Ad is loading...
CSDGX vs FSSNX
CSDGX vs FSSNX Comparison
Open Charts CSDGX vs FSSNX
Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth A
Price$15.73
Change+$0.16 (+1.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets184.45M
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$28.65
Change+$0.30 (+1.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.09B
CSDGX vs FSSNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSDGX vs. FSSNX commentary
Jan 31, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSDGX is a Buy and FSSNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 27.1B vs. CSDGX (184M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than CSDGX: FSSNX (1.36) vs CSDGX (0.60). CSDGX was incepted earlier than FSSNX: CSDGX (6 years) vs FSSNX (13 years). FSSNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 9.00 vs. CSDGX (0.02). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSDGX: FSSNX (0) vs CSDGX (5000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.01 vs. CSDGX (6.21). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 47.92 vs. CSDGX (27.29).
| CSDGX | FSSNX | CSDGX / FSSNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.367 | 2.421 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 184M | 27.1B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.60 | 1.36 | 44% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.21 | 19.01 | 33% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.55 | 18.12 | 53% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.29 | 47.92 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 89.51 | - |