Ad is loading...
CSDGX vs FTHFX
CSDGX vs FTHFX Comparison
Open Charts CSDGX vs FTHFX
Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth A
Price$15.73
Change+$0.16 (+1.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets184.45M
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$47.15
Change+$0.49 (+1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.54B
CSDGX vs FTHFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSDGX vs. FTHFX commentary
Jan 31, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSDGX is a Buy and FTHFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.5B vs. CSDGX (184M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than CSDGX: FTHFX (0.95) vs CSDGX (0.60). CSDGX was incepted earlier than FTHFX: CSDGX (6 years) vs FTHFX (13 years). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. CSDGX (0.02). CSDGX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: CSDGX (5000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.26 vs. CSDGX (6.21). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 81.42 vs. CSDGX (27.29).
| CSDGX | FTHFX | CSDGX / FTHFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.367 | 2.730 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 1000000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 184M | 10.5B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.60 | 0.95 | 63% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.21 | 12.26 | 51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.55 | 34.22 | 28% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.29 | 81.42 | 34% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 115.37 | - |