Ad is loading...
CSDGX vs FSSNX
CSDGX vs FSSNX Comparison
Open Charts CSDGX vs FSSNX
Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth A
Price$14.64
Change-$0.27 (-1.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets174.43M
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$25.12
Change-$0.69 (-2.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.76B
CSDGX vs FSSNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSDGX vs. FSSNX commentary
Mar 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSDGX is a Hold and FSSNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 25.8B vs. CSDGX (174M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than CSDGX: FSSNX (1.06) vs CSDGX (0.37). CSDGX was incepted earlier than FSSNX: CSDGX (6 years) vs FSSNX (14 years). CSDGX (1.81) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). CSDGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. FSSNX (9.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSDGX: FSSNX (0) vs CSDGX (5000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.12 vs. CSDGX (-3.42). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 71.60 vs. CSDGX (46.33).
| CSDGX | FSSNX | CSDGX / FSSNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.03 | 4,800% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.03 | 7,240% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.972 | -6.756 | 29% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 174M | 25.8B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.37 | 1.06 | 35% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.42 | 1.12 | -305% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.30 | 10.01 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.33 | 71.60 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 64.31 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...