Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSDGX vs FTHFX
CSDGX vs FTHFX Comparison
Open Charts CSDGX vs FTHFX
Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth A
Price$15.10
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets155.7M
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$48.60
Change+$0.02 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.79B
CSDGX vs FTHFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSDGX vs. FTHFX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSDGX is a Hold and FTHFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.8B vs. CSDGX (156M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than CSDGX: FTHFX (0.70) vs CSDGX (0.36). CSDGX was incepted earlier than FTHFX: CSDGX (7 years) vs FTHFX (14 years). CSDGX (1.55) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. CSDGX (24.00). CSDGX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: CSDGX (5000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.11 vs. CSDGX (-7.56). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 79.21 vs. CSDGX (19.37).
| CSDGX | FTHFX | CSDGX / FTHFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.63 | 190% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.55 | 0.63 | 246% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.723 | 6.957 | -10% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 1000000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 156M | 10.8B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.36 | 0.70 | 52% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.56 | -5.11 | 148% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.62 | 36.76 | 32% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.37 | 79.21 | 24% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 159.87 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement