CSBB
Price
$49.75
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 2 closing price
Capitalization
131.2M
WFCL
Price
$6600.00
Change
+$500.00 (+8.20%)
Updated
Sep 11 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

CSBB vs WFCL

Header iconCSBB vs WFCL Comparison
Open Charts CSBB vs WFCLBanner chart's image
CSB Ban
Price$49.75
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$331
Capitalization131.2M
1867 Western Financial
Price$6600.00
Change+$500.00 (+8.20%)
Volume$7
CapitalizationN/A
CSBB vs WFCL Comparison Chart in %
CSBB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WFCL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CSBB vs. WFCL commentary
Oct 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSBB is a Buy and WFCL is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CSBB: $49.75 vs. WFCL: $6600.00)
Brand notoriety: CSBB and WFCL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CSBB: 52% vs. WFCL: 64%
Market capitalization -- CSBB: $131.2M vs. WFCL: $0
CSBB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $131.2M. WFCL’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.13B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CSBB’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWFCL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CSBB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WFCL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CSBB is a better buy in the long-term than WFCL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CSBB’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WFCL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CSBB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • WFCL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CSBB and WFCL are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CSBB (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.81% price change this week, while WFCL (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.54%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.44% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSBB YTD gains are higher at: 33.642 vs. WFCL (21.111).
CSBBWFCLCSBB / WFCL
Capitalization131MN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD33.64221.111159%
P/E Ratio10.30N/A-
Revenue45.1MN/A-
Total Cash27MN/A-
Total Debt965KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CSBB vs WFCL: Fundamental Ratings
CSBB
WFCL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
62
Fair valued
8
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6100
SMR RATING
1..100
54100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4446
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
33100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5046

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WFCL's Valuation (8) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CSBB (62). This means that WFCL’s stock grew somewhat faster than CSBB’s over the last 12 months.

CSBB's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for WFCL (100). This means that CSBB’s stock grew significantly faster than WFCL’s over the last 12 months.

CSBB's SMR Rating (54) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WFCL (100). This means that CSBB’s stock grew somewhat faster than WFCL’s over the last 12 months.

CSBB's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as WFCL (46). This means that CSBB’s stock grew similarly to WFCL’s over the last 12 months.

CSBB's P/E Growth Rating (33) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for WFCL (100). This means that CSBB’s stock grew significantly faster than WFCL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CSBBWFCL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
21%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
37%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
22%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
27%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
29%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
24%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
34%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
36%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CSBB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WFCL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CHDRY155.9910.05
+6.89%
Christian Dior S.E.
AIXN0.60N/A
N/A
AiXin Life International, Inc.
DUERF22.55N/A
N/A
Duerr AG
PECGF0.86N/A
N/A
Petronas Chemicals Group Bhd
KITAF0.97N/A
N/A
Kitanotatsujin Corporation

CSBB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CSBB and WTBFB have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CSBB and WTBFB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSBB
1D Price
Change %
CSBB100%
N/A
WTBFB - CSBB
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WFCL - CSBB
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HBCP - CSBB
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.83%
FSBW - CSBB
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.50%
MOFG - CSBB
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.48%
More

WFCL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WFCL and OTTW have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WFCL and OTTW's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WFCL
1D Price
Change %
WFCL100%
N/A
OTTW - WFCL
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CIBN - WFCL
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DBIN - WFCL
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CDAB - WFCL
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EXCH - WFCL
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More