Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSDGX vs FTHFX
CSDGX vs FTHFX Comparison
Open Charts CSDGX vs FTHFX
Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth A
Price$15.02
Change-$0.22 (-1.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets161.56M
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$43.73
Change-$0.69 (-1.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.11B
CSDGX vs FTHFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSDGX vs. FTHFX commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSDGX is a StrongBuy and FTHFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.1B vs. CSDGX (162M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than CSDGX: FTHFX (0.79) vs CSDGX (0.38). CSDGX was incepted earlier than FTHFX: CSDGX (6 years) vs FTHFX (14 years). CSDGX (1.55) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. CSDGX (24.00). CSDGX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: CSDGX (5000) vs FTHFX (1000000). CSDGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.20 vs. FTHFX (-0.23). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 96.61 vs. CSDGX (39.70).
| CSDGX | FTHFX | CSDGX / FTHFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.63 | 190% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.55 | 0.63 | 246% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.197 | -2.202 | -9% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 1000000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 162M | 10.1B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.38 | 0.79 | 48% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.20 | -0.23 | -530% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.84 | 41.67 | 48% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.70 | 96.61 | 41% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 135.97 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers