Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSEIX vs FRLCX
CSEIX vs FRLCX Comparison
Open Charts CSEIX vs FRLCX
Cohen & Steers Real Estate Securities A
Price$16.57
Change+$0.03 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.3B
Nuveen Real Estate Securities C
Price$14.00
Change+$0.06 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets858.01M
CSEIX vs FRLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSEIX vs. FRLCX commentary
Oct 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSEIX is a Buy and FRLCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSEIX has more cash in the bank: 8.3B vs. FRLCX (858M). CSEIX (2.72) and FRLCX (2.65) have matching dividends . CSEIX was incepted earlier than FRLCX: CSEIX (28 years) vs FRLCX (26 years). FRLCX (2.02) is less costly to investors than CSEIX (1.10). FRLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. CSEIX (35.00). CSEIX has a lower initial minimum investment than FRLCX: CSEIX (0) vs FRLCX (2500). CSEIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.90 vs. FRLCX (-8.08). CSEIX return over 5 years is better than : 30.34 vs. FRLCX (-11.78).
| CSEIX | FRLCX | CSEIX / FRLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.93 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 2.02 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.537 | 2.554 | 217% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.3B | 858M | 968% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.72 | 2.65 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.90 | -8.08 | 24% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.42 | -4.53 | -539% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.34 | -11.78 | -258% |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.26 | -25.14 | -240% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement