW’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, FSBW is a better buy in the long-term than CSBB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FSBW’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FSBW’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

CSBB (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.49% price change this week, while FSBW (@Regional Banks) price change was +3.47% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.67%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.79%.

Reported Earning Dates

CSBB is expected to report earnings on Apr 25, 2023.

FSBW is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+3.08% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSBW($271M) has a higher market cap than CSBB($98.5M). FSBW has higher P/E ratio than CSBB: FSBW (7.32) vs CSBB (6.65). CSBB YTD gains are higher at: 9.448 vs. FSBW (-6.381). FSBW has more cash in the bank: 18.1M vs. CSBB (17M). CSBB has less debt than FSBW: CSBB (2.39M) vs FSBW (150M). FSBW has higher revenues than CSBB: FSBW (141M) vs CSBB (40.4M).
CSBBFSBWCSBB / FSBW
Capitalization98.5M271M36%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD9.448-6.381-148%
P/E Ratio6.657.3291%
Revenue40.4M141M29%
Total Cash17M18.1M94%
Total Debt2.39M150M2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CSBB vs FSBW: Fundamental Ratings
CSBB
FSBW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3418
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
53
Fair valued
42
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2018
SMR RATING
1..100
2212
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4749
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1119
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FSBW's Valuation (42) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CSBB (53) in the null industry. This means that FSBW’s stock grew similarly to CSBB’s over the last 12 months.

FSBW's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CSBB (20) in the null industry. This means that FSBW’s stock grew similarly to CSBB’s over the last 12 months.

FSBW's SMR Rating (12) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CSBB (22) in the null industry. This means that FSBW’s stock grew similarly to CSBB’s over the last 12 months.

CSBB's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as FSBW (49) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CSBB’s stock grew similarly to FSBW’s over the last 12 months.

CSBB's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the null industry is in the same range as FSBW (19) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CSBB’s stock grew similarly to FSBW’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FSBW
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FSBW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
XTNT0.450.05
+13.67%
Xtant Medical Holdings
DX11.670.08
+0.69%
Dynex Capital
TRU72.89-0.86
-1.17%
TransUnion
GCTK0.16-0.01
-3.05%
GlucoTrack Inc
QFIN35.33-1.21
-3.31%
Qifu Technology

CSBB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CSBB and WTBFB have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CSBB and WTBFB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSBB
1D Price
Change %
CSBB100%
+1.49%
WTBFB - CSBB
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.04%
WFCL - CSBB
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HBCP - CSBB
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.00%
FSBW - CSBB
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.29%
MOFG - CSBB
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.52%
More

FSBW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSBW has been closely correlated with FCBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FSBW jumps, then FCBC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSBW
1D Price
Change %
FSBW100%
-0.29%
FCBC - FSBW
76%
Closely correlated
+2.24%
CCBG - FSBW
76%
Closely correlated
+1.18%
GSBC - FSBW
75%
Closely correlated
+3.55%
TMP - FSBW
75%
Closely correlated
-0.26%
FMBH - FSBW
74%
Closely correlated
+0.72%
More