Ad is loading...
CSEIX vs FRLCX
CSEIX vs FRLCX Comparison
Open Charts CSEIX vs FRLCX
Cohen & Steers Real Estate Securities A
Price$16.09
Change-$0.12 (-0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.92B
Nuveen Real Estate Securities C
Price$13.55
Change-$0.13 (-0.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets936.85M
CSEIX vs FRLCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSEIX vs. FRLCX commentary
May 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSEIX is a Hold and FRLCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSEIX has more cash in the bank: 7.92B vs. FRLCX (937M). CSEIX pays higher dividends than FRLCX: CSEIX (2.68) vs FRLCX (2.45). CSEIX was incepted earlier than FRLCX: CSEIX (28 years) vs FRLCX (25 years). FRLCX (2.02) is less costly to investors than CSEIX (1.10). FRLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. CSEIX (35.00). CSEIX has a lower initial minimum investment than FRLCX: CSEIX (0) vs FRLCX (2500). CSEIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.85 vs. FRLCX (4.66). CSEIX return over 5 years is better than : 51.69 vs. FRLCX (2.87).
| CSEIX | FRLCX | CSEIX / FRLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.93 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 2.02 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.626 | 0.160 | 1,016% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.92B | 937M | 846% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.68 | 2.45 | 110% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.85 | 4.66 | 255% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.77 | -18.63 | -15% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.69 | 2.87 | 1,800% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.20 | -29.41 | -96% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...