Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSDGX vs NAESX
CSDGX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts CSDGX vs NAESX
Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth A
Price$15.61
Change+$0.10 (+0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets169.07M
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$118.17
Change+$0.72 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets153.28B
CSDGX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSDGX vs. NAESX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSDGX is a StrongBuy and NAESX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 153B vs. CSDGX (169M). NAESX pays higher dividends than CSDGX: NAESX (1.28) vs CSDGX (0.37). CSDGX was incepted earlier than NAESX: CSDGX (6 years) vs NAESX (65 years). CSDGX (1.55) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). CSDGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSDGX: NAESX (3000) vs CSDGX (5000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.46 vs. CSDGX (-2.23). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 66.66 vs. CSDGX (35.37).
| CSDGX | NAESX | CSDGX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.17 | 706% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.55 | 0.17 | 912% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.630 | 2.781 | 95% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 3000 | 167% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 169M | 153B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.37 | 1.28 | 29% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.23 | 8.46 | -26% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.57 | 34.15 | 49% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.37 | 66.66 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 114.71 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement