It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CSBB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFSBW’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CSBB’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FSBW’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
CSBB (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.45% price change this week, while FSBW (@Regional Banks) price change was -9.41% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -3.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.80%.
CSBB is expected to report earnings on Apr 25, 2023.
FSBW is expected to report earnings on Jan 23, 2025.
Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
CSBB | FSBW | CSBB / FSBW | |
Capitalization | 98.5M | 271M | 36% |
EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | 8.445 | 16.083 | 53% |
P/E Ratio | 6.65 | 7.32 | 91% |
Revenue | 40.4M | 141M | 29% |
Total Cash | 17M | 18.1M | 94% |
Total Debt | 2.39M | 150M | 2% |
CSBB | FSBW | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 15 | 11 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 37 Fair valued | 50 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 56 | 31 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 50 | 24 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | 47 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 25 | 40 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CSBB's Valuation (37) in the null industry is in the same range as FSBW (50) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CSBB’s stock grew similarly to FSBW’s over the last 12 months.
FSBW's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CSBB (56) in the null industry. This means that FSBW’s stock grew similarly to CSBB’s over the last 12 months.
FSBW's SMR Rating (24) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CSBB (50) in the null industry. This means that FSBW’s stock grew similarly to CSBB’s over the last 12 months.
FSBW's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CSBB (51) in the null industry. This means that FSBW’s stock grew similarly to CSBB’s over the last 12 months.
CSBB's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the null industry is in the same range as FSBW (40) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CSBB’s stock grew similarly to FSBW’s over the last 12 months.
CSBB | FSBW | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago61% | 1 day ago61% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago54% | 1 day ago70% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago51% | 1 day ago63% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago37% | 1 day ago67% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago43% | 1 day ago62% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago38% | 1 day ago60% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago29% | 9 days ago64% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 25 days ago36% | 1 day ago60% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago51% | 1 day ago69% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago34% | 1 day ago64% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
BNIEX | 10.20 | N/A | N/A |
UBS International Sustainable Equity A | |||
ASYLX | 14.82 | -0.29 | -1.92% |
AB Select US Long/Short Advisor | |||
OIGAX | 32.25 | -0.81 | -2.45% |
Invesco Oppenheimer International Gr A | |||
RYTSX | 53.59 | -2.03 | -3.65% |
Rydex Transportation A | |||
MIGWX | 28.29 | -1.16 | -3.94% |
Marsico Growth Institutional |
A.I.dvisor tells us that CSBB and WTBFB have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CSBB and WTBFB's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CSBB | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CSBB | 100% | -0.61% | ||
WTBFB - CSBB | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
WFCL - CSBB | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
HBCP - CSBB | 21% Poorly correlated | -6.29% | ||
FSBW - CSBB | 21% Poorly correlated | -7.46% | ||
MOFG - CSBB | 20% Poorly correlated | -6.11% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSBW has been closely correlated with FCBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FSBW jumps, then FCBC could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FSBW | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
FSBW | 100% | -7.46% | ||
FCBC - FSBW | 73% Closely correlated | -6.78% | ||
THFF - FSBW | 71% Closely correlated | -5.39% | ||
MOFG - FSBW | 71% Closely correlated | -6.11% | ||
CCNE - FSBW | 71% Closely correlated | -5.47% | ||
RBCAA - FSBW | 71% Closely correlated | -6.11% | ||
More |