Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSDGX vs FSSNX
CSDGX vs FSSNX Comparison
Open Charts CSDGX vs FSSNX
Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth A
Price$15.68
Change+$0.09 (+0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets204.47M
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$28.13
Change+$0.28 (+1.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.56B
CSDGX vs FSSNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSDGX vs. FSSNX commentary
Jul 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSDGX is a Buy and FSSNX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 25.6B vs. CSDGX (204M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than CSDGX: FSSNX (0.92) vs CSDGX (0.37). CSDGX was incepted earlier than FSSNX: CSDGX (6 years) vs FSSNX (14 years). CSDGX (1.55) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). CSDGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. FSSNX (9.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSDGX: FSSNX (0) vs CSDGX (5000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.15 vs. CSDGX (2.78). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 64.11 vs. CSDGX (39.55).
| CSDGX | FSSNX | CSDGX / FSSNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.03 | 4,800% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.55 | 0.03 | 6,200% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.498 | 1.626 | 154% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 204M | 25.6B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.37 | 0.92 | 40% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.78 | 12.15 | 23% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.75 | 36.67 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.55 | 64.11 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 77.87 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement