Ad is loading...
CSEIX vs FRLCX
CSEIX vs FRLCX Comparison
Open Charts CSEIX vs FRLCX
Cohen & Steers Real Estate Securities A
Price$15.16
Change-$0.29 (-1.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.96B
Nuveen Real Estate Securities C
Price$12.81
Change-$0.28 (-2.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets912.26M
CSEIX vs FRLCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSEIX vs. FRLCX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSEIX is a Hold and FRLCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSEIX has more cash in the bank: 7.97B vs. FRLCX (912M). CSEIX pays higher dividends than FRLCX: CSEIX (2.66) vs FRLCX (2.39). CSEIX was incepted earlier than FRLCX: CSEIX (28 years) vs FRLCX (25 years). FRLCX (1.97) is less costly to investors than CSEIX (1.10). FRLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 72.00 vs. CSEIX (41.00). CSEIX has a lower initial minimum investment than FRLCX: CSEIX (0) vs FRLCX (3000). CSEIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.28 vs. FRLCX (-0.06). CSEIX return over 5 years is better than : 25.67 vs. FRLCX (-14.27).
| CSEIX | FRLCX | CSEIX / FRLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.97 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.97 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.138 | -5.268 | 60% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.97B | 912M | 873% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.66 | 2.39 | 111% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.28 | -0.06 | -14,823% |
| Returns for 3 years | -13.35 | -31.97 | 42% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.67 | -14.27 | -180% |
| Returns for 10 years | 22.11 | -34.17 | -65% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers