Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSDGX vs FTHFX
CSDGX vs FTHFX Comparison
Open Charts CSDGX vs FTHFX
Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth A
Price$15.61
Change+$0.10 (+0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets169.07M
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$47.67
Change+$0.81 (+1.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.78B
CSDGX vs FTHFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSDGX vs. FTHFX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSDGX is a StrongBuy and FTHFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.8B vs. CSDGX (169M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than CSDGX: FTHFX (0.76) vs CSDGX (0.37). CSDGX was incepted earlier than FTHFX: CSDGX (6 years) vs FTHFX (14 years). CSDGX (1.55) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. CSDGX (24.00). CSDGX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: CSDGX (5000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.03 vs. CSDGX (-2.23). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 99.73 vs. CSDGX (35.37).
| CSDGX | FTHFX | CSDGX / FTHFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.63 | 190% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.55 | 0.63 | 246% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.630 | 4.954 | 53% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 1000000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 169M | 10.8B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.37 | 0.76 | 48% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.23 | 2.03 | -110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.57 | 45.52 | 36% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.37 | 99.73 | 35% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 152.73 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement